Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:41:27.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William T. Thornton and Nineteenth Century Economic Policy: A Review Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Robert B. Ekelund Jr  and
Mark Thornton
Robert B. Ekelund Jr
Affiliation:
Auburn University and Trinity University, and Columbus State University
Mark Thornton
Affiliation:
Auburn University and Trinity University, and Columbus State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Review Essay
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 513 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baxter, R. Dudley. 1868. National Income. The United Kingdom. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Breit, William. 1967. “The Wages Fund Controversy Revisited.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 23: 509–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Stephen. 1969. The Theory of Share Tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cournot, Antoine-Augustin. 1838. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses.Centennial reprint, with an introduction by Georges Luttfalla. Paris: Rivière, 1938.Google Scholar
Cournot, Antoine-Augustin. 1877. Revue Sommaire des Doctrines Economiques. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Mark. 1997. “Mill's Affirmation of the Classical Wage Fund Doctrine.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44: 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton, Hugh. E. 1926. “William Thomas Thornton.” In Higgs, Henry, ed., Palgrave's Dictionary of Political Economy. London: Macmillan and Co., pp. 537–38.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. 1997. “W T Thornton: Savant, Idiot, or Idiot-Savant?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (Spring): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. 1998. “Reply to White.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 375–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. and Hebert, R. F.. 1990. “Cournot and His Contemporaries: Is an Obituary the Only Bad Review?” Southern Economic Journal 57 (07): 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. and Hebert, R. F.. 1997. A History of Economic Theory and Method, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. and Hebert, R. F.. 1999. Secret Origins of Microeconomics: Dupuit and the Engineers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert F. Jr. and Thommesen, S.. 1989. “Disequilibrium Theory and Thornton's Assault on the Laws of Supply and Demand.” History of Political Economy 21: 567–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert. F. Jr. and Thornton, Mark. 1991. “Geometric Analogies and Market Demand Estimation: Dupuit and the French Contribution.” History of Political Economy 23: 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, Clifford and Ekelund, R. B. Jr. 1972. “Cournot's Demand Curve: A Reassessment.” History of Political Economy 4 (Spring): 190–97.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1991. “Fleeming Jenkin Revisited.” In Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. “Introduction” to Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire. In John Stuart Mill, Collected Works, Vol. VI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Jenkin, H. C. Fleeming 1870. “The Graphic Representation of the Laws of Supply and Demand.” In SirGrant, Alexander, ed., Recess Studies. Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas, pp. 151–85.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Lipkes, Jeff. 1999. Politics, Religion, and Classical Political Economy in Britain: John Stuart Mill and His Followers. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 2 vols., edited by Whitaker, J. K.. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Ashley, W J.. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1868. “England and Ireland.” In Collected Works, Vol. VI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1869. “Thornton on Labour and its Claims.” In Collected Works, Vol. V Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1871. “Land Tenure Reform.” In Collected Works, Vol. V Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1972. Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873. In Collected Works, Vols. XIV–XVII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip 1990. “Smooth Operator: How Marshall's Demand and Supply Curves Made Neoclassicism Safe for Public Consumption, but Unfit for Science.” In Tullberg, R., ed., Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Mouchot, Claude. 1998. “A Comment on Philip Mirowski's Analysis of Utility Theory.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (09): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negishi, T. 1986. “Thornton's Criticism of Equilibrium Theory and Mill.” History of Political Economy 18: 567–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichol, A. J. 1938. “Tragedies in the Life of Cournot.” Econometrica (07): 193–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Picchio, A. 1987. “William Thomas Thornton.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: The Macmillan Press Limited.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1955. “The Nature and Role of Originality in Scientific Progress.” In Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Sutton, John. 2000. Marshall's Tendencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
TheocharisReghinos, D. Reghinos, D. 1983. Early Developments in Mathematical Economics, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1848. A Plea for Peasant Proprietors; with the Outlines of a Plan for Their Establishment in Ireland. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1969.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1864. “Strikes and Co-operation.” Westminster Review 25 (04): 349–83.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1866. “A New Theory of Supply and Demand.” Fortnightly Review 6: 420–34.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1867a. “What Determines the Price of Labour or Rate of Wages?” Fortnightly Review n.s. 1 (05 1): 551–66.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1867b. “Stray Chapters from a Forthcoming work On Labour. I. The Claims of Labour, and Its Rights.” Fortnightly Review n.s. 1 (10): 477–500.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1869. On Labour: Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Duties, Its Actual Present and Possible Future. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1870a. On Labour: Its Wrongful Claims and Rightful Duties, Its Actual Present and Possible Future. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1870b. “Anti-Utiliarianism.” Fortnightly Review n.s. 8 (09): 314–37.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1879. “The Bright Clauses of the Irish Land Act.” Fortnightly Review 25 (04): 608–26.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1999. The Economic Writings of William Thornton, edited by Mirowski, Philip and Tradewell, Steven, 5 volumes. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon, 1965. Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, edited by Jaffé, William. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
WilliamsonJeffery, G. Jeffery, G. 1985. Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar