Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:08:34.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STILLBORN YET NOT WITHOUT INFLUENCE: WHAT MILL’S POLITICAL ECONOMY OWES TO HIS PROJECT OF ETHOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2021

Christophe Salvat
Christophe Salvat*
Affiliation:
Christophe Salvat: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR7304 Centre Gilles Gaston Granger, Aix-Marseille Université.
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article questions the articulation between John Stuart Mill’s initial project of creating a new science dedicated to the means of improving individual character, a science named “ethology,” and the treatise of political economy that he published instead. My claim is that his defense of free competition as well as some of the arguments he opposes to it, and which have often puzzled his readers, actually reveal the moral agenda of his political economy and of some of his political principles, specifically his ambivalent position towards paternalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 506 - 525
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albee, Ernest. 1902. A History of English Utilitarianism. London: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence. 2000. “The Formation of Character: Mill’s ‘Ethology’ Reconsidered.” Polity 33 (1): 25–48.10.2307/3235459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2010. “John Stuart Mill on Colonies.” Political Theory 38 (1): 34–64.10.1177/0090591709348186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1985. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Fourth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. 1973. “Mill’s Forgotten Science of Ethology.” Social Theory and Practice 2 (4): 409–420.10.5840/soctheorpract19732416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. 2004. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Janice. 2010. John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. 2013. Mill and Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, Alain. 1999. Nourrir le peuple, entre État et marché, XVI siècle–XIX siècle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. 1991. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. 1988. Introduction to Positive Philosophy. Translated by Ferré, F.. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cowling, Maurice. 1963. Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Alan E. 2001. “Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill’s Critique of Paternalism.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3): 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillig, Philippe. 2015. “Durkheim a-t-il visé dans le Mill?” Revue européenne des sciences sociales 53 (2): 219–244.10.4000/ress.3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillig, Philippe, and Légé, Philippe. 2017. “De la défiance à l’éloge des coopératives par J. S. Mill: retour sur la constitution d’une pensée libérale dans la première moitié du XIXe siècle.” Cahiers d’économie Politique/Papers in Political Economy 73 (2): 197–221.10.3917/cep.073.0197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, John. 2009. Robert Owen and the Owenites in Britain and America (Routledge Revivals): The Quest for the New Moral World. London: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203092354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill: Political Economy. Volume 2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Houghton, Walter E. 1957. The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leary, David E. 1982. “The Fate and Influence of John Stuart Mill’s Proposed Science of Ethology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1): 153–162.10.2307/2709167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecouteux, Guilhem. 2016. “From Homo Economicus to Homo Psychologicus: The Paretian Foundations of Behavioural Paternalism.” Œconomia 6 (2): 175–200.Google Scholar
Légé, Philippe. 2008. “Hayek’s Readings of Mill.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, George F., and Haisley, Emily. 2008. “The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‘Light’ Paternalism.” In Caplin, Andrew and Schotter, Andrew, eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics. A Handbook. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 210–245.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328318.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, James. 1829. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. London: Baldwin and Cradock.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1836] 1967. On the Definition of Political Economy. Volume IV: Essays on Essays on Economics and Society. Part I. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 120–164.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1838] 1985. Bentham. Volume X: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 75–115.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1974. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volumes VII–VIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1844] 1967. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions on Political Economy. Volume IV: Essays on Essays on Economics and Society. Part I. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 229–340.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1848] 1965. Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. In Robson, John M., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Parts I and II. Volumes II and III. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1977. On Liberty. Volume XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society. Part I. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 213–310.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1977. Considerations on Representative Government. Volume XIX: Essays on Politics and Society. Part II. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 372–579.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1861] 1985. Utilitarianism. Volume X: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 203–259.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1865] 1979. An Examination of William Hamilton’s Philosophy and of the Principal Philosophical Questions Discussed in His Writings. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume IX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1865] 1985. Auguste Comte and Positivism. Volume X: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 262–370.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869] 1984. On Subjection of Women. Volume XXI: Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 259–340.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869] 1989. James Mill’s Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Volume XXXI: Miscellaneous Writings. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 94–256.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1874] 1981. Autobiography and Literary Essay. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume I. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1967. Essays on Economics and Society. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volumes IV–V. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1977. Essays on Politics and Society. In Robson, John M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volumes XVIII–XIX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, Robert. 2002. “La tentation comtienne de John Stuart Mill: un ‘disciple indiscipliné.’” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 7 (2): 129–156.Google Scholar
Owen, Robert. 1813. A New View of Society: or, Essays on the Principle of the Formation of the Human Character. London.Google Scholar
Persky, Joseph. 2016. The Political Economy of Progress: John Stuart Mill and Modern Radicalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190460631.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. 1988. Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. 1998. “Mill’s Political Economy: Ricardian Science and Liberal Utilitarian Art.” In Skorupski, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. 1968. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781487574505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. 1998. “Civilization and Culture as Moral Concepts.” In Skorupski, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–371.10.1017/CCOL0521419875.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691148403.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1998. “Mill in a Liberal Landscape.” In Skorupski, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 497–540.10.1017/CCOL0521419875.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvat, Christophe. 2014. “Behavioral Paternalism.” Revue de Philosophie Economique/ Review of Economic Philosophy 15 (2): 109–130.10.3917/rpec.152.0109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharff, Robert C. 1989. “Mill’s misreading of Comte on ‘Interior Observation.’” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (4): 559–572.10.1353/hph.1989.0082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Pedro L. 1972. The New Politcal Economy of J.S. Mill. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Eileen. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J. S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (4): 599–617.10.2307/2709218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Thaler, Richard H.. 2003. “Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron.” University of Chicago Law Review 70 (4): 1159–1202.10.2307/1600573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, Gordon.1971. “Robert Owen on Character Formation and Education.” Religious Education 66 (6): 450–456.10.1080/0034408710660611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vint, John. 1995. “John Stuart Mill’s Wages Fund Recantation: A Lakatosian Analysis.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 6 (4): 233–254.10.1177/02601079X9500600401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Fred. 1991. “Mill and Comte on the Method of Introspection.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 27 (2): 107–129.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, Michael V. 1994. “‘That God-Forgotten Thornton’: Exorcising Higgling after On Labour.” In Marchi, Neil De and Morgan, Mary S., eds., “Higgling: Transactors and their Markets in the History of Economics,” annual supplement, History of Political Economy . Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 149–183.Google Scholar
Zastoupil, Lynn. 1983. “Moral Government: J. S. Mill on Ireland.” Historical Journal 26 (3): 707–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar