Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:39:02.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ECONOPHYSICS: A NEW CHALLENGE FOR FINANCIAL ECONOMICS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2013

FRANCK JOVANOVIC  and
CHRISTOPHE SCHINCKUS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Financial economics was born in the 1960s. It took less than two decades for the new discipline’s main theoretical results to become established, creating what is considered to be mainstream financial economics. Less than thirty years later, a new field of research called “econophysics” was created. This field aims to reinvent modern financial theory and, indirectly, financial economics.

This article proposes to study, by an historical analysis, to what extent econophysics today could constitute one of the major theoretical challenges to financial economics. It shows how these two fields have historical similarities, and analyzes how these similarities call the future evolution of financial theory into question.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 319 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Stephen H. 1968. “Introduction.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 3 (3): 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachelier, Louis. 1900. “Théorie de la spéculation.” Reproduced in Annales de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 3ème série 17(January): 21–86. Reprint, 1995, J. Gabay, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Philip. 2006. “Econophysics: Culture Crash.” Nature 441, 7094: 686–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, Brad, and Odean, Terrance. 2001. “The Internet and the Investor.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (1): 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberousse, Anouk, and Ludvig, Pascal. 2000. “Les modèles comme fictions.” Philosophie 68 (Décembre): 16–43.Google Scholar
Belkacem, Lotfi. 1996. Processus stables et applications en finance. Université Paris IX Dauphine: Paris.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Peter L. 1992. Capital Ideas: The Improbable Origins of Modern Wall Street. New York and Toronto: Free Press; Maxwell Macmillan Canada; Maxwell Macmillan International.Google Scholar
Bingham, Nicholas Hugh. 2005. “Doob: A Half-century On.” Journal of Applied Probabilities 42 (1): 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe, and Potters, Marc. 2003. Theory of Financial Risk and Derivate Pricing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe, and Potters, Marc. 2002. “An Introduction to Statistical Finance.” Physica A 313 (1): 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandouy, Olivier. 2005. “Complexité et phénomènes critiques en finance.” In Bourghelle, David, Brandouy, Olivier, Gillet, Roland, and Orléan, André, eds., Croyances, Représentations Collectives et Conventions en Finance. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Bucsa, Gigel, Jovanovic, Franck, and Schinckus, Christophe. 2010. “A Unified Model for Price Return Distributions Used in Econophysics.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 390 (20): 3435–3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burda, Zdzislaw, Jurkiewicz, Jerzy, and Nowak, Maciej A.. 2003. “Is Econophysics a Solid Science?” Acta Physica Polonica B 34 (1): 87.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challet, Damien, Marsili, Mateo, et al. 2005. Minority Games: Interacting Agents in Financial Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clegg, Richard. 2006. “A Practical Guide to Measuring the Hurst Parameter.” International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science & Technology 7 (1): 3–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, Kalman J., and Pogue, Jerry A.. 1967. “An Empirique Evaluation of Alternative Portfolio-Selection Models.” Journal of Business 40 (2): 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cootner, Paul H. 1964. The Random Character of Stock Market Prices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cowles, Alfred. 1933. “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?” Econometrica 1 (3): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Alfred., and Jones, Herbert E.. 1937. “Some A Posteriori Probabilities in Stock Market Action.” Econometrica 5 (3): 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Mark, and Etheridge, Alison. 2006. Louis Bachelier’s Theory of Speculation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Engle, Robert, and Russell, Jeff. 2004. “Analysis of High Frequency Financial Data.” University of Chicago Working Paper.Google Scholar
Engle, Robert F. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” Econometrica 50 (4): 987–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1963. “Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis.” Journal of Business 36 (4): 420–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1965a. “Portfolio Analysis in a Stable Paretian Market.” Management Science 11 (3): 404–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1965b. “The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices.” Journal of Business 38 (1): 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1965c. “Random Walks in Stock-Market Prices.” Financial Analysts Journal 21 (5): 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F. 2008. Interview with Professor Eugene Fama by Professor Richard Roll. The American Finance Association’s website.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., and Miller, Merton H.. 1972. The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Farmer, Doyne, and Geanakoplos, John. 2009. “The Virtues and Vices of Equilibrium, and the Future of Financial Economics.” Complexity (Jan/Feb 2009), 14 (3): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Doyne and Lux, Thomas. 