Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:41:51.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“THE HISTORY OF ECONOMICS IS WHAT HISTORIANS OF ECONOMICS DO:” A RECONSIDERATION OF RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

STEVEN G. MEDEMA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: In Memory of Bob Coats
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 384 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger. E. and Biddle, Jeff, eds. 2000. Toward a History of Applied Economics. Annual Supplement to Vol. 32, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred W. “Bob”. 1969. “Research Priorities in the History of Economics.” History of Political Economy 1 (1): 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, Alfred W. “Bob”. 1992. On the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 1 of British and American Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred W. “Bob”. 1993. On the Sociology and Professionalization of Economics, Vol. 2 of British and American Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred W. “Bob”, ed. 1999. The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. 2000. “Economic Man in the Garden of Eden.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (December): 405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 2001. “How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Debating Racial Quackery.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (March): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G., Cardoso, José Luís, and Lodewijks, John. 2002. “Heaven Can Wait: Gatekeeping in an Age of Uncertainty, Innovation, and Commercialization.” In The Future of the History of Economics: History of Political Economy Annual Supplement 34: 190–207.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2000. “Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (September): 277–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. 1974. “The History of Economic Thought as Intellectual History.” History of Political Economy 6 (3): 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 2001. “A Modern Post-Mortem on Böhm's Capital Theory: Its Vital Normative Flaw Shared by Pre-Sraffian Mainstream Capital Theory.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (September): 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2007. “Economic Science Wars.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29 (September): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy and Gayer, Ted. 2001. “Equilibrium Proofmaking.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (December): 421–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar