Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:50:28.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADAM SMITH ON METHOD: NEWTONIANISM, HISTORY, INSTITUTIONS, AND THE “INVISIBLE HAND”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2012

STEFANO FIORI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smith was influenced by Newton’s method. Nonetheless, he introduced elements that led him far from the Newtonian perspective. The present essay analyzes how historical dimensions, contingencies, institutions, and conflicting human inclinations modify a Newtonian horizon. Finally, the paper focuses on how, in Smith’s view, institutions determine “unintended outcomes,” which are sometimes opposed to those of the market. In this sense, the “invisible hand” is not only the result of the behavior of myopic individuals trying to improve their conditions; it is also the outcome of the work of institutions that operate as structures autonomous with respect to individuals.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 411 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aron, Raymond. 1965. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Vol. I. Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, Tocqueville, the Sociologists of the Revolution of 1848. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Becker, James F. 1961. “Adam Smith’s Theory of Social Science.” Southern Economic Journal 28 1 (July): 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher J. 2006. Smith and Science. In Haakonssen, Knud, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittermann, Henry J. 1940. “Adam Smith’s Empiricism and the Law of Nature: I.” The Journal of Political Economy 48, 4 (August): 487–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1971. Adam Smith’s Science of Morals. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. With Illustration of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1994. “Newton and the Social Sciences, with Special Reference to Economics, or, the Case of the Missing Paradigm.” In Mirowski, Philip, ed., Natural Images in Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 1984. Il sistema della ricchezza. Economia politica e problema del metodo in Adam Smith. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 1989. “Adam Smith: Skeptical Newtonianism, Disenchanted Republicanism, and the Birth of Social Science.” In Dascal, Marcelo and Gruengard, Ora, eds., Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies on the Relationship between Epistemology and Political Philosophy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar
Cremaschi, Sergio. 2009. “Newtonian Physics, Experimental Moral Philosophy and the Shaping of Political Economy.” In Arena, Richard, Dow, Sheila, and Klaes, Matthias, eds., Open Economics: Economics in Relation to Other Disciplines. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 2007. Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. 1767. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Fourth edition, England, repr. by Gregg International Publishers Limited, 1969.Google Scholar
Fiori, Stefano. 2001. Ordine, mano invisibile, mercato. Una rilettura di Adam Smith. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Fiori, Stefano. 2002. “Visible and Invisible Order. The Theoretical Duality of Smith’s Political Economy.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8, 4 (Winter): 429–448.Google Scholar
Foley, Duncan K. 2003. Unholy Trinity: Labor, Capital, and Land in the New Economy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon. 1981. “Adam Smith’s Analytic-Synthetic Method and the ‘System of Natural Liberty.’” History of European Ideas 2 (2): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Niccolò. 2002. “Analysis and Synthesis in Newton’s Mathematical Work.” In Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Norriss S. 1983. “Isaac Newton’s Influence on Adam Smith’s Natural Laws in Economics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44, 3 (July): 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1748. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Beauchamp, T. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ingrao, Bruna, and Israel, Giorgio. 1990. The Invisible Hand. Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre. 1968. Newtonian Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Ralph J. 1973. The Social Philosophy of Adam Smith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, David B. 2008. “Norton’s Slippery Slope.” Philosophy of Science 75 (December): 799–816.Google Scholar
Mayr, Otto. 1986. Authority, Liberty and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Megill, A. D. 1975. “Theory and Experience in Smith.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36, 1 (Jan.–Mar.): 79–94.Google Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. 2003. “Smith and Newton: Some Methodological Issues Concerning General Economic Equilibrium Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27: 723–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. 2008. “Newton’s Real Influence on Adam Smith and its Context.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32: 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, de, Baron. 1748. The Spirit of Laws. New York: Cosimo Classics, 2011.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1956. “À propos de quelques travaux d’Adam Smith sur l’histoire et la philosophie des sciences.” Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leur applications 9 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1687. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Trans. into English in 1729. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1704. Opticks. Fourth English edition (1730). Foreword by A. Einstein, Introduction by Sir Edmund Whittaker, Preface by I. Bernard Cohen. New York: Dover Publications, 1952.Google Scholar
Norton, John D. 2008. “The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism.” Philosophy of Science 75 (December): 786–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otteson, James. 2002. “Adam Smith’s First Market: The Development of Language.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 19, 1 (January): 65–86.Google Scholar
Prigogine, Ilya, and Stengers, Isabelle. 1979. La Nouvelle Alliance. Les Métamorphoses de la Science. Paris: Gallimard. English version: Order Out of Chaos, New York: Bantam, 1984.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D., and Skinner, A. S.. 1980. “General Introduction.” In Smith, Adam, Essays on Philosophical Subjects, edited by Wightman, W. P. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Redman, Deborah A. 1993. “Adam Smith and Isaac Newton.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 40, 2 (May): 210–230.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1960. “Some Institutional Aspects of the Wealth of Nations.” Journal of Political Economy 68, 6 (December): 557–570.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruelle, David. 1991. Hasard et chaos. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J. 1977. “The Political Economy of Adam Smith.” Ethics 87, 3 (April): 189–207.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2005. “Wonder in the Face of Scientific Revolutions: Adam Smith on Newton’s ‘Proof’ of Copernicanism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (4): 697–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. 2011. “Reading Adam Smith after Darwin: On the Evolution of Propensities, Institutions, and Sentiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 77: 14–22.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1972. “Adam Smith: Philosophy and Science.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 19 (November): 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Macfie, A. L. and Raphael, D. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S., and Todd, W. B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1978a. Lectures on Jurisprudence: Report of 1762–1763. Edited by Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–394.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1978b. Lectures on Jurisprudence: Report dated 1766. Edited by Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 395–558.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1980. The History of Astronomy. In Wightman, W. P. D. and Bryce, J. C., eds., Essays on Philosophical Subjects. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 33–105.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1983a. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Edited by Bryce, J. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1983b. Considerations Concerning the First Formation of Languages. In Bryce, J. C., ed., Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 201–226.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2002. “The Methodology of the Principia.” In Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–173.Google Scholar
Thomson, Herbert F. 1965. “Adam Smith’s Philosophy of Science.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 79, 2 (May): 212–233.Google Scholar