Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:37:02.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lost Causes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Kevin D. Hoover
Kevin D. Hoover
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616–8578.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Often papers begin with an idea. Once the paper is written, sometimes little sometimes much effort goes into finding a title. This lecture worked the other way round. It started with the title, which I passed on to Roy Weintraub, my successor as President of the Society, when I still had but the vaguest idea ol what I would write. When Roy heardmy title he pointed me to a passage from C. Vann Woodward, that he hadhimself quotedin Stablizing Dynamics:

Lost causes, especially those that foster loyalties and nostalgic memories are among the most prolific breeders of historiography. If survivors deem the cause not wholly lost andperhaps in some measure retrievable, the search of the past becomes more frantic and the books about it more numerous. Blame must be fixed, villains found, heroes celebrated, old quarrels settled, old dreams restored, and motives vindicated. Amid the ruins controversy thrives and books proliferate (quoted by Weintraub 1991, p. 125, from Vann Woodward 1986).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 149 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basmann, R. L. 1965. “A Note on the Statistical Testability of ‘Explicit Causal Chains’ Against the Class of ‘Interdependent’ Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60 (312): 1080–93.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 2003. “The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (2): 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, M. 1995. “A Peculiarly English Provocateur.” Wall Street Journal 10 30, 1995, p. A16.Google Scholar
Brennen, M. J. 1965. Preface to Econometrics. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, M. & Fox, K. A. 1959. Methods of Correlation and Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. 1933. Editor's Note. Econometrica 1 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1949. “The Marshallian Demand Curve.” Journal of Political Economy 57 (6): 463–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. “Comment on Tobin.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (2): 318–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. & Schwartz, A. J. 1963a. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. & Schwartz, A. J. 1963b. Money and Business Cycles. Review of Economics and Statistics 45 (supplement). Reprinted in Milton Friedman, The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago, IL: Aldine, pp. 189–236.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. 1964. Econometric Theory. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37 (3): 424–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavelmo, T. 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica 12 (Supplement): iii–vi + 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. D. 1996. Theory and Measurement: Causality Issues in Milton Friedman's Monetary Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J. 2000. “Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis in Economics: A Twentieth Century Retrospective.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 45–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D. F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, D. F. & Morgan, M. S. 1995. The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1742. Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, edited by Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1985.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1777. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In Selby-Bigge, L. A., ed., Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, second edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. 1963. Econometric Methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Kane, E. J. 1968. Economic Statistics and Econometrics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Klein, L. R. 1953. A Textbook of Econometrics. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.Google Scholar
Klein, L. R. 1962. An Introduction to Econometrics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T. 1950. Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models. Cowles Commission Monograph 10. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T. & Hood, W. eds. 1953. Studies in Econometric Method. Cowles Commission Monograph 14. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, O. 1962. Introduction to Econometrics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1988. Pasteurization of France, translated by Sheridan, Alan and Law, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leser, C. E. V. 1966. Econometric Techniques and Problems. New York, NY: Hafner Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr. 1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” In Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, Allan H., eds. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 11, Spring. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 161–68.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1885. “The Present Position of Economics.” In Pigou, A. C., ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan, 1925, pp. 152–74.Google Scholar
Mayer, T. 1993. “Friedman's Methodology of Positive Economics: A Soft Reading.” Economic Inquiry 31 (2): 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. 1991. “The Stamping Out of Process Analysis in Econometrics.” In De Marchi, Neil and Blaug, Mark, eds., Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 237–65.Google Scholar
Orcutt, G. H. 1952. “Actions, Consequences, and Causal Relations.” Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (4): 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1918. On the Notion of Cause. In Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic, London: Allan and Unwin, pp. 180–208.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1952. “On the Definition of the Causal Relation.” Reprinted in Herbert A. Simon, Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1953. “Causal Ordering and Identifiability.” Reprinted in Herbert A. Simon, Models of Man. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1955. “Causality and Econometrics: Comment.” Econometrica 23 (2): 193–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. 1972. “Money, Income, and Causality.” American Economic Review 62 (4): 540–52.Google Scholar
Stone, L. Undated. “The Future of History”, unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Theil, H. 1971. Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1951. Econometrics. New York: The Blakiston Company.Google Scholar
Tintner, G. 1952. Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. 1970. “Money and Income: Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (2): 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valavanis, S. 1959. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Walters, A. A. 1970. An Introduction to Econometrics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 2001. “Re: HES: QUERY—History of Political Economy Readers.” E-mail message on the History of Economics Society listserve, 08 16, 2001.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wold, H. O. A. 1955. “Causality and Econometrics: Reply.” Econometrica 23 (2): 196–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, C. V. 1986. “The Lost Cause.” New York Review of Books, Vol. 33, 01 30, 1986, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar