Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:26:33.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JOHN STUART MILL AND THE IRISH LAND QUESTION: AN ILLUSTRATION OF HIS VIEW ON SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2020

Laura Valladão de Mattos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Stuart Mill’s involvement with the Land Question in Ireland is analyzed from the viewpoint of his theory of institutions. I argue that, for Mill, institutions should promote progress without endangering social order. When referring to economic institutions, “progress” meant, essentially, human improvement, a rise in economic productivity, and the increase of social justice. According to Mill, the cottier system did not fulfill any of these requisites and should be abandoned. Mill also rejected transposing to Ireland the “English model” of capitalist agriculture. This institution could eventually solve the economic problem but involved the unjust eviction of tenants and would not regenerate the Irish character. Given the particularities of Ireland, Mill endorsed peasant property as the most suitable form of land appropriation. It would, at the same time, improve the character of the people, enhance productivity, and increase the social justice of the system. It would also mitigate the conflicts that jeopardized social order.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 43 - 60
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Laura Valladão de Mattos, Department of Economics, University of São Paulo ([email protected]). I am grateful to Joe Persky, Philippe Gillig, Ivan Salomão, and the two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their helpful comments on this paper. I would also like to thank Paul Dudenhefer for this excellent revision of the English version of this text. I would like to acknowledge that this study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

References

REFERENCES

Black, Collison, Robert, D. 1953. “The Classical Economist and the Irish Problem.” Oxford Economic Papers 5, 1 (New Series): 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Collison, Robert, D. 1968. “Economic Policy in Ireland and India in the Time of J. S. Mill.” The Economic History Review 21, 2 (New Series): 321–336.Google Scholar
Furuya, Hiroyuki. 2017. “Classical Economic Theory and Policy during the Great Irish Famine.” Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics 5. http://mjpse.meiji.jp/articles/files/05-01/05-01.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2019.Google Scholar
Gray, Peter. 1995. The Irish Famine. Series New Horizons. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
Horsman, Reginald. 1976. “Origins of Racial Anglo-Saxonism in Great Britain before 1850.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (3): 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawana, Yuichiro. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Politics of the Irish Land Question.” The Kyoto Economic Review 79 (2): 123–143.Google Scholar
Kawana, Yuichiro. 2018. Logic and Society: The Political Thought of John Stuart Mill, 1827–1848. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzer, Bruce L. 1984. “John Stuart Mill and Irish Land: A Reassessment.” The Historical Journal 27 (1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzer, Bruce L. 1988. “Introduction.” In Robson, John M. and Kinzer, Bruce L., eds., Public and Parliamentary Speeches (Nov. 1850–Nov. 1868). Vol. XXVIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. xiii–lxi.Google Scholar
Kinzer, Bruce L. 2001. England’s Disgrace: J. S. Mill and the Irish Question. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koot, Gerard M. 1975. “T. E. Cliffe Leslie, Irish Social Reform, and the Origins of the English Historical School of Economics.” History of Political Economy l7 (3): 312–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipkes, Jeff. 1999. Politics, Religion and Classical Political Economy in Britain—John Stuart Mill and His Followers. London: Macmillan; and New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattos, Laura V. 2000. “John Stuart Mill, Socialism and His Liberal Utopia: An Application of His View of Social Institutions.” History of Economic Ideas VIII (2): 95–120.Google Scholar
Mattos, Laura V. 2005. “Mill’s Transformational View of Human Nature.” History of Economic Ideas XIII (3): 33–55.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1832] 1986. “The Irish Character.” In Robson, Ann and Robson, John M., eds., Newspaper Writings by John Stuart Mill—Aug. 1831–Oct. 1834. Vol. XXIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 397–398.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1833] 1969. “Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy.” In Robson, John M., Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. X of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1836] 1977. “Civilization.” In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. XVIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 119–147.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1974. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. In Robson, John M., ed., Books IV–VI, and appendices, Vol. VIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1846–1847] 1986. “The Condition of Ireland” (N. 1–N. 43). In Robson, Ann P. and Robson, John M., eds., Newspaper Writings by John Stuart Mill (January 1835–June 1847). Vol. XXIV of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 879–1033.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1849–1873] 1972. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873. Edited by Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N.. Vol. XV of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1850–1868] 1988. Public and Parliamentary Speeches (Nov. 1850–Nov. 1868). Edited by Robson, John M. and Kinzer, Bruce L.. Vol. XXVIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1850] 1984. “The Negro Question.” In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on Equality, Law and Education. Vol. XXI of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1977. Considerations on Representative Government. In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. XIX of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 371–577.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1868] 1982. England and Ireland. In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on England, Ireland and the Empire. Vol. VI of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 505–532.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869] 1984. The Subjection of Women. In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on Equality, Law and Education. Vol. XXI of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 259–340.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1870] 1967. “Leslie on the Land Question.” In Robson, John M., ed., Essays on Economics and Society, part 2. Vol. V of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 669–685.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1871] 1965. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Vols. II and III of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1873] 1981. Autobiography. In Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, eds., Autobiography and Literary Essays. Vol. I of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 1–289.Google Scholar
Peart, Sandra J., and Levy, David M.. 2005. The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platteau, Jean-Philippe. 1983. “Classical Economics and Agrarian Reforms in Underdeveloped Areas: The Radical Views of the Two Mills.” The Journal of Development Studies 19 (4): 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. 1968. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; and Buffalo: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. 1998. “Civilization and Culture as Moral Concepts.” In Skroupski, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romani, Roberto. 1997. “British Views on Irish National Character, 1800–1846. An Intellectual History.” History of European Ideas 23 (5–6): 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, E. D. 1970a. “J. S. Mill and the Irish Question: The Principles of Political Economy, 1848–1865.” The Historical Journal 13 (2): 216–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, E. D. 1970b. “J. S. Mill and the Irish Question: Reform and the Integrity of the Empire, 1865–1870.” The Historical Journal 13 (3): 419–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Eileen P. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J. S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (4): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastoupil, Lynn. 1983. “Moral Government: J. S. Mill on Ireland.” Historical Journal 26 (3): 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar