Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T19:47:12.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on the Symposium on Interest and Prices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Michael Woodford
Michael Woodford
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Columbia University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The papers prepared for this symposium cover a great deal of ground. It is a pleasure to be able to respond to them, as this provides an opportunity to try to clarify some of the aims of my book (Woodford 2003) that may have been insufficiently clear in the original work. But I shall have to restrict my attention to only a few of the most important issues raised in the various papers. I shall consider three classes of issues in particular: the methodology adopted in the book, the role of “cashless” models, and the connection between my work and the Wicksellian tradition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 187 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altig, David, Christiane, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Linde, Jesper (2005) Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities and the Business Cycle, NBER working paper no. 11034, 01.Google Scholar
Benigno, Pierpaolo and Woodford, Michael (2003) Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy: A Linear-Quadratic Approach, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 18, pp. 271–333.Google Scholar
Black, Fischer (1987) Business Cycles and Equilibrium (Cambridge: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro and Trautwein, Hans-Michael (2006) Wicksell after Woodford, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (2), pp. 171–85.Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles L. (2005) Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy, Journal of Political Economy, 113 (1), pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (1999) The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective, Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (4), pp. 1661–707.Google Scholar
Del Negro, Marco, Schorfheide, Frank, Smets, Frank, and Wouters, Raf (2004) On the Fit and Forecasting Performance of New-Keynesian Models, unpublished, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, November.Google Scholar
Giavazzi, Francesco, Goldfajn, Han, and Herrerra, Santiago (2005) Inflation Targeting, Debt, and the Brazilian Experience, 1999 to 2003 (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D. (2004) A NeoWicksellian in a New Classical World: The Methodology of Michael Woodford's? Interest and Prices, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (2), pp. 143–49.Google Scholar
Laidler, David (2006) Woodford and Wicksell on Interest and Prices: The Place of the Pure Credit Economy in the Theory of Monetary Policy, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (2), pp. 151–59.Google Scholar
Mehrling, Perry (2006) Mr.Woodford and the Challenge of Finance, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (2), pp. 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Frank, and Wouters, Raf (2003) An Estimated Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area, Journal of the European Economics Association, 1 (5), pp. 1123–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Frank, and Wouters, Raf (forthcoming) Comparing Shocks and Frictions in U.S. and Euro Area Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach, Journal of Applied Econometrics. Also available as ECB working paper no. 391 (2004).Google Scholar
Wicksell, Knut (1898) Interest and Prices, Kahn, Richard (Trans) (London: Macmillan, for the Royal Economic Society, 1936).Google Scholar
Woodford, Michael (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar