Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T18:06:13.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Sociology: The Recursive Economic System of J. S. Mill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Amos Witztum
Amos Witztum
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Business and International Finance, London Metropolitan University, 31 Jewry Street, London EC3N 2EY, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper, R. Ekelund and D. Walker (1996) argue that, “[i]ncentives, utilitarian principles, and the diffusion of property rights are the key to understanding Mill on the statics and dynamics of ‘equity and justice’”(p. 576). Their paper, which deals with John Stuart Mill's views on taxation, reads very much like a modern defense of popular capitalism. From the static point of view, it is imperative not to interfere with the internal relationship between economic variables and thus, distort incentives (proportional income tax). From the dynamic point of view, “inheritance taxes [are] the essential mechanism of an evolutionary change towards an efficiently functioning capitalism” (p. 578, italics added).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 251 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berger, F. R. (1984) Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of J S Mill (Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. (1980) The Methodology of Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Brown, D. G. (1972) Mill on Liberty and Morality, The Philosophical Review, 81, pp. 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, R. and Tollison, R. (1976) The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill: The Means to Social Justice, Canadian Journal of Economics, 9 (2), pp. 213–31.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R. and Walker, D. (1996) J. S. Mill on Income Tax Exmption and Inheritance Taxes: the Evidence Reconsidered, History of Political Economy, 28 (4), pp. 559–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1992) The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. (1985) The Economics of J. S. Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. (1978) On Revolution and Progress in Economic Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. (1876) On the Philosophical Method of Political Economy, in: Essays in Political Economy (New York: Augustus M Kelley, 1969).Google Scholar
Lipkes, J. (1999) Politics, Religion and Classical Political Economy in Britain: J S Mill and His Followers (London: Macmillan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1833) Remarks on Bentham's Philosophy, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Vol. 10 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1836) Civilization, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Politics and Society, Vol. 18 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works, Vol. 8 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1844) Essays on Some Unsettling Questions of Political Economy, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Economics and Society (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848) Principles of Political Economy, Ashley, W. (Ed.) (London: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1909, 1987).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859) On Liberty, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Politics and Society Vol. 18 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1861) Utilitarinism, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Vol. 10 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1874) Three Essays on Religion, in: Robson, J. M. (Ed.) Collected Works: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Vol. 10 (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969).Google Scholar
Mill, J. (1878) Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind: With Notes Illustrative and Critical by Alexander Bain, Andrew Findlater, and George Grote; Edited with Additional Notes by John Stuart Mill, second edition (London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer 1978).Google Scholar
Moore, G. C. G. (1995) The Role of Cliffe Leslie in the Early Stages of the English Methodenstreit, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17 (03), pp. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. C. G. (1999) John Kells Ingram, the Comtean Movement, and the English Methodenstreit, History of Political Economy, 31 (1), pp. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, S. J. (1995) Disturbing Causes, Noxious Errors, and the Theory-Practise Distinction in the Economics of J. S. Mill and W. S. Jevons, Canadian Journal of Economics, 28 (4), pp. 1194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, S. J. and Levy, D. S. (2003) Post-Ricardian British Economics, 1830–1870, in: Samuels, W. J., Davis, J., and Biddle, J. (Eds) The Blackwell Companion to the History of Economic Thought (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 130–47.Google Scholar
Peart, S. J. and Levy, D. S. (2004) Sympathy and Its Discontents: “Greatest Happiness” versus the “General Good,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 11 (09), pp. 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, J. M. (Ed.) (1963) Collected Works ofJohn Stuart Mill (Toronto: Toronto University Press and London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1990) Adam Smith and the Stock of Moral Capital, History of Political Economy, 22 (1), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. (1970) The Philosophy of J. S. Mill (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Ryan, A. (1974) J. S. Mill (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Schwartz, P. (1968) The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill (London: Wiedenfeld & Nicolson).Google Scholar
West, E. G. (1996) Adam Smith on the Cultural Effects of Specialization: Splenetics versus Economics, History of Political Economy, 28 (1), pp. 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. (1975) John Stuart Mill's Methodology, Journal of Political Economy 83 (5), pp. 1033–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, D. (1970) Introduction to J. S. Mill, Principles of Political Economy (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
Witztum, A. (1997a) Inequality and Competitiveness, Business Strategy Review, 8 (2), pp. 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witztum, A. (1997b) Distributive Considerations in Smith's Conception of Economic Justice, Economics and Philosophy, 13, pp. 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witztum, A. (2000) Social Attitudes and Public Policy, Department of Economics Discussion Paper, DEDP 00/04 (London Guildhall University).Google Scholar
Witztum, A. (2005a) Social Circumstances and Rationality: Some Lessons from Adam Smith, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64 (4), forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witztum, A. (2005b) Property Rights and the Rights of the Property Less: A Note on Adam Smith's Jurisprudence, Economics and Philosophy, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar