Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:28:56.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE CONCEPT OF ‘FELICITAS PUBLICA’ IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY POLITICAL ECONOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

Federico D’Onofrio
Federico D’Onofrio*
Affiliation:
[email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents some observations on “public happiness” in order to clarify the idea’s meaning in the eighteenth-century Italian context. It examines Lugino Bruni’s interpretation of this concept, and criticizes his understanding of public happiness as the continuation of Artistotle’s eudaimonia. Bruni stresses the social and collective nature of happiness in the civil economy of the Italian eighteenth century. By examining the works of Ludovico Antonio Muratori and Antonio Genovesi, this article addresses instead the political meaning of public happiness for absolute monarchies, and underlines its origins in the German tradition of natural law.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 449 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arneth, Joseph C. von. 1839. Catalog der kaiserlich-königlichen Medaillen-Stämpel-Sammlung. Wien: Carl Gerold.Google Scholar
Birtsch, Günter. 1996. “Aufgeklärter Absolutismus oder Reformabsolutismus.” AUFKLÄRUNG 9: 101–109.Google Scholar
Bödeker, Hans E., “‘ … wer ächte freie Politik hören will, muss nach Göttingen gehen’: die Lehre der Politik in Göttingen um 1800.” In Bödeker, Hans E., Büttgen, Philippe, and Espagne, Michel, eds., Die Wissenschaft vom Menschen in Göttingen um 1800. Wissenschaftlich Praktiken, institutionelle Geographie, europäische Netzwerke. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen, pp. 325–369.Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino. 2006. Routledge Studies in the History of Economics, Civil Happiness. Economics and Human Flourishing in Historical Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino. 2012. “Antonio Genovesi.” In Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero, ed. Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/antonio-genovesi_%28Il_Contributo_italiano_alla_storia_del_Pensiero:_Economia%29/ (accessed 23 June 2015).Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Porta, Luigi. 2003. “Economia civile and Pubblica felicità in the Italian Enlightnment.” History of Political Economy 35 (Supplement 1): 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Sugden, Robert. 2000. “Moral Canals. Trust and Social Capital in the Work of Hume, Smith and Genovesi.” Economics and Philosophy (1): 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Zamagni, Stefano. 2007. Frontiers of Business Ethics, Civil Economy. Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Calaresu, Melissa. 2001. “Constructing an Intellectual Identity. Autobiography and Biography in Eighteenth-Century Naples.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 6 (1): 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiosi, Elvira. 1989. “‘Humanitates’ e scienze. La Reale Accademia napoletana di Ferdinando IV. Storia di un progetto.” Studi Storici 30 (2): 435–456.Google Scholar
Cumont, Georges. 1888. “Jetons d’etrennes des Gouverneurs généraux de la belgique Albert de Saxe-Teschen et Marie Christine. 1780–1793.” Revue Belge de numismatique 44: 55–108.Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, Adriano. 2009. “Fra commerce e police des grains: echi del dibattito francese nel meridione d’Italia. Il caso di Herbert.” In Alimento, Antonella, ed., Modelli d‘oltre confine: prospettive economiche e sociali negli antichi stati italiani. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Ferrone, Vincenzo. 2008. Biblioteca universale Laterza, La società giusta ed equa. repubblicanesimo e diritti dell‘uomo in Gaetano Filangieri. Roma - Bari: GLF editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2004. Sécurité, territoire, population. cours au Collège de France, 1977–1978. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Galanti, Giuseppe M. 2003. Opere di Giuseppe Maria Galanti, Scritti Sull‘Italia Moderna. Cava de’ Tirreni: Di Mauro.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1767. Delle lezioni di commercio o sia d‘economia civile da leggersi nella cattedra Interiana, Delle lezioni di commercio o sia d‘economia civile da leggersi nella cattedra Interiana. Napoli: Appresso i Fratelli Simone.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1769. Lezioni di commercio o sia d‘economia civile. Bassano: a spese Remondini.Google Scholar
Genovesi, Antonio. 1780. Della diceosina o sia della filosofia del giusto e dell ́ onesto. Venezia:presso Modesto Fenzo.Google Scholar
Guasti, Niccolò. 2006. “Antonio Genovesi’s ‘Diceosina.’ Source of the Neapolitan Enlightenment.” History of European Ideas 32: 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade. International Competition and the Nation-state in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ingrao, Charles W. 1986. “The Problem of ‘Enlightened Absolutism’ and the German States.” The Journal of Modern History 58 (Supplement): 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jossa, Bruno, Patalano, Rosario, and Zagari, Eugenio Eugenio, eds. 2007. Genovesi Economista. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici.Google Scholar
Klein, Bruno. 1988. “L‘Arco di Lorena: Habsburgische Propaganda in Florenz.” Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz 32 (1/2): 253–292.Google Scholar
Klingenstein, Grete. 1994. “Between Mercantilism and Physiocracy. Stages, Modes, and Functions of Economic Theory in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1748–1763.” In Ingrao, Charles W., ed., State and Society in Early Modern Austria. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
Lach, Donald F. 1953. “The Sinophilism of Christian Wolff (1679–1754).” The Journal of the History of Ideas 14 (4): 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landi, Sandro. 2008. “‘Pubblico’ e ‘opinione pubblica’ osservazioni su due luoghi comuni del lessico politico italiano del Settecento.” Cromohs 13: 1–11.Google Scholar
Landucci, Sergio. 2014. I filosofi e i selvaggi. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Lutterbeck, Klaus-Gert. 2002. Forschungen und Materialien zur Deutschen Aufklärung. Abteilung II, Monographien, Staat und Gesellschaft bei Christian Thomasius und Christian Wolff. Eine historische Untersuchung in systematischer Absicht. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Maier, Hans. 2009. Gesammelte Schriften, Die ältere deutsche Staats- und Verwaltungslehre. Second edition. München:Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Marcialis, Maria T. 1999. “Antonio Genovesi e la costruzione scientifica dell‘economia civile.” In Marcialis, Maria T., ed., Collana di filosofia, Ragione, natura, storia: quattro studi sul Settecento. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 103–134.Google Scholar
Marri, Fabio, and Lieber, Maria. 1997. Italien in Geschichte und Gegenwart / Italien in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Lodovico Antonio Muratori und Deutschland. Studien zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte der Frühaufklärung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marri, Fabio, eds. 2010. Italien in Geschichte und Gegenwart, La corrispondenza di Lodovico Antonio Muratori col mondo germanofono: carteggi inediti. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Matarazzo, Pasquale. 2005. “Da Spioni a Speculatori. La politicizzazione della tradizione scientifica a Lecce nel secondo Settecento.” In Di Simone, M. R., ed., Inter-esse, Prospettive sui lumi: cultura e diritto nell‘Europa del Settecento. Torino: G. Giappichelli, pp. 131–170.Google Scholar
Matarazzo, , 2006. Le province in soccorso del governo. Cultura e politica nel Regno di Napoli nel Settecento. Contursi Terme: Il Fauno Editrice.Google Scholar
Muratori, Ludovico A. 1736. La filosofia morale esposta e proposta a i giovani Milano: Giuseppe Cairoli Libraro.Google Scholar
Muratori, Ludovico A. 1749. Della pubblica felicita oggetto de‘ buoni principi. Lucca: s.n.Google Scholar
Muratori, Ludovico A. 1996. Biblioteca (Donzelli editore), Della pubblica felicità, oggetto de‘ buoni principi. Roma: Donzelli.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. 1987. “The Destruction of Trust and its Economic Consequences in the Case of Eighteenth-century Naples.” In Gambetta, Diego, ed., Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
Reinert, Sophus A. 2007. “Traduzione ed emulazione. La genealogia occulta della Storia del Commercio.” In Jossa, Bruno, Patalano, Rosario, and Zagari, Eugenio Eugenio, eds., Genovesi Economista. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, pp. 155–192.Google Scholar
Reinert, Sophus A. 2011. Translating Empire. Emulation and the Origins of Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 2009. “Enlightenment, Reform, and Monarchy in Italy.” In Paquette, Gabriel B., ed., Empires and the Making of the Modern World, 1650–2000, Enlightened Reform in Southern Europe and Its Atlantic Colonies, c. 1750–1830. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Axel. 2005. Hallesche Beiträge zur Europäischen Aufklärung, Staatslehre und Staatsbildung. Die Staatswissenschaft an der Universität Halle im 18. Jahrhundert. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabetti, Filippo. 2012. “Public Happiness as the Wealth of Nations. The Rise of Political Economy in Naples in a Comparative Perspective.” California Italian Studies 3 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salerni, Carlo. 1996. Monografie e contributi, Riflessioni sull‘economia della provincia d‘Otranto (1782): con altri documenti, illustazioni e fac-simili. Lecce: Centro di Studi Salentini.Google Scholar
Sargent, Mark A. 2005. “Utility, the Good and Civic Happiness. A Catholic Critique of Law and Economics.” Villanova University Legal Working Paper Series, 32.Google Scholar
Schiera, Pierangelo. 1968. Archivio della Fondazione italiana per la storia amministrativa (Series): Prima collana, Monografie, ricerche ausiliare, opere strumentali, Il Cameralismo e l‘assolutismo tedesco. Dall'arte di governo alla scienza dello Stato. Milano: A. Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Small, Albion W. 1909. The Cameralist: The Pioneers of German Social Polity. Chicago: Burst.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 1984. “Bronzino’s Allegory of Happiness.” The Art Bulletin 66 (3): 390–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapelbroek, Koen. 2006. “Preserving the Neapolitan State. Antonio Genovesi and Ferdinando Galiani on Commercial Society and Planning Economic Growth.” History of European Ideas 32: 406–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Franciscus. 1872. Tractatus de legibus ac deo legislatore: in decem libros distributus, Tractatus de legibus ac Deo legislatore in decem libros distributus. Neapoli: Ex Typis Fibrenianis.Google Scholar
Valera, Gabriella. 1986. “Statistik, Staatengeschichte, Geschichte im 18. Jahrhundert.” In Bödeker, Hans E., Iggers, Georg, Knudsen, Jonathan B., and Reill, Peter H., eds., Aufklärung und Geschichte. Studien zur deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, pp. 119–143.Google Scholar
van Melton, James H. 1979. “From Enlightenment to Revolution. Hertzberg, Schlözer and the Problem of Despotism in the Late Aufklärung.” Central European History 12 (2): 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völker, Angela. 1979. “Felicitas.” In Reallexicon zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte, 1152–70.Google Scholar
Wahnbaeck, Till. 2004. Luxury and Public Happiness. Political Economy in the Italian Enlightenment. Oxford Historical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wille, Dagmar von. 1991. Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, Lessico filosofico della Frühaufklärung. Christian Thomasius, Christian Wolff, Johann Georg Walch. Roma: Edizioni dell‘Ateneo.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian F. von. 1747. Vernünfftige Gedancken von dem gesellschaftlichen Leben der Menschen, und insonderheit dem gemeinen Wesen zu Beförderung der Glückseeligkeit des menschlichen Geschlechtes. Sixth edition. Frankfurt und Leipzig: n.p.Google Scholar
Zamagni, Stefano. 2007. Idee. Economia, L‘economia del bene comune. Roma: Città Nuova.Google Scholar
Zlabinger, Eleonore. 1975. “Muratori und Oesterreich.” In Convegno internazionale di studi muratoriani, La fortuna di L. A. Muratori. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, Cornel. 2005. “Consociatio.” In Ingravalle, Francesco and Malandrino, Corrado, eds., Fondazione Luigi Firpo, Centro di studi sul pensiero politico, Il Lessico della Politica di Johannes Althusius. l‘arte della simbiosi santa, giusta, vantaggiosa e felice. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki, pp. 143–168.Google Scholar