Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:12:23.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BEYOND RANDOM CAUSES: HARMONIC ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS CYCLES AT THE MOSCOW CONJUNCTURE INSTITUTE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Marco P. Vianna Franco Open the ORCID record for Marco P. Vianna Franco [Opens in a new window] ,
Leonardo Costa Ribeiro Open the ORCID record for Leonardo Costa Ribeiro [Opens in a new window]  and
Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque Open the ORCID record for Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque [Opens in a new window]
Marco P. Vianna Franco
Affiliation:
Marco P. Vianna Franco: Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research Email: [email protected].
Leonardo Costa Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Leonardo Costa Ribeiro: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque
Affiliation:
Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article proposes a historical assessment of harmonic analysis of business cycles and its ability to both decompose and build cycles, as received at the Moscow Conjuncture Institute. It traces how the Fourier transform arrived at the Institute, mediated by Henry L. Moore, in the works and actions of Albert Vainshtein, Nikolai Chetverikov, and Nikolai Kondratiev, ultimately leading to Eugen Slutsky’s well-known 1927 article “The Summation of Random Causes as the Source of Cyclic Processes.” Although the evidence does not warrant the assumption that there was an orchestrated effort at the Institute to push forward a research agenda on harmonic analysis of business cycles, it certainly unfolded as more than the summation of random events and individual incursions. Moreover, the Institute as a whole could have produced much more on this matter if it had escaped Stalinist oppression for at least a few more years.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 2022 , pp. 456 - 476
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Economics Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank Mauro Boianovsky, Paul Turner, and Justine Wood for their kind assistance with research material, as well as the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their engagement, valuable comments, and constructive suggestions on earlier versions of this article. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Roy G. D. 1950. “The Work of Eugen Slutsky.” Econometrica 18 (3): 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allisson, François. 2015. Value and Prices in Russian Economic Thought: A Journey Inside the Russian Synthesis, 1890–1920. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bachelier, Louis Jean-Baptiste A. 1900. “Théorie de la Spéculation.” Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 3 (17): 21–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 1995. “A Long Wave Goodbye: Kondrat’ev and the Conjuncture Institute, 1920–28.” Europe-Asia Studies 47 (3): 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 1998. Kondratiev and the Dynamics of Economic Development: Long Cycles and Industrial Growth in Historical Context. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2005. A History of Russian Economic Thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2006. “Chancing an Interpretation: Slutsky’s Random Cycles Revisited.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (3): 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2011. E. E. Slutsky as Economist and Mathematician: Crossing the Limits of Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergles, Arthur E. 1988. “Enhancement of Convective Heat Transfer: Newton’s Legacy Pursued.” In Layton, Edwin T. Jr. and Lienhard, John H., eds., History of Heat Transfer: Essays in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the ASME Heat Transfer Division. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William H. 1921. “Weather and Harvest Cycles.” Economic Journal 31 (124): 429–452.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William H. 1922. “Wheat Prices and Rainfall in Western Europe.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85 (3): 412–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Peter. 2000. Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. Second edition. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro, and Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2007. “Johan Åkerman vs. Ragnar Frisch on Quantitative Business Cycle Analysis.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 487–517.Google Scholar
Campbell, Robert W. 2012. A Biobibliographical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cargill, Thomas F. 1974. “Early Applications of Spectral Methods to Economic Time Series.” History of Political Economy 6 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetverikov, Nikolai Sergeevich. [1959] 2010. “The Life and Scientific Work of Slutsky.” In Sheynin, Oscar, Rauscher, Guido, and Wittich, Claus, eds., Evgeny Slutsky Collected Statistical Papers. Berlin: Oscar Sheynin, pp. 249–264.Google Scholar
Crum, William L. 1923. “Cycles of Rates on Commercial Paper.” Review of Economics and Statistics 5 (1): 17–29.Google Scholar
Davis, Harold T. 1941. The Analysis of Economic Time Series. Bloomington: Principia Press.Google Scholar
Fourier, Jean-Baptiste J. 1822. Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Freeman, Chris, and Louçã, Francisco. 2001. As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1931. “A Method of Decomposing an Empirical Series into Its Cyclical and Progressive Components.” In “Proceedings of the American Statistical Association,” supplement, Journal of the American Statistical Association 26 (173): 73–78.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar. 1933. Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics . Publikasjon n. 3. Oslo: Universitetets Økonomiske Institutt.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J. 1966. “The Typical Spectral Shape of an Economic Variable.” Econometrica 34 (1): 150–161.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J., and Engle, Robert. 1983. “Applications of Spectral Analysis in Econometrics.” In Brillinger, David R. and Krishnaiah, Paruchuri R., eds., Handbook of Statistics. Volume 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Andrew C. 1975. “Spectral Analysis in Economics.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D (The Statistician), 24 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Hatanaka, Michio. 1963. A Spectral Analysis of Business Cycle Indicators: Lead-Lag in Terms of All Time Points. Econometric Research Program, Princeton Research Memorandum n. 53.Google Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley. 1878. “Commercial Crises and Sun-Spots.” Nature 19: 33–37.Google Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley. 1884. Investigation on Currency and Finance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klein, Judy L. 1997. Statistical Visions in Time: A History of Time Series Analysis 1662–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Judy L. 1999. “The Rise of ‘Non-October’ Econometrics: Kondratiev and Slutsky at the Moscow Conjuncture Institute.” History of Political Economy 31 (1): 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliukin, Petr N. 2011. “Statisticheskii Metod v Analize Problem ‘Sotsialnoi Ekonomii’ v Rabotakh N. D. Kondrateva i E. E. Slutskogo.” Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Ekonomika, seriia 5 (3): 115–124.Google Scholar
Komlev, Sergei L. 1991. “Koniunkturnyi Institut (Sudba Nauchnoi Shkoly N. D. Kondrateva).” In Iaroshevsky, Mikhail G., ed., Repressirovannaia Nauka. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 163–180.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1922] 2004. The World Economy and Its Conjunctures During and After the War. Moscow: International Kondratiev Foundation.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. 1925. “The Conjuncture Institute at Moscow.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 39 (2): 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1926] 1935. “The Long Waves in Economic Life.” Review of Economic Statistics 17 (35): 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1926] 1998. “Long Cycles of Economic Conjuncture.” In Makasheva, Natalia, Samuels, Warren J., and Barnett, Vincent, eds., The Works of Nikolai D. Kondratiev. Volume 1. London: Pickering and Chatto, pp. 25–60.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1926] 2014. Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur. Klassiker der Ökonomie Series, Volume 9. Berlin: Heptagon.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1927] 1998. “The Moscow Institute for Economic Research and Its Work.” In Makasheva, Natalia, Samuels, Warren J., and Barnett, Vincent, eds., The Works of Nikolai D. Kondratiev. Volume 4. London: Pickering and Chatto, pp. 272–281.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1928] 1992. “La Dynamique des Prix des Produits Industriels et Agricoles.” In Louis Fontvielle, ed., de la Conjoncture, Les Grands Cycles. Paris: Economica, pp. 377–492.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. [1930–1932] 1998. “Nature of the Regularity of Economic Life and the Problem of Nomography and Idiography in the Social-Economic Sciences.” In Makasheva, Natalia, Samuels, Warren J., and Barnett, Vincent, eds., The Works of Nikolai D. Kondratiev. Volume 2. London: Pickering and Chatto, pp. 124–170.Google Scholar
Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich. 1989. Problemy Ekonomicheskoi Dinamiki. Moscow: Economica.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon S. 1929. “Random Events and Cyclical Oscillations.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 24 (167): 258–275.Google Scholar
Le Gall, Philippe. 1999. “A World Ruled by Venus: Henry L. Moore’s Transfer of Periodogram Analysis from Physics to Economics.” History of Political Economy 31 (4): 723–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louçã, Francisco. 1997. Turbulence in Economics: An Evolutionary Appraisal of Cycles and Complexity in Historical Processes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1963. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” Journal of Business 36 (4): 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit. 1987. “Towards a Second Stage of Indeterminism in Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 12 (2): 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1990. “Problems in the Paternity of Econometrics: Henry Ludwell Moore.” History of Political Economy 22 (4): 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1913. Business Cycles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1926. “Introduction: Business Cycles as Revealed by Business Annals.” In Thorp, Williard Long, ed., Business Annals. New York: NBER, pp. 15–102.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1927. Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting. Chicago: NBER.Google Scholar
Moore, Henry L. 1914. Economic Cycles: Their Law and Cause. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moore, Henry L. 1923. Generating Economic Cycles. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, T. N. 1999. “Fourier’s Heat Conduction Equation: History, Influences and Connections.” Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences—Earth and Planetary Sciences 108 (3): 117–148.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Marc. 1964. “Spectral Analysis of Seasonal Adjustment Procedures.” Econometrica 32 (3): 241–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Two volumes. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schuster, Arthur. 1872. “Sun-Spots and the Vine Crop.” Nature 5: 501.Google Scholar
Schuster, Arthur. 1898. “On the Investigation of Hidden Periodicities with Application to a Supposed 26 Day Period of Meteorological Phenomena.” Terrestrial Magnetism 3 (1): 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheynin, Oscar, Rauscher, Guido, and Wittich, Claus, eds. 2010. Evgeny Slutsky Collected Statistical Papers. Berlin: Oscar Sheynin.Google Scholar
Slutsky, Evgenii Evgenevich. 1927. “Slozhenie Sluchainykh Prichin kak Istochnik Tsiklicheskikh Protsessov.” Voprosy Koniunktury 3: 34–64.Google Scholar
Slutsky, Evgenii Evgenevich. [1927] 1937. “The Summation of Random Causes as the Source of Cyclic Processes.” Econometrica 5 (2): 105–146.Google Scholar
Slutsky, Evgenii Evgenevich. 1929. “Sur l’Extension de la Theorie de Periodogrammes aux Suites des Quantités Dependentes.” Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 189: 722–734.Google Scholar
Slutsky, Evgenii Evgenevich. 1934. “Alcune Applicazioni dei Coefficienti di Fourier all’Analizi delle Funzioni Aleatorie Coherenti Stazionarie.” Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 5 (4): 3–50.Google Scholar
Turner, Paul, and Wood, Justine. 2020. “New Perspectives on Henry Ludwell Moore’s Use of Harmonic Analysis.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 42 (4): 507–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vainshtein, Albert Lvovich. 1925. “Novaya Teoriya Ekonomicheskikh Tsiklov.” Voprosy Konyunktury 1: 163–179.Google Scholar
Vainshtein, Albert Lvovich. [1926] 2010. “Urozhainost, Meteorologicheskie i Ekonomicheskie Tsikly, Problema Prognoza (po Nekotorym Noveishim Rabotam).” In Kliukin, Petr Nikolaevich, ed., Izbrannye Trudy Kondratevskogo Koniunkturnogo Instituta. Moscow: Ekonomika, pp. 242–279.Google Scholar
Vainshtein, Albert Lvovich. 1969. Narodnyi Dokhod Rossii i SSSR: Istoriia, Metodologiia Ischisleniia, Dinamika. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edwin B. 1934. “The Periodogram of American Business Activity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 48 (3): 375–417.Google Scholar
Yule, G. Udny. 1926. “Why Do We Sometimes Get Nonsense-Correlations Between Time-Series? A Study in Sampling and the Nature of Time-Series.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 89 (1): 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar