Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:08:29.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium and Disequilibrium Dynamics in the 1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Carlo Zappia
Carlo Zappia*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Siena, Italy.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Notwithstanding considerable efforts by at least two generations of economic theorists, the state of art of general equilibrium theory in the Arrow-Debreu framework is still extremely unsatisfactory, especially with respect to the treatment of the time dimension. Indeed, it is now taken for granted even among general equilibrium theorists that, to play a significant role, equilibrium analysis must account for individual agents' expectations about the uncertain future, and that the Arrow-Debreu procedure of collapsing the entire decision process at an initial date is to be interpreted, at most, as a counterfactual argument, the main message of the Arrow-Debreu approach being that “one cannot argue that markets co-ordinate activity if there are many of them missing” (Hahn 1995, p. 12).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 55 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allgoewer, Elisabeth. 1997. “Hicks on Economic Theory in Time.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (Fall): 222–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1987. “Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System.” In Hogarth, Robin M. and Reder, Melvin W., eds., Rational Choice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Birner, Jack. 1996. “Mind, Market and Society: Network Structures in the Work of F. A. Hayek.” Trento: CEEL Working Paper 1996–02, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Birner, Jack. 1999. “The Surprising Place of Cognitive Psychology In the Work of F. A. Hayek.” History of Economic Ideas 7: 43–84.Google Scholar
Boehm, Stephen. 1986. “Time and Equilibrium Hayek's Notion of Intertemporal Equilibrium Reconsidered.” In Kirzner, Israel M., ed., Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Boettke, Peter J. 1998. “Economic Calculation: the Austrian Contribution to Political Economy.” Advances in Austrian Economics 5: 135–51.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1988. “Hayek's Transformation.” History of Political Economy 20: 513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1994. “Hayek's Scientific Subjectivism.” Economics and Philosophy 10: 305–13.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce. 1997. “Hayek and Socialism.” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 1856–90.Google Scholar
Currie, Martin and Steedman, Ian. 1990. Wrestling with Time. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Franklin M. 1989. “Adjustment Processes and Stability.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: General Equilibrium. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foss, Nicolai J. 1995. “More on ‘Hayek's Transformation.’” History of Political Economy 27: 345–64.Google Scholar
Grandmont, Jean-Michel. 1982. “Temporary General Equilibrium Theory.” In Arrow, Kenneth J. and Intriligator, Michael D., eds., Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. II. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Grandmont, Jean-Michel. 1987. “Introduction.” In Grandmont, J. M., ed., Temporary Equilibrium: Selected Readings. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1973. “On the Notion of Equilibrium In Economics.” In Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1994. “John Hicks the Theorist.” In Hagemann, H. and Hamouda, O. F., eds., The Legacy of Hicks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1995. “General Equilibrium For Intellectual Historians.” Mimeo. Paper presented at the Siena Meeting of European Society for the History of Economic Thought, Siena.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. and Takashi, Negishi. 1962. “A Theorem of Non-tâtonnement Stability.” Econometrica 30 (07): 463–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamouda, Omar F. 1990. “Hicks's Changing Views on Economic Dynamics.” In Moggridge, Donald E., ed., Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hansson, Bjorn A. 1982. The Stockholm School and the Development of Dynamic Method. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hansson, Bjorn A. 1991. “The Stockholm School and the Development of Dynamic Method.” In Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1928. “Das Intertemporal Gleichgewichtssystem der Preise und die Bewegungen des ‘Geldwerts.’” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 28: 33–76. (English translation as “Intertemporal Price Equilibrium and Movements In the Value of Money.” In F. A. Hayek, Money, Capital and Fluctuations: Early Essays, edited by Roy McCloughry. London: Routledge 1984).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935. “Preiserwartungen, Monetare Storungen und Fehlinvestitionen.” Nationalökonomisk Tidsskrift 73. (English translation as “Price Expectations, Monetary Disturbances and Malinvestments.” In F. A. Hayek. Profit, Interest and Investment and Other Essays on the Theory of Industrial Fluctuations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1939).