2008. “Introduction” to special issue Application of Statistical Physics in Economics and Finance. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, William. 1971. An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fisher, Lawrence, and Lorie, James H.. 1964. “Rates of Return on Investments in Common Stocks.” Journal of Business 37 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, and Khurana, Rakesh. 2009. “From Social Control to Financial Economics: The Linked Ecologies of Economics and Business in Twentieth-Century America.” Working Paper, Harvard Business School.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrikson, E. Bruce. [1965] 1971. Frontiers of Investment Analysis. Scranton, PA: International Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Frickel, Scott, and Gross, Neil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Uriel, Shlesinger, Michael, et al. 1994. Lévy Flight and Related Topics in Physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gallegati, Mauro, Keen, Steve, et al. 2006. “Worrying Trends in Econophysics.” Physica A 370 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingras, Yves, and Schinckus, Christophe. 2012. “Institutionalization of Econophysics in the Shadow of Physics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34 (1): 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedenko, , Vladimirovich, Boris, and Kolmogorov, Andrei N.. 1954. Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gupta, Hari, and Campanha, José. 1999. “The Gradually Truncated Lévy Flight for Systems with Power-Law Distributions.” Physica A 268: 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Hari, and Campanha, José. 2002. “Tsallis Statistics and Gradually Truncated Lévy Flight—Distribution of an Economic Index.” Physica A 309 (4): 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. Michael, and Kreps, David M.. 1979. “Martingales and Arbitrage in Multiperiod Securities Markets.” Journal of Economic Theory 20 (3): 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. Michael, and Pliska, Stanley R.. 1981. “Martingales and Stochastic Integrals in the Theory of Continuous Trading.” Stochastic Processes and their Applications 11 (3): 215–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffland, D. L. 1967. “The Folklore of Wall Street.” Financial Analysts Journal 23 (3): 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Charles, and Davis, Douglas. 2005. Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Jing-Zhi, and Wu, Liuren. 2004. “Specification Analysis of Option Pricing Based on Time-Changed Lévy Process.” Econometrica 59 (3): 1405–1439.Google Scholar
Jean, William H. 1970. The Analytical Theory of Finance; A Study of the Investment Decision Process of the Individual and the Firm. New York: Holt, Rinehart.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C. 1978. “Some Anomalous Evidence regarding Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 6 (2–3): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Guorong, Tang, Nancy, et al. 2002. Electronic Trading in Hong Kong and Its Impact on Market Functioning. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2000. “L’origine de la théorie financière: une réévaluation de l’apport de Louis Bachelier.” Revue d’Economie Politique 110 (3): 395–418.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2001. “Pourquoi l’hypothèse de marche aléatoire en théorie financière? Les raisons historiques d’un choix éthique.” Revue d’Economie Financière 61: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2006. “A Nineteenth-century Random Walk: Jules Regnault and the Origins of Scientific Financial Economics.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics. Volume 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2008. “The Construction of the Canonical History of Financial Economics.” History of Political Economy 40 (2): 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck, ed. 2009a. L’institutionnalisation de l’économie financière: perspectives historiques. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 20 (special issue): 3–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2009b. “Le modèle de marche aléatoire dans l’économie financière de 1863 à 1976.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 20: 81–108.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2010. “Efficient Markets Theory.” In Cont, Rama, ed., Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2012. “Bachelier: Not the Forgotten Forerunner He Has Been Depicted As.” European Journal for the History of Economic Thought 19 (2): 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck, and Schinckus, Christophe. 2013. “The Emergence of Econophysics.” History of Political Economy 45 (3): 443–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck, and Schinckus, Christophe. 2010. Financial Economics’ Birth in 1960s. Working paper.Google Scholar
Keen, Steve. 2003. “Standing on the Toes of Pygmies: Why Econophysics Must Be Careful of the Economic Foundations on Which It Builds.” Physica A 324 (1): 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Maurice George. 1953. “The Analysis of Economic Time-Series. Part I: Prices.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 116: 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Robert E. 1966. “Financial Analysts Seminar.” Financial Analysts Journal 22 (6): 8–9.Google Scholar
Kou, S. 2008. “Lévy Process in Asset Pricing.” Columbia University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kutner, Ryszard, and Grech, Dariusz. 2008. “Report on Foundation and Organization of Econophysics Graduate Courses at Faculty of Physics of University of Warsaw and Department of Physics and Astronomy of the Wrocław University.” Acta Physica Polonica A 114 (3): 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, Paul. 1924. “Théorie des erreurs: la loi de Gauss et les lois exceptionnelles.” Bulletion de la SMF 2 (1): 49–85.Google Scholar
