Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:24:42.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PRODUCTION AND EDUCATION ACCORDING TO JAMES MILL: THE PRECIOUS MIDDLE POINT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Victor Bianchini
Victor Bianchini*
Affiliation:
PHARE, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although James Mill considered production and education to be two objectives of global welfare, he claimed that the former was not always consistent with the latter. On the one hand, production is necessary to provide humankind with the means of subsistence; on the other hand, if individuals allocate all their time to labor to the detriment of their own education, “neither intellect, virtue nor happiness can flourish upon the earth” (Mill [1819] 1825, p. 30). Mill argued that this problem might be solved by finding what he called “the precious middle point.” This point deserves special consideration: it acknowledges that there is a way in which education and production might be distributed in society in order to promote the greatest global welfare. The aim of this paper is to explain the relation between production and education through the working of the precious middle point.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 153 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bain, Alexander. 1882. James Mill: A Biography. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchini, Victor. 2015. “From the Laws of Human Nature to Capital Accumulation: The States of Society in James Mill’s Elements of Political Economy.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (5): 852–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchini, Victor. 2016. “James Mill on Intemperance and Individual Preferences.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 38 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Ball, Terrence, ed. 1992. James Mill: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1785–1786] 1828–1843. The Principles of the Civil Code. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, Bowring, John. Volume 1. Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1816] 1828–1843. Chrestomathia. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, Bowring, John. Volume 8. Edinburgh: William Tait.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1824] 1973. “On James Mill.” In Parekh, Bhikhu, ed., Bentham’s Political Thought. London: Croom Helm, pp. 311–312.Google Scholar
Burns, Jimmy H. 1976. “The Light of Reason: Philosophical History in the Two Mills.” In Robson, John and Laine, Michael, eds., James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Burston, Wyndham Henry. 1969. James Mill on Education. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Burston, Wyndham Henry. 1973. James Mill on Philosophy and Education. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Francis Alexander. 1931. James & John Stuart Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred William Bob, ed. 1971a. The Classical Economists and Economic Policy. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd,Google Scholar
Coats, Alfred William Bob. 1971b. “The Classical Economist and the Labourer.” In Coats, Alfred William Bob, ed., The Classical Economists and Economic Policy. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, pp. 144–179.Google Scholar
Corfield, Penelope. 1987. “From Rank to Class: Innovation in Georgian England.” History Today 3, no. 2 (February). http://www.historytoday.com/penelope-corfield/rank-class-innovation-georgian-england [online]. Accessed 19 January 2016.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1959. James Mill on Education. University of Auckland Bulletin 54, Education Series 1.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1961. “Useful Learning: Bentham’s Chresthomatia with Particular Reference to the Influence of James Mill on Bentham.” University of Auckland Bulletin 56, Education Series 3.Google Scholar
Fenn, Robert A. 1987. James Mill’s Political Thought. New York and London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Fenn, Robert A., ed. 2010. James Mill’s Common Place Books. Sussex: University of Sussex, 2010. http://intellectualhistory.net/mill. Accessed 31 October 2015.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. [1901–1904] 1995. La formation du radicalisme philosophique. Volumes 2 and 3. Les classiques des sciences sociale, electronic version realized by Toussaint, Réjeanne and Simonet, Jean-Marc. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. 1963. James Mill and the Art of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Laine, Michael, and Robson, John M., eds. 1976. James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lively, Jack, and Rees, John, eds. 1978. Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill’s ‘Essay on Government,’ Macaulay’s ‘Critique,’ and the Ensuing Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. [1829] 1860. “Mill on Government.” In The Miscellaneous Writings of Lord Macaulay. Volume 1. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts, pp. 282–323.Google Scholar
