Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:24:06.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hollander on the “Canonical Classical Growth Model”: A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Eltis, Walter. 1980. “Malthus' Theory of Effective Demand and Growth.” Oxford Economic Papers 32: 19–56.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1984. “The Wage Path in Classical Growth Theory: Ricardo, Malthus and Mill.” Oxford Economic Papers 36: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1998. “The Canonical, Classical Growth Model: Content, Adherence and Priority.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20, (3): 253–77.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Literature 16 (12): 1415–34.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, eds., Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S., Todd, W. B., 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1998. “Notes Towards an Un-Canonical, Pre-Classical Model of Political Œconomy.” Paper presented at conference on The Canon in Economics, in honor of Samuel Hollander.Toronto27 September.Google Scholar