Lorie, James H. 1966. “Some Comments on Recent Quantitative and Formal Research on the Stock Market.” Journal of Business 39 , 1(Part 2: Supplement on Security Prices): 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorie, James H. 1965. “Controversies on the Stock Market.” Selected Papers, Graduate School of Business of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Lorie, James H., and Brealey, Richard A.. 1972. Modern Developments in Investment Management: A Book of Readings. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Louçã, Francisco. 2007. The Years of High Aconometrics. A Short History of the Generation that Reinvented Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald A. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1963. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” Journal of Business 36 (4): 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1965. “Very Long-tailed Probability Distributions and the Empirical Distribution of City Sizes. In Massarik, F. and Ratoosh, P., eds., Mathematical Explanations in Behavioral Science. New York: Homewood Editions, pp. 322–332.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1966. “Forecasts of Future Prices, Unbiased Markets, and ‘Martingale’ Models.” Journal of Business 39 , 1(Part 2): 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1997. Fractals, Hasard et Finance. Paris: Flammarion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 2005. Une approche fractale des marchés. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Mantegna, Rosario N., and Stanley, Eugene H.. 1999. An introduction to Econophysics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, James C. T. 1969. Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1999. “The Early History of Portfolio Theory: 1600–1960.” Financial Analysts Journal 55 (4): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 2004. “Harry Markowitz Interview.”www.afajof.orgGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Mateo, and Zhang, Yi-Chen. 1998. “Econophysics: What Can Physicists Contribute to Economics?” Physics Review Letters 80 (1): 80–85.Google Scholar
Matacz, Andrew. 2000. “Financial Modeling and Option Theory with the Truncated Levy Process.” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 3 (1): 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Joseph L. 2004. Dynamics of Markets: Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Joseph L. 2006. “Response to ‘Worrying Trends in Econophysics.’” Physica A 371 (1): 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrling, Perry. 2005. Fischer Black and the Revolutionary Idea of Finance. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mehrling, Perry. 2012. “Financial Economics.” In Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz, eds., Handbook of the History of Economic Analysis Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert C. 1976. “Option Pricing When Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1–2): 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzenmacher, Michael. 2004. “A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions.” Internet Mathematics 1 (2): 226–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Basil J. 1968. An Introduction to the Theory of Finance; Assetholder Behavior under Uncertainty. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., and Morrison, Margaret, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Robert. 1995. “Thomas Kuhn ou l’apogée de la philosophie historique des sciences”. In Cometti, Jean-Pierre and Tiercelin, Claudine, eds., Actes du colloque du Centre Culturel International de Cerisy-la-Salle sur “Cent ans de philosophie américaine.” http://www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/philuqam/dept/page_perso.php?id=13)Google Scholar
National Science Board. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Arlington: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Pieters, Riek, and Baumgartner, Hans. 2002. “Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 483–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poitras, Geoffrey, ed. 2006. Pioneers of Financial Economics: Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Poitras, Geoffrey, ed. 2010. “Pioneers of Financial Economics: Das Adam Smith Irrelevanzproblem?” History of Economics Review 51 (Winter): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poitras, Geoffrey, and Jovanovic, Franck, eds. 2007. Pioneers of Financial Economics: Twentieth-Century Contributions. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Renfro, Charles G. 2004. “The Early Development of Econometric Modeling Languages.” In Renfro, Charles G., ed., Computational Econometrics: Its Impact on the Development of Quantitative. Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 145–166.Google Scholar
Renfro, Charles G. 2009. The Practice of Econometric Theory: An Examination of the Characteristics of Econometric Computation. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehner, Bertrand. 2002. Patterns of Speculation: A Study in Observational Econophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Lawrence. 1957. “Electronic Computers and Their Place in Securities Analyses.” The Analysts Journal 13 (1): 51–53.Google Scholar