Milgate, Murray, and Stimson, Shannon S.. 1993. “Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform.” The American Political Science Review 87 (4): 901–911.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1803a. “Millar’s Historical Views.” The Literary Journal or Universal Review of Literature Domestic and Foreign II (October): 325–333.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1803b. “Malthus’s Essay.” The Literary Journal or Universal Review of Literature Domestic and Foreign II (December): 577–587.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1804. An Essay of the Impolicy of a Bounty on the Exportation of Grain; and on the Principles which Ought to Regulate the Commerce of Grain. London: C. and R. Baldwin.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1811a. “‘Chas. Sur la Souveraineté.’” Edinburgh Review XVII: 409–428.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1811b. “Liberty of the Press.” Edinburgh Review XVIII: 98–123.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1813. “Schools for All, in Preference to Schools for Churchmen Only.” Edinburgh Review 21 (41): 207–219.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1816a. “Bank for Savings.” In Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1816–1824). Volume 2. Edinburgh: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., pp. 91–101.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1816b. “Benefit Societies.” In Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1816–1824). Volume 2. Edinburgh: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., pp. 263–269.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1817a. “Caste.” In Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1816–1824). Volume 2. Edinburgh: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., pp. 647–656.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1817b [1826]. The History of British India. Volumes I and 5. Third edition. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1818] 1825. “Colony.” Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1819] 1825. “Education.” Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1820] 1825. “Government.” Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1821a] 1825. “Jurisprudence.” Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1821b] 1825. “Liberty of the Press.” Supplement of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1821c] 1995. Elements of Political Economy. Reprints of the 1884 edition. New York: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1825. “The Edinburgh Review on Parliamentary Reform.” Westminster Review 4: 194–233.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826a. “Summary Review of the Conduct and Measures of the Seventh Imperial Parliament.” Parliamentary History and Review: 772–802.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826b. “State of the Nation.” Westminster Review 6 (12): 249–278.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1829]. 1967. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Reprint of second edition [1869], with illustrative and critical notes by Bain, Alexander, Findlater, Andrew, Grote, George, and Mill, John Stuart. Two volumes. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1836a. “Whether Political Economy Is Useful.” London Review, 2 (4): 553–572.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1836b. “Aristocracy.” London Review II: 283–306.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 2010a. “Aristocracy.” In Fenn, Robert A., ed., James Mill’s Common Place Books. Volume 1. Sussex: University of Sussex, ch. 9.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 2010b. “Education.” In Fenn, Robert A., ed., James Mill’s Common Place Books. Volume 3. Sussex: University of Sussex, ch. 2.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1961. The Early Draft of John Stuart Mill’s Autobiography. Edited by Stillinger, Jack. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Place, Francis. [1822] 1930. Illustrations and Proofs of the Principle of Population. A new edition with introduction and critical and textual notes by Himes, Norman E.. London: Geo. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Quinn, Michael. 2008. “Mill on Poverty, Population and Poor Relief.” Revue d’études benthamiennes [Online], 4. https://etudes-benthamiennes.revues.org/185. Accessed 4 January 2016.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. [1821] 2005. “Ricardo’s Notes on Mill’s Elements of Political Economy.” In The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Volume 9, edited by Sraffa, Piero with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp. 126–133.Google Scholar
Sigot, Nathalie. 1993. “‘Be quiet’, mais modérément: Le rôle de l’Etat dans la pensée économique de Jeremy Bentham.” Revue Economique 44 (1): 23–50.Google Scholar
Sigot, Nathalie. 1995. “L’utilitarisme benthamien à la rencontre de l’économie classique.” PhD thesis, Université paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1981. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Volume II of the Glasgow edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Torrance, Thomas S. 2006. “James Mill as Economist: Theory Dominated by Deductive Method.” In Dow, Alexander and Dow, Sheila, eds., A History of Scottish Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 146–163.Google Scholar
Villers, Charles de. 1805. Essay on the Spirit and Influence of the Reformation of Luther. Translated and illustrated with copious notes by James Mill. London: Printed for C. and R. Baldwin, etc.Google Scholar
Walraevens, Benoît. 2011. “Corruption des travailleurs et éducation dans les sociétés selon Adam Smith.” Cahiers d’économie politique 1 (60): 11–44.Google Scholar
Westerman, Ingmar. 1999. “Authority and Utility: John Millar, James Mill and the Politics of History c.1770–1836.” PhD thesis, Academisch Proefschrift.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1966. James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Edinburgh: Oliver Boyd for the Scottish Economic Society.Google Scholar