Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:21:41.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OTTO NEURATH AND THE LINGUISTIC TURN IN ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2016

Michael Turk
Michael Turk*
Affiliation:
Economics, History, and Political Science, Fitchburg State University, Massachusetts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the history of economic thought Otto Neurath, who is known foremost for spearheading the development of the Vienna Circle of philosophers, has served largely as a foil for his advocacy of in-kind calculation and economic planning. Yet Neurath, who was trained as an economist and wrote extensively about economics, including its philosophical foundations, held an abiding interest in the use of language in science, and was strongly influenced by turn-of-the-twentieth-century conventionalists, among them Henri Poincaré and Pierre Duhem. Consequently, Neurath’s critique of what he saw as the conceptual flaws of economics and its too narrow framework as price theory was rooted as much in its imprecise and ‘unsorted’ use of language as in his critical view of capitalism. As such, he anticipated the ‘linguistic turn’ in economics that gained prominence only a half-century later, without any recognition of his presaging role.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 371 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balabkins, Nicholas W. 1978. “Der Zukunftsstaat: Carl Ballod’s Vision of a Leisure-Oriented Socialism.” History of Political Economy 10 (2): 213–232.Google Scholar
Bauer, Otto. 1919. Der Weg zum Sozialismus. Wien: Ignaz Brand.Google Scholar
Becchio, Giandomenica. 2005. “Two Heterodox Economists: Otto Neurath and Karl Polanyi.” Working paper No. 11. Centro di Studi sulla Storia e I Metodi dell’Economia Politica (CESMEP).Google Scholar
Becchio, Giandomenica. 2013. “Economics in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.” History of Economic Thought and Policy 2: 145–156.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, Cat, Jordi, Fleck, Lola, and Uebel, Thomas. 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaloupek, Gunther K. 1990. “The Austrian Debate on Economic Calculation in a Socialist Economy.” HOPE 22 (4): 659–675.Google Scholar
Frank, Philipp. 1941. Between Physics and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Philipp. 1949. Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haller, Rudolf. 1991a. “History and the System of Science in Otto Neurath.” In Uebel, Thomas, ed., Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. New York: Springer, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
Haller, Rudolf. 1991b. “The First Vienna Circle.” In Uebel, Thomas, ed., Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
Haller, Rudolf. 1993. Neopositivismus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935. “The Nature and History of the Problem.” In Hayek, F. A., ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. London: G. Routledge, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Edited by Kresge, Stephen and Wenar, Leif. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert. 1988. “Rhetoric and Ideology.” In Klamer, Arjo, McCloskey, Donald N., and Solow, Robert M., eds., The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Richard, Nemeth, Elisabeth, Pichler, Wolfram, and Wagner, David, eds. 2011. Image and Imaging in Philosophy, Science and the Arts. Volume 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Ontos verlag.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey, 1997. “The Fate of the Cambridge Capital Controversy.” In Arestis, Philip, Palma, Gabriel, and Sawyer, Malcolm, eds., Capital Controversy, Post-Keynesian Economics. London: Routledge, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. 1999. “‘Seeing is Believing’. Otto Neurath, Graphic Art, and Social Order.” History of Political Economy 31 (4): 452–478.Google Scholar
Lessman, Ortrud. 2008. “A Similar Line of Thought in Neurath and Sen: Interpersonal Comparability.” In Nemeth, E. et al., eds., Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 115–130.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre M. 2001. “The Genealogy of Postmodernism: An Economist’s Guide.” In Cullenberg, Stephen, Amariglio, Jack, and Ruccio, David F., eds., Postmodernism, Economics and Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 102–128.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig. 1920. “Die Wirtschaftsrechnung in sozialistischen Gemeinwesen.” Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 47 (1): 86–121.Google Scholar
Nemeth, Elisabeth. 2008. “‘Freeing up One’s Point of View’: Neurath’s Machian Heritage Compared with Schumpeter’s.” In Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.13–36.Google Scholar
Nemeth, Elisabeth, Schmutz, Stefan W., and Uebel, Thomas, eds. 2008. Otto Neurath’s Economics in Context. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Neurath, Marie. 1973. “University Days in Berlin.” In Neurath, Marie and Cohen, Robert S., eds., Empiricism and Sociology by Otto Neurath. Translated by Paul Foulkes and Marie Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel, p. 7.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1910] 2004. “On the Theory of Social Science.” In Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., eds., Otto Neurath: Economic Writings/Selections 1904–1945. With multiple translators. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 265–291.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1911. “Nationalokonomie und Wertlehre, eine systematische Untersuchung.” Zeitschrift fur Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik under Verwaltung 20: 52–115.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1913] 1983. “The Lost Wanderers of Descartes and the Auxiliary Motive.” In Cohen, Robert S. and Neurath, Marie, eds. and transl., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1914–15] 1981. “Zur Klassifikation von Hypothesen systemen.” In Haller, Rudolf and Rutte, Heiner, eds., Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften. Volume 1. Wien: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1920] 2004. “Total Socialisation.” In Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., eds., Otto Neurath: Economic Writings: Selections 1904–1945. With multiple translators. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 371–404.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1931a. Empirische soziologie. Wien: J. Springer.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1931b. “Physicalism: The Philosophy of the Vienna Circle.” The Monist 41 (4): 618–623.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1935. Was bedeutet rationale Wirtschaftsbetrachtung?. Wien:Verlag Gerold & Co.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1936] 1983. “Encyclopedia as ‘Model’.” In Cohen, Robert S. and Neurath, Marie, eds. and transl., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1938. “Unified Science as Encyclopedic Integration.” In Neurath, Otto, Carnap, Rudolf, and Morris, Charles, eds., International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Volume 1, numbers 1–5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1941. “Universal Jargon and Terminology.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41 (New Series): 127–148.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1943. “Planning or Managerial Revolution?” New Commonwealth Quarterly: 148–154.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. 1944. Foundations of the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1945] 2004. “Alternatives to Market Competition.” In Uebel, Thomas E. and Cohen, Robert S., eds., Otto Neurath: Economic Writings/Selections 1904–1945. With multiple translators. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 546–548.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1946] 1983. “The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism.” In Cohen, Robert S. and Neurath, Marie, eds. and transl., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 230–242.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto, and Schapire-Neurath, Anna. [1910] 1913. Lesebuch der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Second edition. Leipzig: G.A. Gloeckner.Google Scholar
O’Neill, John. 1999. “Ecology, Socialism and Austrian Economics.” In Nemeth, E. and Heinrich, R., eds., Otto Neurath: Rationalitat, Planning, Vielfalt. Vienna: Weiner Reihe, pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
O’Neill, John. 2004. “Ecological Economics and the Politics of Knowledge: The Debate between Hayek and Neurath.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 431–447.Google Scholar
Poincaré, Henri. 1906. Wissenschaft und Hypothese. Authorized German edition with explanatory noes by , F. and Lindemann, L.. Second improved edition. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Reisch, George. 1997a. “How Postmodern Was Neurath’s Ideas of Unity of Science?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3): 439–451.Google Scholar
Reisch, George. 1997b. “Economist, Epistemologist ... and Censor? On Otto Neurath’s Index Verborum Prohibitorum.” Perspectives on Science 5: 452–480.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1988. “Comments from Inside Economics.” In Klamer, Arjo, McCloskey, Donald N., and Solow, Robert M., eds., The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–37.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1995. Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turk, Michael. 2006. “The Fault Line of Axiomatization.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (2): 195–212.Google Scholar
Turk, Michael. 2012. “The Mathematical Turn in Economics: Walras, The French Mathematicians, and the Road Not Taken.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34 (2): 149–167.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. 1992. Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. 1996. Normativity and Convention. In Nemeth, E. and Stadler, F., eds., Encyclopedia and Utopia: The Life and Work of Otto Neurath. Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. 2000. Vernunftkritik und Wissenschaft: Otto Neurath und der erste Wiener Kreis. Wien: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas E. 2004. “Introduction.” In Otto Neurath: Economic Writings Selections 1904–1945. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1–108.Google Scholar
Vossoughian, Nader. 2011. Otto Neurath: The Language of the Global Polis. Rotterdam: Nai Publishers.Google Scholar