Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:22:25.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marx on Rent: A Failure to Transform Correctly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Paul A. Samuelson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Karl Marx's theory of land rent plays a minor role in his overall economic system but provides us with a good opportunity to examine and score his analytic powers and attained understanding. The conclusion arrived at from the present reinvestigation confirms, I fear, the diagnosis that Marx was an autodidact who lacked mastery of the subject matter that he so confidently grappled with. Objective readers of my analysis can form their own judgments of Marx's written logic and empirical contentions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Fall 1992 , pp. 143 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumol, W. J. 1974. “The Transformation of Values: What Marx ‘Really’ Meant (An Interpretation),” Journal of Economic Literature, 12, no. 1, 51–62.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1978. Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus von. 1907. “On the Correction of Marx's Fundamental Theoretical Construction in the Third Volume of ‘Capital,’” Jahrbuch Nationalökonomie Statistik, 34, no. 3, 370–85; translated into English as an appendix to by Eugen, von Böhm-Bawerk, Karl Marx and the Close of His System and Rudolf, Hilferding, Böhm-Bawerk's Criticism of Marx, edited by Sweezy, P., Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1949.Google Scholar
Cantillon, Richard. 1755. Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, English translation, edited by Higgs, H., Macmillan, London, 1931.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Engels, F. and Marx, K. 1953. “Marx and Engels on Malthus,” Marx and Engels on the Population Bomb, edited by Meek, R., Lawrence & Wishart, London.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben. 1986. “On Marx's Theory of Agricultural Rent,” The Value Dimension: Marxversus Ricardo and Sraffa, edited by Ben, Fine, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1931. “Einige Punkte einer Preistheorie mit Boden und Arbeit als Produktionsfaktoren,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 3, 09 25, 62–163.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and King, J. E.. 1992. “Marx, Jones, Rodbertus and the Theory of Absolute Rent,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14, Spring, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Richard. 1831. An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth and the Source of Taxation, Murray, London.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. 1936. “Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States,” Review of Economic Statistics, 17, 08, 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, T. Robert. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society, with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet and Other Writers, Johnson, J., London; reprinted by Macmillan, London, 1926.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1847. The Poverty of Philosophy; English translation, International Publishers, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1894. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, I, II, III, Charles H. Kerr and Company, Chicago, 1909.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1968. Mathematical Manuscripts of Karl Marx, edited by Yanovskaya, S. A.; English translation, New Park Publications, London, 1983.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, D. Appleton, New York, 1880.Google Scholar
Morishima, Michio. 1973. Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morishima, Michio and Catephores, G.. 1978. Values, Exploitation, and Growth, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Negishi, Takashi. 1985. Economic Theories in a non-Walrasian Tradition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negishi, Takashi. 1989. History of Economic Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Neumann, John von. 1945. “Model of General Economic Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, 13, no. 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Oakley, Allen. 1976. “Two Notes on Marx and the Transformation Problem,” Economica, 43, no. 172, 411–17.Google Scholar
Oakley, Allen. 1985. Marx's Critique of Political and Economic Intellectual Sources and Evolution, Volume II 1861–1863, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston, Melbourne, Henley.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P. J. 1846. System of Economical Contradictions or the Philosophy of Poverty; English translation, The Proudhon Library, Boston, 1887.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1957. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, vol. 7 of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa, P., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rodbertus, J.K. 1851. Sociale Briefe an von Kirchmann, F. Gerhard, Berlin.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1957. “Wage and interest: A Modern Dissection of Marxian Economic Models,” American Economic Journal, 47, 12, 884–912.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1959. “A Modern Treatment of the Ricardian Economy: I. The Pricing of Goods and Labor and Land Services,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, no. 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1970. “The ‘Transformation’ from Marxian ‘Values’ to Competitive ‘Prices’: A Process of Rejection and Replacement,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 67, no. 1, 423–25; reproduced as Chapter 154 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 3, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1971. “Understanding the Marxian Notion of Exploitation: A Summary of the So-Called Transformation Problem between Marxian Values and Competitive Prices,” Journal of Economic Literature, 9, no. 2, 399–421; reproduced as Chapter 153 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 3, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1974. “Marx as Mathematical Economist: Steady State and Exponential Growth Equilibrium,” Trade, Stability and Macroeconomics, Essays in Honor of Lloyd A. Metzler, edited by Horwich, G. and Samuelson, P. A., Academic Press, New York; reproduced as Chapter 225 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 4, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy,” Journal of Economic Literature, 16, no. 4, 34–1415.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1990. “Revisionist Findings on Sraffa,” Essays on Piero Sraffa, edited by Schefold, B. and Bharadwaj, K., Unwin, Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1991. “Logic of the Historical Transformation Problem: Exchange Ratios under Simple Commodity Production,” Marx and Modern Economic Analysis, volume I: Values, Prices and Exploitation, edited by Caravale, G. A., Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Seton, Francis. 1957. “The ‘Transformation Problem,’” Review of Economic Studies, 24, no. 3, 149–60.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Edwin, Cannan, The Modern Library, New York, 1937.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1952. “The Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution,” Journal of Political Economy, 60, 06, 187–207; reprinted in Stigler, G. J., Essays in the History of Economics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1965, 156–97.Google Scholar
Thünen, Johann von. 1930. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, 3d ed., edited by Heinrich, Waentig, Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1991. “‘The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy’ in 1808 as Viewed from 1825: Thomas Chalmers on the ‘National Resources,’” History of Political Economy, 23, no. 2, 221–41.Google Scholar