Rosser, Barkley. 2006. “The Nature and Future of Econophysics.” In Chatterjee, Arnab and Chakrabarti, Bikas K., eds., Econophysics of Stock and Other Markets. Milan: Springer, pp. 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, Barkley. 2008a. “Econophysics and Economics Complexity.” Advances in Complex Systems 11 (5): 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, Barkley. 2008b. “Debating the Role of Econophysics.” Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology & Life Sciences 12 (3): 311–323.Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, A. D. 1952. “Safety First and the Holding of Assets.” Econometrica 20 (3): 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Mark. 2002. “Markowitz’s ‘Portfolio Selection’: A Fifty-Year Retrospective.” Journal of Finance 62 (3): 1041–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruelle, David. 1991. Hasard et Chaos. Paris: Editions Odile Jacobs.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1965. “Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly.” Industrial Management Review 6 (2): 41–49.Google Scholar
Schinckus, Christophe. 2009. “La finance comportementale ou le développement d’un nouveau paradigme.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 20: 131–157.Google Scholar
Schinckus, Christophe. 2010a. “Econophysics and Economics: Sister Disciplines?” American Journal of Physics 78 (1): 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, Christophe. 2010b. “Is Econophysics a New Discipline? A Neo-positivist Argument.” Physica A 389: 3814–3821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, Christophe. 2011. “What Can Econophysics Contribute to Financial Economics?” International Review of Economics 58 (2): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinckus, Christophe. 2013. “How Do Econophysicists Make Stable Levy Processes Physically Plausible.” Brazilian Journal of Physics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoutens, Wim. 2003. Lévy Processes in Finance. New York: Wiley Finance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwert, William G. 1989. “Why Does Stock Market Volatility Change Over Time?” Journal of Finance 44 (5): 1115–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Glenn, and Vovk, Vladimir. 2001. Probability and Finance: It’s Only a Game! New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Glenn, and Vovk, Vladimir. 2005. “The Origins and Legacy of Kolmogorov’s Grundbegriffe.” Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. 1981a. “The Use of Volatility Measures in Assessing Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance 36 (2): 291–304.Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert J. 1981b. “Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to Be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?” American Economic Review 71 (3): 421–436.Google Scholar
Sornette, Didier. 2003. “Critical Market Crashes.” Physics Reports 378 (1): 1–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, Tania, and Domingos, Tiago. 2006. “Is Neoclassical Microeconomics Formally Valid? An Approach Based on an Analogy with Equilibrium Thermodynamics.” Ecological Economics 58 (1): 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprowls, Clay. 1963. “Computer Education in the Business Curriculum.” Journal of Business 36 (1): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Eugene, Amaral, N., et al. 1999. “Econophysics: Can Physicists Contribute to the Science of Economics?” Physica A 269 (1): 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Eugene H., Gabaix, Xavier, et al. 2008. “A Statistical Physics View of Financial Fluctuations: Evidence for Scaling Universality.” Physica A 387 (1): 3967–3981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Eugene H., Amaral, Nunes, et al. 2000. “Econophysics: What Can Physicists Contribute to Economics?” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 3 (3): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankov, Peter. 2004. Processus de Lévy en Finance: Problèmes Inverses et Modélisation de dépendance. Ecole Polytechnique de Paris: Paris.Google Scholar
Tijms, Henk. 2004. Understanding Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Von Plato, Jan. 1994. Creating Modern Probability: Its Mathematics, Physics, and Philosophy in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, P., Poon, P. S., et al. 1997. “The Effect of Option Listing on Bid-Ask Spreads, Price Volatility and Trading Activity of the Underlying OTC Stocks.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 9 (2): 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Paul F. 1966. “What Should We Teach in an Investments Course?” Journal of Finance 21 (2): 416–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, J. Fred. 1967. “The State of the Finance Field.” Journal of Finance 22 (4): 539–540.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard Drummond. 1986a. “The Rise of Modern Finance Theory: Its Characteristics as a Scientific Field and Connection to the Changing Structure of Capital Markets.” In Samuels, Warren J., ed., Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Stanford: JAI Press Inc., pp. 147–178.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard Drummond. 1986b. “The Structure and Context of Economics as a Scientific Field.” In Samuels, Warren J., ed., Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Stanford: JAI Press Inc., pp. 179–209.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1934. “A Random-Difference Series for Use in the Analysis of Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 29: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Hsiu-Kwang, and Zakon, Alan J.. 1965. Elements of Investments. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Zolotarev, Mikhail Ivanovich. 1986. “One-dimensional Stable Distributions.” American Mathematical Society (Translations of Mathematical Monographs), Vol. 65. Special Issue. http://www.amazon.com/One-Dimensional-Distributions-Translations-Mathematical-Monographs/dp/0821845195Google Scholar