No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Destutt de Tracy: A French Precursor of the Virginia School of Public Finance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2009
Extract
The relationship of the Virginia School of public finance to several important topics in the history of economic thought has attracted much recent attention. Barry Baysinger and Robert Tollison (1980), for instance, view William Ewart Gladstone's fiscal policies as an attempt to create a tax constitution to restrain a revenue-maximizing government. This position is in keeping with the evolving normative taxation principles of the Virginia School (see especially Brennan and Buchanan 1980). Charles Leathers (1986), on the other hand, argues that Gladstonian finance emphasized expenditure constraints, not constitutional tax constraints. Elias Khalil (1987) meanwhile, contrasts James Buchanan's methodological individualism with the “nonseparable” approach of Sir James Steuart (1767), which led Steuart to approve of a large degree of state intervention in the economy. While these essays either find past policies that conform to Virginia School principles or else find past economic theorists with sharply different approaches, they have not noted a striking anticipation of Buchanan's view of public debts by Antonine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy (1754–1836).
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
REFERENCES
Barro, Robert J. (1984), “Are government bonds net wealth?” Journal of Political Economy 82.Google Scholar
Barry, Baysinger and Robert, Tollison (1980). “‘Chaining Leviathan:’ the case of Gladstonian finance,” History of Political Economy 12.Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Brennan and Buchanan, James M. (1980), The Power to Tax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, E.K. (1976), “The marginal cost of public funds,” The Journal of Political Economy, pp. 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. (1976), “Comment on Barro” (1974), Journal of Political Economy 84.Google Scholar
Emile, Cailliet (1943), La Tradition Litteraire des Ideoloques, with an introduction by Gilbert, Chinard, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Cappon, Lester J. (1959), The Adams-Jefferson Letters, 2 vols., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Antoine Louis, Claude, Comte Destutt de, Tracy (1804), Elemens d'Ideologie, 2nd ed., 4 vols., Paris: Courcier.Google Scholar
Antoine Louis, Claude, Comte Destutt de, Tracy (1811), A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws. Philadelphia: William Duane.Google Scholar
Antoine Louis, Claude, Comte Destutt de, Tracy (1817), A Treatise on Political Economy, translation revised and corrected by Thomas, Jefferson, Georgetown, D.C.: Joseph Milligan; facsimile reprint in Dorsey (1973).Google Scholar
John M., Dorsey (1973), Psychology of Political Science with Special Consideration for the Political Acumen of Destutt de Tracy, Detroit: Center for Health Education.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. (1987), “Sir James Steuart vs. Professor James Buchanan: critical notes on modern public choice.” Review of Social Economy 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathers, Charles G. (1986), “Gladstonian finance and the Virginia School of public finance: comment,” History of Political Economy 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Marx (1966–72). Theories of Surplus Value, trans. Burns, E. and Ryazanova, S., 3 vols., Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Sir James, Steuart (1767), An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Economy, London: Millar, A. and Cadell, T.: ed. Andrew Skinner, Edingburg and London: Oliver and Boyd for the Scottish Economic Society, 1966.Google Scholar