Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:59:57.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Jevonian Revolution in International Trade Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

John Aldrich
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.

Extract

There was no Jevonian revolution in international trade theory. The new ideas of marginal analysis entering British economics in the late nineteenth century seem to have left the field untouched. According to Schumpeter (1954, p. 609), Marshall “did not do more than polish and develop Mill's meaning … Edgeworth's famous restatement added many interesting details but also did not go beyond Mill in fundamentals.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. 1996. “The Course of Marshall's Theorising about Demand.” History of Political Economy 28: 171218.Google Scholar
Aldrich, . 1997. “The Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Auspitz, R. and Lieben, R.. 1889. Untersuchungen uber die Theorie der Preise. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Bastable, W. 1888. Theory of International Trade. References are to fourth edition (1903). London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N. and Johnson, H. G.. 1960. “Notes on Some Controversies in the Theory of International Trade.” Economic Journal 71: 7493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerdike, C. F. 1906. “The Theory of Incipient Taxes.” Economic Journal 15: 529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. D. C. 1970. “Introduction.” In W. S. Jevons, The Theory of Political Economy, edited by Black, R. D. C.. Harmondsworth Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Black, R. D. C., ed. 1973. Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, Vol. II. London: Macmillan, in association with the Royal Economic Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. D. C., ed. 1981. Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, Vol. VII. London: Macmillan, in association with the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. 1924. The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. 1875. Some Leading Principles of Political Economy Newly Expounded. Reprinted New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1967.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. 1960. Trade and Economic Structure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. 1965. “A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 2, The Neo-classical Theory.” Econometrica 33: 685760.Google Scholar
Creedy, J. 1986. Edgeworth and the Development of Neoclassical Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Creedy, . 1990. “Marshall and International Trade.” In Whitaker, J. K., ed., The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 2 volumes. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society, 1975.Google Scholar
Creedy, . 1992. Demand and Exchange in Economic Analysis: A History from Cournot to Marshall. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. Reprinted London: London School of Economics, 1933.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1886. “Review of Journal and Letters of W. S. Jevons.” Academy 30: 355–56.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1887. “Review of Bastable's Theory of International Trade.” Academy 31: 356.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1889. “On the Application of Mathematics to Political Economy: Presidential Address to Section F of the British Association.” Report pp. 671–96. Reprinted in F. Y. Edgeworth, Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1925, 360.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1890. “Review of Marshall's Principles of Economics.” Academy 38: 165–66.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1892. “Review of Smart's Introduction to the Theory of Value.” Economic Journal 2: 336–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1894. “The Theory of International Values, Parts I–III.” Economic Journal 4: 3450, 424–43, 606–38. Reproduced with changes in F. Y. Edgeworth, Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1925, 3–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1897. “Review of Bastable's Theory of International Trade, 2nd edn.” Economic Journal 7: 397403.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1899. “On a Point in the Theory of International Trade.” Economic Journal 9: 125–28.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1900. “Review of Bastable's Theory of International Trade, 3rd edn.” Economic Journal 10: 389–93.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1901. “Disputed Points in the Theory of International Trade.” Economic Journal 11: 582–95.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1908. “Appreciations of Mathematical Theories, Parts III & IV.” Economic Journal 18: 582–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1910. “On the Use of the Differential Calculus to Economics to Determine Conditions of Maximum Advantage.” Scientia 7: 80103. Reprinted in F. Y. Edgeworth, Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1925, 367–86.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1923. “Review of Marshall's Money, Credit and Commerce.” Economic Journal 33: 198204.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, . 1925. Papers Relating to Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Findlay, R. 1974. “Relative Prices, Growth and Trade in a Simple Ricardian System.” Economica 41: 113.Google Scholar
Gomes, L. 1990. Neoclassical International Economics: An Historical Survey. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. D. W. 1966. Economic Enquiry in Australia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Haberler, G. 1930. “Die Theorie der Komparativen Kosten und Ihre Auswertung fur die Begrundung des Freihandels.” Weltwirtschaftiches Archiv 32: 349–70. Translated as “The Theory of Comparative Costs and its Use in the Defense of Free Trade.” In A.C.Y. Koo, ed., Selected Essays of Gottfried Haberler. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1978. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1865. The Coal Question. References are to the third edition (1906), edited by A. W. Flux. Reprinted New York: Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1869. “Inaugural Address as President of the Manchester Statistical Society.” Reprinted in W.S. Jevons, Methods of Social Reform, and Other Papers. London: Macmillan, 1883, 180–93.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1870. “Opening Address as President of Section F of the British Association.” Reprinted in W.S. Jevons, Methods of Social Reform, and Other Papers. London: Macmillan, 1883, 194216.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1879. The Theory of Political Economy, 2nd edn., as reproduced in Black (1970).Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1970. The Theory of Political Economy, edited by Black, R. D. C.. Harmondsworth Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jones, R. W. 1971. “A Three Factor Model in Theory, Trade and History.” In J. N. Bhagwati, et al., Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1924. “Alfred Marshall.” Reprinted in A.C. Pigou, ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan, 1925, 165.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. 1933. “The Use of Indifference Curves in the Analysis of Foreign Trade.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 47: 493503.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. 1932. “The Diagrammatical Representation of Cost Conditions in International Trade.” Economica 12: 346–56.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. 1936. “The Symmetry between Import and Export Taxes.” Economica 16: 306–13.Google Scholar
Maneschi, A. and Thweatt, W. O.. 1987. “Barone's 1908 Representation of an Economy's Trade Equilibrium and the Gains from Trade.” Journal of International Economics 22: 375–82.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1872. “Mr Jevons' Theory of Political Economy.” Reprinted in A.C. Pigou, ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan, 1925, 9399.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1879. “The Pure Theory of Foreign Trade.” Reprinted in J.K. Whitaker, The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, vol. 2. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society, 1975, 117–81.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1881. “Review of Edgeworth's Mathematical Psychics.” The Academy. Reprinted in J.K. Whitaker, The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, vol. 2. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society, 1975, 265–68.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1890. The Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1961. The Principles of Economics, ninth variorum edition with the same pagination as the eighth (1920) and a volume of notes by C. W. Guillebaud. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mason, E. S. 1926. “The Doctrine of Comparative Cost.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38: 582606.Google Scholar
Metzler, L. A. 1948. “The Theory of International Trade.” In Ellis, H. S., ed., A Survey of Contemporary Economics. Philadelphia: Blakiston.Google Scholar
Mill, J. 1821/2/6. Elements of Political Economy. Reprinted in D. N. Winch, ed., James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1844. “Of the Laws of Interchange between Nations; and the Distribution of the Gains of Commerce among the Countries of the Commercial World.” In J.S. Mill, Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. Reprinted in J.S. Mill, Essays on Economics and Society, vol. 1, edited by J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Ashley, W. J.. London: Longmans, 1909.Google Scholar
Ohlin, B. 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peart, S. 1996. The Economics of W. S. Jevons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C., ed. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, . 1932. “The Effect of Reparations on the Ratio of International Interchange.” Economic Journal 42: 532–43.Google Scholar
Pigou, . 1947. A Study in Public Finance, 3rd Edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1815. “An Essay on the Effects of a Low Price of Corn on the Pro. ts of Stock etc.” Reprinted in P. Sraffa, ed., Works & Correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, . 1817/19/21. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, variorum edition edited by Sraffa, P., Works & Correspondence of D. Ricardo vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1971. “An Exact Hume-Ricardo-Marshall Model of International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 1: 118.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Smart, W. 1891. An Introduction to the Theory of Value on the Lines of Menger, Wieser, and Böhm-Bawerk. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. 1959. “An Afterthought on the ‘Real Cost-Opportunity Cost’ Dispute and Some Aspects of General Equilibrium Under Conditions of Variable Factor Supplies.” Review of Economic Studies 17: 198208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
White, M. V. 1982. “Jevons in Australia: A Reassessment.” Economic Record 58, 3245.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 2 volumes. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Whitaker, , ed. 1990. Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. 1888. An Alphabet of Economic Science. Reprinted New York: Kelley, 1955.Google Scholar