Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:55:05.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF ECONOPHYSICS IN THE SHADOW OF PHYSICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Y. GINGRAS  and
C. SCHINCKUS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Econophysics presents itself as a new paradigm and a new specialty (or even a discipline) using various models and concepts imported from condensed matter and statistical physics to analyze economic and financial phenomena. Given that econophysics is based on different fundamental assumptions from those of mainstream economics, the disciplinary position of econophysics is not so clear. In this perspective, this paper will analyze the progressive institutionalization of econophysics using bibliometric methods to identify core authors as well as the structure of the disciplines with which econophysics is closely related.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 109 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Artemi, C. 2009. “From Econophysics to Politics.” Working paper. Scientific High School, Orvieto.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. 2000. “A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 263–273.Google Scholar
Bell, D., and Kristol, I., eds. 1981. The Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J-P. 2002. “An Introduction to Statistical Finance.” Physica A 313: 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brandouy, O. 2005. “Complexité et phénomènes critiques en finance.” In Bourghelle, D., Brandouy, O., Gillet, R., and Orléan, A., eds., Croyances, Représentations Collectives et Conventions en Finance. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Burda, Z., Jukiewicz, J., and Nowak, M.. 2003. “Is Econophysics a Solid Sciences?” Working paper. Institute of Physicis, Jagellonian University, Cracovie.Google Scholar
Colander, D., Follmer, H., Haas, A., Godber, M., Juselius, K., Kirman, A., Lux, T., and Slot, B.. 2008. “The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Finance.” 98th Dahlem Workshop on Modeling of Financial Markets., University of Kiel, Working Papers with number 1489.Google Scholar
De liso, N., and Filatrella, G.. 2002. “Econophysics: The Emergence of a New Field?” Working paper of PRIN (Progretto di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale), no 2-AT4.Google Scholar
Fama, E.F. 1963. “Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis.” Journal of Business 36 (4): 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E.F. 1965. “Portfolio Analysis in a Stable Paretian Market.” Management Science 11, 3 (Series A, Sciences): 404–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E.F. 1976. Foundations of Finance: Portfolio Decisions and Securities Prices. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Farmer, D., and Lux, T.. 2008. “Introduction to Special Issue on Application of Statistical Physics in Economics and Finance.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galam, S. 2004. “Sociophysics: A Personal Testimony.” Physica A 336 (2): 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallegati, M. 1990. “Financial Instability, Income Distribution and the Stock Market.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 12 (3): 356–374.Google Scholar
Gallegati, M. 1994. “Composition Effect and Economic Fluctuations.” Economics Letters 44 (1–2): 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallegati, M., and Dardi, M.. 1992. “Alfred Marshall on Speculation.” History of Political Economy 24 (3): 571–594.Google Scholar
Gallegati, M., Keen, S., Lux, T., and Ormerod, P.. 2006. “Worrying Trends in Econophysics.” Physica A 370: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoiu, G., and Ion, I.. 2007. “Some Relevant Econophysics. Moments of History, Definitions, Methods, Models and New Trends.” Romanian Economic and Business Review 3 (3): 29–41.Google Scholar
Gingras, Y. 1991. “L’institutionnalisation de la recherche en milieu universitaire et ses effets.” Sociologie et sociétés 23 (1): 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedenko, B., and Kolmogorov, A.. 1954. Limit Distributions for Stums of Independent Random Variables. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Maes, I., and Buyst, E.. 2005. “Migration and Americanization: The Special Case of Belgian Economics.” European Journal of History of Economic Thought 12 (1): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingrao, B., and Israel, G.. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Israel, G. 2005. “The Science of Complexity: Epistemological Problems and Perspectives.” Science in Context 18: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, F. 2008. “The Construction of the Canonical History of Financial Economics.” History of Political Economy 40 (2): 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, F., and Schinckus, C.. 2010a. “History of Econophysics as a New Approach in Modern Financial Theory.” Working paper. University of Québec at Montréal.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, F. 2010b. “Econophysics: A New Challenge for Financial Economics?” Working paper. University of Québec at Montréal.Google Scholar
Kirman, A. 1989. “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Economic Journal 99 (395): 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutner, R., and Grech, D.. 2008. “Report on Foundation and Organization of Econophysics Graduate Courses at Faculty of Physics of University of Warsaw and Department of Physics and Astronomy of the Wrocław University.” Acta Physica Polonica A 114 (3): 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, P. 1924. “Théorie des erreurs: la loi de Gauss et les lois exceptionnelles.” Bulletion de la SMF 2 (1): 49–85.Google Scholar
Lux, T. 1992a. “The Sequential Trading Approach to Disequilibrium Dynamics.” Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik, 209 (1): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lux, T. 1992b. “A Note on the Stability of Endogenous Cycles in Diamond’s Model of Search and Barter.” Journal of Economics 56 (2): 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lux, T., and Franke, R.. 1992. “Adaptive Expectations and Perfect Foresight in a Nonlinear Metzlerian Model of the Inventory Cycle.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95 (2): 355–363.Google Scholar
Lux, T., and Ausloos, M.. 2002. “Market Fluctuations I: Scaling, Multiscaling, and Their Possible Origins.” In Bunde, A., Kropp, J., and Schnellnhuber, H., eds., The Science of Disasters: Climate Disruptions, Heart Attacks and Market Crashes. Berlin: Springer, pp. 373–409.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. 1963. “The Variation of Some Other Speculative Prices.” Journal of Business 40: 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. 1997. Fractals, Hasard et Finance. Paris: Flammarion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B., and Taylor, H.. 1965. “On the Distribution of Stock Price Differences.” Operations Research 15 (6): 1057–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B., and Walis, J.. 1968. “Noah, Joseph and Operational Hydrology.” Water Resources Research 4 (1): 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, B., and Hudson, R.. 2004. The (Mis)Behavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin, and Reward. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Mantegna, R. 1991. “Levy Walks and Enhanced Diffusion in Milan Stock Exchange.” Physica A 179 (1): 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantegna, R., and Stanley, E.. 2000. An introduction to Econophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance 7 (1):77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M. 1959. Portfolio Selection; Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCauley, J. 2004. Dynamics of Markets: Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, J. 2006. “Response to ‘Worrying Trends in Econophysics.’” Physica A 371: 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light. Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosini, Valeria , ed. 2007. Equilibrium in Economics: Scope and Limits. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okuyama, K., Takayasu, M., and Takayasu, H.. 1999. “Zipf’s Law in Income Distribution of Companies.” Physica A 269: 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, V. 1897. Cours d’Economie Politique. Genève Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Pieters, R., and Baumgartner, H.. 2002. “Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peinke, J., Siefert, M., Barth, S., Renner, C., Riess, F., Wächter, M., and Friedrich, R.. 2004. Fat Tail Statistics and Beyond. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickles, D. 2007. “Econophysics for Philosophers.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (4): 948–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickles, D. 2008. “Econophysics and the Complexity of the Financial Markets.” In Collier, J. and Hooker, C., eds., Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 10: Philosophy and Complex Systems. New York: North Holland Elsevier Editions.Google Scholar
Roehner, B. 2002. Patterns of Speculation: A Study in Observational Econophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, B. Jr. 2007. “Econophysics and Economics Complexity.” Working paper. James Madison University, Harrisonburg.Google Scholar
Rosser, B. Jr. 2008. “Debating the Role of Econophysics.” Working paper. James Madison University, Harrisonburg.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. 1965. “Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.” Industrial Management Review 6: 41–50.Google Scholar
Săvoiu, Gheorghe, and Iorga–Simăn, Ion. 2008. “Some Relevant Econophysics’ Moments of History, Definitions, Methods, Models and New Trends.” Romanian Economic and Business Review 3 (3): 29–41.Google Scholar
Schinckus, C. 2009a. “Economic Uncertainty and Econophysics.” Physica A 388 (20): 4414–4423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, C. 2009b. “L’émergence de la finance comportementale.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 20: 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, C. 2010a. “What Can Econophysics Contribute to Economics?” Working paper. University of Québec at Montréal.Google Scholar
Schinckus, C. 2010b. “Econophysics and Economics: Sister Disciplines?” American Journal of Physics 78 (4): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, C. 2010c. “Is Econophysics a New discipline? A Neopositivist Argument.” Physica A 389: 3814–3821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Science and Engineering Resources, SER . 2000. “Science and Engineering Indicators.” Report of the National Science Board and the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Schoutens, Wim . 2003. Lévy Processes in Finance. New York: Wiley Finance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, H., Afanasyev, V., Aamaral, L.A.N., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Mantegna, R., Peng, C.-K., Prince, P.A., Salinger, M.A., Stanley, M.H.R., and Viswanathan, G.M.. 1996. “Anomalous Fluctuations in the Dynamics of Complex Systems: From DNA and Physiology to Econophysics.” Physica A 224, 302–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, H., Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., and Plerou, V.. 2007. “Economic Fluctuations and Statistical Physics: Quantifying Extremely Rare and Less Rare Events in Finance.” Physica A 382: 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viswanathan, G., Fulco, U., and Lyra, M.. 2003. “The Origin of Fat-tailed Distributions in Financial Time Series.” Physica A 329 (1–2): 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withley, R. 1986. “The Structure and Context of Economics as Scientific Field.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 4: 179–209.Google Scholar
Yegorov, Y. 2007. “Econo-physics: A Perspective of Matching Two Sciences.” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 4 (1): 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar