Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:16:29.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frederic S. Lee and Marc Lavoie, eds., In Defense of Post-Keynesian and Heterodox Economics: Responses to Their Critics (London and New York: Routledge, 2013), pp. x, 263, $135 (cloth). ISBN 978-0-415-69436-0.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Don Mathews
Don Mathews*
Affiliation:
School of Business and Public AffairsCollege of Coastal Georgia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 260 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Colander, D., Holt, Richard P. F., and Barkley Rosser, J. Jr. 2004. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499.Google Scholar
Colander, D., Holt, Richard P. F., and Barkley Rosser, J. Jr. 2007–08. “Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics.” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 30 (2): 303–312.Google Scholar
Colander, D., Holt, Richard P. F., and Barkley Rosser, J. Jr. 2010. “How to Win Friends and (Possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists.” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 32 (3): 397–408.Google Scholar