Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:57:20.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTRODUCTION TO SYMPOSIUM: ECONOMISTS IN COURT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2020

Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche Open the ORCID record for Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Economists in Court
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 199 - 202
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

CRASSH, University of Cambridge. This series of papers was first presented at a workshop held in September 2017 at the Walras-Pareto Centre, bringing together historians of economics, economists, and forensic scientists. In addition to the participants, I would like to warmly thank Harro Maas for his work and support in the publication of this symposium.

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger, and Cherrier, Béatrice. 2017. “The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics since the 1970s.” Supplement, History of Political Economy 49.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, Ollion, Etienne, and Algan, Yann. 2015. “The Superiority of Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, Tal. 1999. “The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in the English Courtroom.” Science in Context 12 (1): 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, Tal. 2008. “Revisiting the History of Scientific Expert Testimony.” Brooklyn Law Review 73 (3): 879–942.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan. 2015. “The Expert Witness: Lessons from the U.S. Experience.” Humana.mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies 28: 39–70.Google Scholar
Mandel, Michael J. 1999. “Going for the Gold: Economists as Expert Witnesses.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2): 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Jennifer L. 2007. “Idealizing Science and Demonizing Experts: An Intellectual History of Expert Evidence.” Villanova Law Review 52: 763–801.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1999. “The Law and Economics of Economic Expert Witness.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2): 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Robert, and Ward, John. 1999. “The Economist in Tort Litigation.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2): 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Wendell Holmes. 1897. “The Path of Law.” Harvard Law Review 10 (8): 457–478.Google Scholar