Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:24:24.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rejoinder on Laurent Derobert's “the Labor-Less Labor Supply Model: A Little Further”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

David A. Spencer
Affiliation:
Economics Division, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK, email: [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Derobert, L. (2005) The Labor-less Labor Supply Model: A Little Further, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 27 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derobert, L. (2001) The Genesis of the Canonical Labor Supply Model, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23 (2), pp. 197215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. I. (1894) Pain-Cost and Opportunity-Cost, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8 (2), pp. 218–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. A. (2004) From Pain Cost to Opportunity Cost: The Eclipse of the Quality of Work as a Factor in Economic Theory, History of Political Economy, 26 (2), pp. 387400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. A. (2003) The Labor-less Labor Supply Model in the Era Before Philip Wicksteed, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25 (4), pp. 505–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. (1910) The Common Sense of Political Economy (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar