Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T17:15:24.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Mandeville Useful Today? A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

David Levy
David Levy
Affiliation:
Center of Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Winter 1987 , pp. 51 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Diamond, Arthur, “Does Mandeville Matter Today.” History of Economics Society Bulletin.” 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundert, E. J. “Bernard Mandeville and the Rhetoric of Social Science.” Journal of the History of Behaviorial Sciences 12 (1986): 311–320.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David. “Adam Smith and the Texas A&M Rats.” Public Choice Working Paper, 1986a.Google Scholar
Levy, David. “S. T. Coleridge Responds to Adam Smith's ‘Pernicious Opinion.’” Interpretation 14 (1986b): 89–114.Google Scholar
Levy, David. “Rational Choice and Morality.” History of Political Economy 14 (1982): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David. “Utility-Enhancing Consumption Constraints.” Economics and Philosophy 1987, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K.Sociology of Science. Edited by Storer, Norman W.. Chicago, 1973.Google Scholar
Rashid, Salim. “Mandeville's Fable: Laissez-Faire or Libertinism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 18 (1985): 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George. “Does Economics Have a Useful Past,” History of Political Economy 1 (1969): 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George. The Theory of Price. Third edition. New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen M. “Simon Newcomb, Percy Daniell, and the History of Robust Estimation.” 68 Journal of the American Statistical Association (1973): 872–879.Google Scholar