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Reprinted in F A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1941. The Pure Theory of Capital. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1942. “Scientism and the Study of Society.” In F. A. Hayek, The Counter-Revolution of Science. Chicago: The Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge In Society.” Reprinted in F A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1946. “Individualism: True and False.” Reprinted in F A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. “The Meaning of Competition.” Reprinted in F A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 1976.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1952. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry Into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1968. “Competition As a Discovery Procedure.” In F. A. Hayek, New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1976. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. III. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1933. “Gleichgewitcht und Konjunktur.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4: 441–55. (English translation as “Equilibrium and the Trade Cycle.” In J. R. Hicks Money, Interest and Wages: Collected Essays in Economic Theory, Vol. II. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1935. “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money.” In J. R. Hicks Money, Interest and Wages: Collected Essays in Economic Theory, Vol. II. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1956. “Methods of Dynamic Analysis.” In J. R. Hicks Money, Interest and Wages: Collected Essays in Economic Theory, Vol. II. Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1982.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1965. Capital and Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1982. Money, Interest and Wages: Collected Essays in Economic Theory, Vol. II. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1991. “The Swedish Influence on Value and Capital.” In Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel M. 1992. The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klausinger, Hans J. 1990. “Equilibrium Methodology As Seen From an Hayekian Perspective.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12: 61–75.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1986. The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. 1985. “Knowledge and Rationality in the Austrian School: An Analytical Survey.” Eastern Economic Journal 9: 309–30.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Erik. 1929. “Prisbildningsproblemets Uppläggning från Kapitalteoretisk Synpunkt.” Ekonomisk Tidskrift (English translation as “The Place of Capital in the Theory of Price.” In E. Lindahl, Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1939).Google Scholar
Lindahl, Erik. 1930. Penningpolitikens Medel. (Partial English translation as “The Rate of Interest and the Price Level.” In E. Lindahl, Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1939).Google Scholar
Lindahl, Erik. 1939a. Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Erik. 1939b. “The Dynamic Approach to Economic Theory.” In E. Lindahl, Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Littlechild, Stephen C. 1982. “Equilibrium and the Market Process.” In Kirzner, Israel M., ed., Method, Process and Austrian Economics. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Magill, Michael and Quinzii, Martine. 1996. Theory of Incomplete Markets. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1939. Monetary Equilibrium. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
Moss, Lawrence S. 1994. “Hayek and the Several Faces of Socialism.” In Colonna, Marina, Hagemann, Harald, and Hamouda, Omar F., eds., Capitalism, Socialism and Knowledge: The Economics of F. A. Hayek, Vol. II. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, Gerald P. and Rizzo, Mario J.. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Petri, Fabio. 1991. “Hicks's Recantation of the Temporary Equilibrium Method.” Review of Political Economy 3: 268–88.Google Scholar
Rampa, Giorgio. 1999. “Social Systems As Nets of Networks.” Quaderni dell'Istituto di Scienze Economiche. University of Genova.Google Scholar
Scarf, Herbert. 1960. “Some Examples of Global Instability of tiie Competitive Equilibrium.” International Economic Review 1: 157–72.Google Scholar
Salmon, Mark. 1995. “Bounded Rationality and Learning: Procedura Learning.” In Kirman, Alan and Salmon, Mark, eds., Learning and Rationality in Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry. 1997. “The Connectionist Mind: A Study of Hayekian Psychology.” In Frowen, Stephen F., ed., Hayek: Economist and Social Philosopher. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Karen. I. 1999. “Hayek's Theory of the Market Order as an Instance of the Theory of Complex, Adaptive Systems.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines. 9: 241–56.Google Scholar
Zappia, Carlo. 1996. “The Notion of Private Information in a Modern Perspective: A Reappraisal of Hayek's Contribution.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 3: 107–131.Google Scholar
Zappia, Carlo. 1997. “Private Information, Contractual Arrangements and Hayek's Knowledge Problem.” In Keizer, Willem, Tieben, Bert, and Van Zijp, Rudy, eds., Austrians in Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar