Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:41:30.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONFLICT IN THE LOCKEAN STATE OF NATURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2019

Celine Bouillot
Celine Bouillot*
Affiliation:
PHARE-University Paris 1.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through his philosophical treatises, John Locke is perceived as the founder of political liberalism. However, from a different perspective, he can also be seen as a mercantilist. To show that there is no complete incompatibility between Locke’s philosophical treatises and his economic essay, I stress the central role of money. Money leads to a conflict, which is usually described as a conflict between “haves” and “have nots” (Macpherson 1962; Vaughn 1980; Caffentzis 1989). I complete this analysis showing that the introduction of money in the state of nature also leads to an uncommon conflict within the owners’ class between “landed men” and “moneyed men.” I also argue that this transition from a state of peace to a state of unrest leads to the establishment of a government whose role is to avoid the escalation of the conflict into a state of war.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 511 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Jean Dellemotte, Daniel Diatkine, and Stephen Meardon for their helpful comments. I also would like to thank the participants at the following conferences and workshops where I presented earlier versions of this paper for their helpful remarks: 16th Summer School on Economic History, Philosophy and History of Economic Thought (Ankara, Turkey, 2013); ESHET conference (Lausanne, Switzerland, 2014); and Atelier Marché monétaire et politiques monétaires (PHARE, Paris, 2015). I am also grateful to two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Appleby, Joyce Oldham. 1976. “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money.” Past and Present 71: 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffentzis, Constantine Georges. 1989. Clipped Coins, Abused Words, and Civil Government: John Locke’s Philosophy of Money. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Caffentzis, Constantine Georges. 2003. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke and Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (Annual supplement): 204–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffentzis, Constantine Georges. 2010. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money: An Apology and Synopsis.” In Parigi, Silvia, ed., George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Daniel. 2014. “John Locke’s Philosophy of Money.” In Carey, Daniel, ed., Money and Political Economy in the Enlightenment. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
Carey, Daniel. 2013. “Locke’s Species: Money and Philosophy in the 1690s.” Annals of Science 70 (3): 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, Daniel. 2011. “John Locke, Money and Credit.” In Carey, Daniel and Finlay, Christopher, eds., The Empire of Credit: The Financial Revolution in the British Atlantic World, 1688–1815. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, pp. 25–51.Google Scholar
Casson, Douglas. 2016. “John Locke, Clipped Coins, and the Unstable Currency of Public Reason.” Ethics & Politics 18 (2): 153–180.Google Scholar
Desan, Christine. 2014. “Re-theorizing Money: The Struggle over the Modern Imagination.” In Desan, Christine, ed., Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 330–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmedt, Ludovic. 2007. “Les fondements monétaires de la ‘révolution financière anglaise’: le tournant de 1696.” In Théret, Bruno, ed., La monnaie dévoilée par ses crises. Volume 1. Paris: EHESS, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar
Diatkine, Daniel. 1988. “La monnaie dans la philosophie politique de John Locke.” Economie et Sociétés, Série Oeconomia 3: 3–16.Google Scholar
Diemer, Arnaud, and Guillemin, Hervé. 2009. “La marchandisation du travail dans la société anglaise de la fin du XVIIe siècle au début du XIXe.” Cahiers d’Histoire, Revue d’Histoire Critique 110: 53–81.Google Scholar
Eltis, Walter. 1995. “John Locke, the Quantity Theory of Money and the Establishment of a Sound Currency.” In Blaug, Mark, ed., The Quantity Theory of Money: From Locke to Keynes and Friedman. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 4–26.Google Scholar
Holmes, Geoffrey. 1987. “The Clash of Interests.” In Holmes, Geoffrey, ed., British Politics in the Age of Anne. London: Hambledon Press, pp. 148–182.Google Scholar
Horsefield, John Keith. 1960. British Monetary Experiments 1650–1710. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Isenmann, Morizt. 2014. Merkantilismus. Wiederaufnahme einer Debatte. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kelly, Patrick Hyde. 1991. “General Introduction.” In Kelly, Patrick Hyde, ed., Locke on Money. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–109.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. [ 1936] 1993. The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. In The Collected Writing of John Maynard Keynes. Volume VII, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kleer, Richard. 2004. “The Ruine of Their Diana: Lowndes, Locke, and the Bankers.” History of Political Economy 36 (3): 533–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1968. The World We Have Lost. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1988. “Introduction.” In Laslett, Peter, ed., Two Treatises of Civil Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–133.Google Scholar
Leigh, Arthur. 1974. “John Locke and the Quantity Theory of Money.” History of Political Economy 6 (2): 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. [1690] 1988. Two Treatises of Civil Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1689] 1947. A Letter Concerning Toleration. In The Second Treatise of Civil Government and Letter Concerning Toleration . Ed. Gough, J.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1668] 1991. “Some of the Consequences That Are Like to Follow upon Lessening of Interest to 4 Percent.” In Kelly, Patrick Hyde, ed., Locke on Money. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 167–202.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1692] 1991. Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest, and Raising the Value of Money. In Kelly, Patrick Hyde, ed., Locke on Money. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 205–342.Google Scholar
Macpherson, Crawford Brough. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 2015. The Political Economy of Mercantilism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazel, David. [1795] 1992. Traité du government civil. Paris : Garnier Flammarion.Google Scholar
Morrison, James. 2008. “A Monetary Revolution: John Locke and the Creation of England’s Fixed Exchange Rate Regime.” Working paper presented to the International Political Economy Society (IPES) Conference, November 14–15, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1867] 1909. Capital, A Critique of Political Economy. Volume 1, The Process of Capitalist Production. Ed. Engels, Friedrich. Chicago: Charles H Kerr & Company.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1969. Theories of Surplus-Value. Part 1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. “Distributive Justice.” In Nozick, Robert, ed., Anarchy, State and Utopia. Blackwell Publishers, pp. 149–231.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Kepa. 2012. “Lowndes and Locke on the Value of Money.” History of Political Economy 44 (1): 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, Steve. 2012. “Rethinking Mercantilism: Political Economy, the British Empire, and the Atlantic World in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” The William and Mary Quarterly 69 (1): 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pincus, Steve. 2009. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Ellis Thomas. 1916. The Evolution of the Money Market (1385–1915): An Historical and Analytical Study of the Rise and Development of Finance as a Centralised, Co-ordinated Force. London: Financial News.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In Campbell, Roy Hutcheson and Skinner, Andrew, eds., The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Philip, and Wennerlind, Carl. 2014. Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and Its Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Théret, Bruno. 2008. “Les trois états de la monnaie : Approche interdisciplinaire du fait monétaire.” Revue économique 59 (4): 813–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. 1980. A Discourse on Property. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughn, Karen Iversen. 1980. John Locke, Economist and Social Scientist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, François, and Sargent, Thomas. 2002. The Big Problem of Small Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weymark, John. 1980. “Money and Locke’s Theory of Property.” History of Political Economy 12 (2): 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar