Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:24:28.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometric Population Increase: A Note on Priority of Usage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Geoffrey Gilbert
Geoffrey Gilbert
Affiliation:
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps the most notorious choice of words ever made by an economist was the pair of mathematical terms used by Malthus to describe the maximum possible rates of increase in population and subsistence: “geometric” to describe population growth, and “arithmetic” to describe the growth of subsistence. If Malthus could have foreseen the linguistic and logical difficulties entailed by the geometric-arithmetic distinction, he might have looked for different adjectives. But what a loss to the “bravura” style of the Essay on Population so admired by Keynes! Consider the rhetorical impact of: “Population tends to increase at an exponential rate higher than the rate at which the food supply increases.” Is this the language of an economic classic?

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1989 , pp. 296 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hale, Sir Matthew, (1677). The Primitive Origination of Mankind considered and examined according to the Light of Reason. London.Google Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew (1683). Discourse touching Provision for the Poor. London.Google Scholar
Hartwick, John M., (1988). “Robert Wallace and Malthus and the Ratios.” History of Political Economy, 20: 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, E.P., (1967). The Population Debate: The Development of Conflicting Theories up to 1900. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sadler, Michael, (1830). The Law of Population: A Treatise in Six Books, etc. London.Google Scholar
Whiston, William, (1696). A New Theory of the Earth, etc. London.Google Scholar