Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-23T00:09:37.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Role of Demand in Ricardo and Marshall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Giovanni A. Caravale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present note is a development of a paper I presented some four years ago at the 1987 meeting of the History of Economics Society (Caravale 1987), and that was later published in Rivista di Politico Economica in an expanded version (Caravale 1988). The aim of these two writings was to emphasize that—contrary to what is often maintained—demand conditions play a fundamental role in classical and classical-type theories. This role is different from that played by demand in neoclassical theories (where equilibrium prices are determined by demand and supply functions), and is so to speak “internal” to the theory of natural equilibrium since it is connected with the definition, for each situation, of the Smithian “point of effectual demand.” Before turning to the specific object of this note, let me recall very briefly the main points of the general thesis developed in the above-mentioned papers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Fall 1991 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caravale, G. 1987. “The Question of Continuity in Classical Economic Thought,” paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the History of Economics Society (Boston); in Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, 1, 13–104, edited by Walker, D. A., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., London, 1989.Google Scholar
Caravale, G.. 1988. “Condizioni di Domanda ed Equilibrio Naturale nelle Teorie Classiche e di Tipo Classico,” Rivista di Politica Economica, 12.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1983. “The Classical Theory of Wages and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 73, 05, 13–309.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1966. Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1974. Growth and Income Distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L.. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth, A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–73. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa, P. with the collaboration of Dobb, M. H., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar