Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:36:32.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NEOLIBERAL ECONOMISTS AND THE BRITISH WELFARE STATE, 1942–1975

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

George Peden*
Affiliation:
University of Stirling.

Abstract

Liberal economists’ attitudes towards the welfare state are examined to see how clearly neoliberalism can be distinguished from other forms of liberalism. Three questions are asked. First, how could Friedrich Hayek believe he could accommodate elements of the welfare state agenda set by William Beveridge and John Maynard Keynes into his thinking? Second, why did Hayek become increasingly critical of the welfare state? Third, how far did Lionel Robbins, John Jewkes, and Alan Peacock agree with him? All three might be regarded as neoliberals according to the litmus test set by Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe: that is, membership of the Mont Pèlerin Society or a think tank associated with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. Yet, Robbins, Jewkes, and Peacock are on a spectrum between Mirowski’s definition of neoliberalism as a belief that freedom is to be found in the unfettered market, and classical and democratic liberals’ belief that people have to be nurtured to become effective citizens and have to be protected from the market’s disruptive effects. It is suggested that a nuanced approach is required in explaining why liberal economists came to believe the welfare state should make more use of markets and pricing systems for registering preferences and apportioning resources.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abel-Smith, Brian, and Townsend, Peter. 1965. The Poor and the Poorest. Number 17. London: Occasional Papers on Social Administration.Google Scholar
Alexander, Andrew, et al. 1967. Towards a Welfare Society. Occasional Paper 13. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. 1991. “A National Minimum? A History of Ambiguity in the Determination of Benefit Scales in Britain.” In Wilson, Thomas and Wilson, Dorothy, eds., The State and Social Welfare: The Objectives of Policy. London and New York: Longman, pp. 121142.Google Scholar
Barry, Norman, et al. 1984. Hayek’s “Serfdom” Revisited. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William. 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Services. British Parliamentary Papers, session 1942-43, Cmd. 6404.Google Scholar
Beveridge, William. 1944. Full Employment in a Free Society. London: Liberal Publications Department.Google Scholar
Burgin, Angus. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Croham, Lord. 1981. “The IEA as Seen from the Civil Service.” In The Emerging Consensus. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, pp. 206215.Google Scholar
Fiegehen, Guy C., Lansley, Peter S., and Smith, Anthony D.. 1977. Poverty and Progress in Britain, 1953–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1978. The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Jose. 1997. William Beveridge: A Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hartwell, Ronald Max. 1995. A History of the Mont Pèlerin Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1975. Full Employment at Any Price? Occasional Paper 45. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1978. A Tiger by the Tail: A 40-Years’ Running Commentary on Keynesianism. Compiled and introduced by Shenoy, Sudha R.. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Howson, Susan. 2011. Lionel Robbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ben. 2010. “At the Origins of Neo-liberalism: The Free Economy and the Strong State.” Historical Journal 53 (1): 129151.Google Scholar
Jackson, Ben. 2012. “The Think-Tank Archipelago: Thatcherism and Neo-liberalism.” In Jackson, Ben and Saunders, Robert, eds., Making Thatcher’s Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4361, 286–291.Google Scholar
Jewkes, John. 1948. Ordeal by Planning. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jewkes, John. 1978. “The Government and Employment Policy: A Defence of the White Paper on Employment Policy.” In Jewkes, John, A Return to Free Market Economics? Critical Essays on Government Intervention. London: Macmillan, pp. 3952.Google Scholar
Jewkes, John, and Jewkes, Sylvia. 1961. The Genesis of the British National Health Service. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jewkes, John, and Jewkes, Sylvia. 1963. Value for Money in Medicine. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1940. How to Pay for the War: A Radical Plan for the Chancellor of the Exchequer. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 1984. “Origins and Impact of the Welfare State, 1883–1983.” Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 148 (March): 5587.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. [1890] 1907. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas H. [1965] 1985. Social Policy. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Middleton, Roger. 1996. “The Size and Scope of the Public Sector.” In Green, Simon and Whiting, Richard, eds., The Boundaries of the State in Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89145.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Parker.Google Scholar
Ministry of Reconstruction. 1944. Employment Policy. British Parliamentary Papers, session 1943-44, Cmd. 6527.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2014. “The Political Movement That Dared Not Speak Its Own Name: The Neoliberal Thought Collective Under Erasure.” Working Paper 23. Oxford: Institute for New Economic Thinking.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, and Plehwe, Dieter, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neo-liberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moggridge, Donald, ed. 1980. Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume 27. London and New York: Macmillan and Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Moggridge, Donald. 1992. Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan. 1957a. “Welfare in the Liberal State.” in Watson, G., ed., The Unservile State: Essays in Liberty and Welfare. London: George Allan & Unwin, pp. 113130.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan. 1957b. “From Political Economy to Economic Science.” University of Edinburgh Journal 18 (Summer): 249257.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan. 1958. “The Future of Liberalism in Britain.” Lecture at the University of Virginia, 6 November 1958, St Andrews University Archives, collection number ms38965.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan. 1962. The Welfare Society. Unservile State Papers 2. London: Liberal Publication Department.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan. 2010. Anxious to Do Good: Learning to Be an Economist the Hard Way. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan, and Peden, George. 2014. “Merging National Insurance Contributions and Income Tax: Lessons of History.” Economic Affairs 34 (1): 213.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan, and Shaw, Graham Keith. [1971] 1976. The Economic Theory of Fiscal Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan, and Wiseman, Jack. 1964. Education for Democrats: A Study of the Financing of Education in a Free Society. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Peden, George. 2015. “Alan Turner Peacock 1922–2014.” Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy 14: 495516.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1947. The Economic Problem in Peace and War. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1954. The Economist in the Twentieth Century and Other Lectures in Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1961. “Hayek on Liberty.” Economica, new series, 28 (109): 6681.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1963a. Higher Education: Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins. British Parliamentary Papers, session 1962-63, Cmnd. 2154.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1963b. “Monetary Theory and the Radcliffe Report.” In Robbins, Lionel, Politics and Economics: Papers in Political Economy. London: Macmillan, pp. 197226.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1971. Autobiography of an Economist. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sloman, Peter. 2015. The Liberal Party and the Economy, 1929–1964. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, Florence. 2012. “Neo-liberalism and Morality in the Making of Thatcherite Social Policy.” Historical Journal 55 (2): 497520.Google Scholar
Thane, Pat. 1996. Foundations of the Welfare State. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. [1958] 1976. Essays on the ‘Welfare State.’ London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Townsend, Peter. 1957. The Family Life of Old People: An Inquiry in East London. Report Number 2. London: Institute of Community Studies.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 2009. “Liberalism and Neoliberalism in Britain, 1930–1980.” In Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter, eds., The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neo-liberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 6897.Google Scholar
Turner, Rachel. 2008. Neo-liberal Ideology: History, Concept and Policies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar