Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:44:23.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to Caldwell and Reiss's “Hayek, Logic, and the Naturalistic Fallacy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angner, E. (2002) Book Review: Friedrich Hayek: A Biography, by Alan Ebenstein (Palgrave 2001), Economics and Philosophy, 18 (10), pp. 381–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angner, E. (2004) Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy? Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26 (09), pp. 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1990) Evolutionary Social Psychology: Prospects and Pitfalls, Motivation and Emotion, 14 (12), pp. 265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. and Reiss, J. (2006) Hayek, Logic and the Naturalistic Fallacy, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (09) pp. 359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit, Bartley, W. W. III (Ed.) (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1994) From a Biological Point of View (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. E. (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar