Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:37:01.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHILOSOPHY AND A SCIENTIFIC FUTURE OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

ERIC SCHLIESSER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Mini-symposium on the Future of History of Economics: Young Scholars' Perspective
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 105 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boumans, M. J. 2005. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre. 1991. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, translated by Wiener, Philip P.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. 1989. “Realism and the Historicity of Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 86 (8): 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 1996. “Who's Afraid of the History of Contemporary Science?” In Soderquist, T., ed., The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology. Reading: Harwood.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert, and McElreath, Richard. 2001. “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 5 Small-Scale Societies.” The American Economic Review 91 (2): 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peart, Sandra, and Levy, David M.. 2005. The Vanity of the Philosopher. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 1992. “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science.” History of Political Economy 24 (1): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 2002. “Coming Together: History of Economics as History of Science.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., The Future of the History of Economics, Annual Supplement to Volume 34, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 208–25.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2005a. “Realism in the Face of Scientific Revolutions: Adam Smith on Newton's Proof of Copernicanism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (4): 97–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2005b. “Galilean Reflections on Milton Friedman's ‘Methodology of Positive Economics,’ with Thoughts on Vernon Smith's ‘Economics in the Laboratory’.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1): 50–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2008. “Milton Friedman, Positive Economics, and the Chicago Boys.” In Emmett, Ross B., ed., The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. Forthcoming. “Prophecy, Eclipses and Wholesale Markets: A Case Study on Why Data Driven Economic History Requires History of Economics, a Philosopher's Reflection.”Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte, edited by Schefold, Bertram.Google Scholar
Slotsky, A. L. 1997. The Bourse of Babylon: Market Quotations in Astronomical Diaries of Babylonia. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1982. Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by Wightman, W. P. D. and Bryce, J. C.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2005. “Testing Newton, Then and Now.” Paper delivered at University of Pittsburgh, November 11, 2005.Google Scholar
Spek, , Van Der, R. J. and Mandemakers, C. A.. 2003. “Sense and Nonsense in the Statistical Approach to Babylonian Prices.” Biblioteca Orientalis 60, http://www.achemenet.com/ressources/souspresse/annonces/VdSpekrevise.pdf, accessed January 31, 2007.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. 2002. “Price Behavior in Ancient Babylonia.” Explorations in Economic History 39 (1): 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherson, Brian. 2002. “Keynes, Uncertainty and Interest Rates.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (1): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, Roy E. 1996. “What Defines a Legitimate Contribution to the Subdiscipline ‘History of Economics’?” Editorial posted: 1996-09-09.http://www.eh.net/HE/hes_list/Editorials/weintraub.php Accessed March 25, 2006.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Roy E. 2002a. “Will Economics Ever have a Past Again?” In Weintraub, E. Roy, 2002, The Future of the History of Economics, Annual Supplement to Vol. 34, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Roy E. ed. 2002b. The Future of the History of Economics, Annual Supplement to Vol. 34, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar