Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:31:45.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Institutionalist's Journey into the Years of High Theory: John Maurice Clark on the Accelerator-Multiplier Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Luca Fiorito
Luca Fiorito
Affiliation:
Università di Palermo, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A few years ago, an article by Arnold Heertje and Peter Heemeijer (2002) triggered an articulate and stimulating debate among scholars on the intellectual origins of Paul Samuelson's multiplier-accelerator model (1939a, 1939b). The discussion, which involved the participation of Samuelson himself, centered on whether, and to what extent, Samuelson's 1939 seminal contributions were inspired by Roy Harrod's The Trade Cycle (1936). Heertje and Heemeijer argue that “there is little factual support for Samuelson's suggestion ascribing the model mainly to Alvin Hansen, his mentor in the days of the creation of the model” (Heertje and Heemeijer 2002, p. 207). Instead, they provide convincing evidence indicating that it was Roy Harrod who actually played the major role in developing the ideas leading to the multiplier-accelerator interaction. “Theoretically speaking,” they assert, “it was Harrod who provided the most important contribution to the model. His interesting 1936 work The Trade Cycle contained valuable ideas regarding the combination of the multiplier and accelerator” (p. 217).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 437 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, Moses (1939) An Approach to a Price Theory for a Changing Economy (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Aftalion, Albert (1909) La Réalité des surproductions générales: Essai d'une théorie des crises générales et périodiques, Revue d'Economie Politique, 2 (extrait), pp. 81–117, 201–29, 241–59.Google Scholar
Besomi, Daniele (2003) Harrod, Hansen, and Samuelson on the Multiplier-Accelerator Model: A Further Note, History of Political Economy, 35 (2), pp. 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerdike, Charles F. (1914) A Non-Monetary Cause of Fluctuations in Employment, The Economic Journal, 24 (95), pp. 357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouniatian, Mentor (1908) Wirtschaftskrisen und Ueberkapitalisation. Eine Untersuchung über dieErscheinungsformen der Ursachen der periodischen Wirtschaftskrisen (Munich: Reinhardt).Google Scholar
Carver, Thomas N. (1903) A Suggestion for a Theory of Industrial Depressions, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 17 (3), pp. 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John M. (1917) Business Acceleration and the Law of Demand: A Technical Factor in Business Cycles, Journal of Political Economy, 25 (3), pp. 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John M. (1924) Studies in the Economics of Overhead Costs (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1931a) The Costs of the World War to the American People (New Haven: Yale University Press). Reprinted with an introductory essay by Joseph Dorfman (New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1970).Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1931b) Capital Production and Consumer-Taking: A Reply, Journal of Political Economy, 39 (6), pp. 814–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John M. (1932) Capital Production and Consumer-Taking: A Further Word, Journal of Political Economy, 40 (5), pp. 691–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John M. (1934) Strategic Factors in Business Cycles (New York: NBER in cooperation with the Committee on Recent Economic Changes).Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1935a) Cumulative Effects in Aggregate Spending as Illustrated by Public Works, American Economic Review, 25 (1), pp. 14–20.Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1935b) Economics of Planning Public Works: A Study Made for the National Planning Board of the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works (Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1936) Preface to Social Economics: Essays on Economic Theory and Social Problems (New York: Farrar and Reinhart).Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1940) Notes on reworking the “acceleration principle” and taking in other elements; suggested by Rendings T. Fels' master thesis. J. M. Clark Papers, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Clark, John M. (1941) Investment in Relation to Business Activity and Employment, in W. C. Mitchell et al., Studies in Economics and Industrial Relations, University of Pennsylvania Bicentennial Conference (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Eric G. (1983) The Macro-Models of R. G. Hawtrey. Ottawa: Carleton Economics Papers, pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. (1990) The New Economics and American Economists in the 1930s Reconsidered, Atlantic Economic Journal, 18 (4), pp. 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. (1988) The Origins of the Keynesian Revolution (Aldershot: Edward Elgar and Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. (1997) Hawtrey and the Multiplier, History of Political Economy, 29 (3), pp. 549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. (2002) John Maurice Clark's Contribution to the Genesis of the Multiplier Analysis: A Response to Luca Fiorito, History of Economic Ideas, 10 (1), pp. 85–91.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph (1970) Some Documentary Notes on the Relations Among J. M. Clark N.A.L.J. Johannsen and J. M. Keynes, Introduction to the reprint of John M. Clark, The Costs of the World War to the American People (New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers).Google Scholar
Fels, Rendings T. (1940) The Acceleration Principle, Master Thesis (New York: Columbia University).Google Scholar
Fiorito, Luca (2001) John Maurice Clark's Contribution to the Genesis of the Multiplier Analysis (with some unpublished correspondence), History of Economic Ideas, 9 (2), pp. 7–37.Google Scholar
Fiorito, Luca (2004) John Maurice Clark and the Multiplier: A Note, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 22–A, pp. 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Gene H. (1952) A Survey of the Theory of Induced Investment, 1900–1940, Southern Economic Journal, 18 (4), pp. 474–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar (1931) The Interrelation Between Capital Production and Consumer Taking, Journal of Political Economy, 39 (5), pp. 646–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar (1932a) Capital Production and Consumer-Taking: A Rejoinder, Journal of Political Economy, 40 (2), pp. 253–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar (1932b) Capital Production and Consumer-Taking: A Final Word, Journal of Political Economy, 40 (5), p. 694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar (1933) Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems, in: Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel (London: Allen and Unwin), pp. 171–205.Google Scholar
Harrod, Roy F. (1936) The Trade Cycle (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hansen, Alvin H. (1938) Full Recovery or Stagnation? (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Hawtrey, Ralph (1913) Good and Bad Trade; An Inquiry into the Causes of Trade Fluctuations (London: Constable and Co, Ltd).Google Scholar
Heertje, Arnold and Heemeijer, Peter (2002) On the Origins of Samuelson's Multiplier-Accelerator Model, History of Political Economy, 34 (1), pp. 2007–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Richard F. (1931) The Relation of Home Investment to Unemployment, The Economic Journal, 41 (162), pp. 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Richard F. (1933) Public Works and Inflation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28 (181), pp. 168–73.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. (1933) The Means to Prosperity (New York: Harcourt, Brace).Google Scholar
Knox, A.D. (1952) The Acceleration Principle and the Theory of Investment: A Survey, Economica, New Series, 19 (75), pp. 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, Simon (1935) Relation between Capital Goods and Finished Products in the Business Cycle, in: Economic Essays in Honor of Wesley Clair Mitchell (New York: Columbia University Press), pp. 211–67.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz (1939) Period Analysis and Multiplier Theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 54 (1), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. (1913) Business Cycles (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Robertson, Dennis (1926) Banking Policy and the Price Level (London: P.S. King).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm (2005) Institutional Economics at Columbia University, History of Political Economy, 36 (1), pp. 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1939a) Interactions between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration, Review of Economic Statistics, 21 (2), pp. 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1939b) A Synthesis of the Principle of Acceleration and the Multiplier, Journal of Political Economy, 47 (6), pp. 786–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1943) A Fundamental Multiplier Identity, Econometrica, 11 (3/4), pp. 221–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siven, Claes-Henrich (2003) Heertje, Heemeijer, and Samuelson on the Origins of Samuelson's Multiplier-Accelerator Model, History of Political Economy, 35 (2), pp. 323–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, Jan (1938) Statistical Evidence on the Acceleration Principle, Economica, New Series, 5 (18), pp. 164–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar