We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Roger E. Backhouse and Mauro Boianovsky, Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 215, $99 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-107-02319-2.
Review products
Roger E. Backhouse and Mauro Boianovsky, Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 215, $99 (hardcover). ISBN 978-1-107-02319-2.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
11 May 2016
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Boumans, Marcel. 2002. “Calibration.” In Snowdon, Brian and Vane, Howard R., eds., An Encyclopedia of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 105–109.Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 2005. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles L.. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.”Journal of Political Economy113 (1): 1–45.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia. 2011. “Recent Developments in Macroeconomics: The DSGE Approach to Business Cycles in Perspective.” In Davis, John B. and Wade Hands, D., eds., The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 375–403.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia. 2012. “Not Going Away? Microfoundations in the Making of a New Consensus in Macroeconomics.” In Davis, John B. and Wade Hands, D., eds., The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 190–237.Google Scholar
Duarte, Pedro Garcia, and Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, eds. 2012. Microfoundations Reconsidered—The Relationship of Micro and Macroeconomics in Historical Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver D. 1982. “A Model of Imperfect Competition with Keynesian Features.”Quarterly Journal of Economics97 (1): 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D. 2010. “Idealizing Reduction: The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics.”Erkenntnis73 (3): 329–347.Google Scholar
King, John. 2012. The Microfoundations Delusion—Metaphor and Dogma in the History of Macroeconomics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, Finn, and Prescott, Edward. 1991. “The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business Cycles.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics93 (2): 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory. 1989. “Real Business Cycle: A New Keynesian Perspective.”Journal of Economic Perspectives3 (3): 79–90.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Romer, David, eds. 1991. New Keynesian Economics. Two volumes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2002. “How (Not) to Influence People: The Contrary Tale of John F. Muth.”HOPE34 (2): 291–320.Google Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. 1996. “Macroeconomics and Methodology.”Journal of Economic Perspectives10 (1): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Frank, and Wouters, Raf. 2003. “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.”Journal of the European Economic Association1 (5): 1123–1175.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, and Mirowski, Philip. 1994. “The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics.”Science in Context7 (2): 245–272.Google Scholar