Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:40:56.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Stuart Mill, Francis Longe and William Thornton on Demand and Supply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Evelyn L. Forget
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

William Thornton's On Labour, Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Dues, Its Actual Present and Possible Future was a contribution to the social debate of the 1860s. In the context of an attack on the vulgar wage-fund theory, which was wielded in popular discourse to emphasize the futility of trade unions, Thornton offered a more general assault on what he labelled “demand and supply.” John Stuart Mill had expected Thornton's book to play an important role in furthering his own campaign in support of trade union legalization, but the book received mixed reviews. Most critics missed the opportunity to respond to Thornton's social commentary, and focused instead on his analysis of demand and supply. The negative reviews found the theory wanting and, to John Stuart Mill's chagrin, dismissed the entire book. But the positive reviews were even more devastating from Mill's perspective. Not only did they ignore the social analysis, with which Mill was in agreement, but they seemed convinced that Thornton had demolished the demand and supply theory. Since Mill was then trying to consolidate the intellectual basis of the Liberal party on the foundation of classical political economy, this was hardly an outcome he could accept. The recantation article, which combined a sympathetic treatment of Thornton's social analysis with a criticism of his economic analysis, was the inevitable result (see Forget 1992).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Fall 1991 , pp. 205 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, Michael E. 1989. “John Stuart Mill's Demand Curves,” History of Political Economy, 21, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CliffeLeslie, T. E. Leslie, T. E. 1868. “Political Economy and the Rate of Wages,” Fraser's Magazine, 78, 81–95.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. E., Jr. and Thommesen, S. 1989. “Disequilibrium Theory and Thornton's Assault on the Laws of Supply and Demand,” History of Political Economy, 21, 567–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, E. L. 1989. “J.S. Mill and J.E. Cairnes On Natural Value,” History of Political Economy, 21, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, E. L.. 1992. “J. S. Mill and the Tory School: The Rhetorical Value of the Recantation,” History of Political Economy, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Longe, F. 1866. A Refutation of the Wage-Fund Theory, edited by Hollander, J., Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1923. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, edited by Ashley, W. J., Longmans, Green and Co., London.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.. 1844. “On the Definition of Political Economy,” in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 4, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1967, 309–40.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.. 1869. “Thornton on Labour and Its Claims,” in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 5, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1967, 632–68.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.. 1988. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 28, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Negishi, T. 1986. “Thornton's Criticism of Equilibrium Theory and Mill,” History of Political Economy, 18, 567–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negishi, T.. 1989. “On Equilibrium and Disequilibrium: A Reply to Ekelund and Thommesen,” History of Political Economy, 21, 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. 1965. Essays in the History of Economics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Thornton, W.T. 1870. On Labour, Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Dues, Its Actual Present and Possible Future, 2d. ed., Macmillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
Walker, F.A. 1875. “The Wage-fund Theory,” The North American Review, 01.Google Scholar
[Wilson, John]. 1871. “Economic Fallacies and Labour Utopias,” The Quarterly Review, 07.Google Scholar