Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:29:16.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JULES DUPUIT AND THE RAILROADS: WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE STATE?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Philippe Poinsot
Philippe Poinsot*
Affiliation:
PHARE, University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emergence of railroads in France in the nineteenth century raised new debates on analytical issues. The issue lies in the fact that they are natural monopolies. In this paper, I focus on Jules Dupuit’s work on the operations of the railroads. Curiously, he seemed to have defended two contrasting positions: on the one hand, he claimed that unlimited competition is the most efficient way to operate in the railroads; on the other, he stated that State management was the best way to run them. I aim to restore the consistency of Dupuit’s positions. I show that, for him, unlimited competition is not possible in the railroads and that it is not necessarily good for the welfare of society. Therefore, the State should regulate this sector. Then, I specify the conditions under which Dupuit believed the State should manage the railroads instead of offering concessions to private companies.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 189 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allais, Maurice. 1989. La théorie générale des surplus. Second edition. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Béraud, Alain. 2005a. “Le marché, les services publics et les monopoles.” Actes du 4ème Colloque de l’Association internationale Walras, Les Cahiers du CERAS (4): 25–51. Available at: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/03/72/35/PDF/Le_marche_les_services_publics_et_les_monopoles.pdf: 1–28. Accessed 15 May 2010.Google Scholar
Béraud, Alain. 2005b. “Richesse et Valeur: La contribution des économistes français du début du 19éme siècle.” Economies et Sociétés, Cahiers de l’ISMEA PE (36): 1009–1032.Google Scholar
Blaise, Adolphe. 1862. “Correspondance—Les chemins de fer et l’Etat—Lettre au Rédacteur en chef.” Journal des Économistes 33 (28): 280–282.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves, and Klotz, Gérard, eds. 2009. Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Cantos, Pedro, Manuel Pastor, José, and Serrano, Lorenzo. 2010. “Vertical and Horizontal Separation in the European Railway Sector and its Effects on Productivity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 44 (2): 139–160.Google Scholar
Cantos, Pedro, Manuel Pastor, José, and Serrano, Lorenzo. 2012. “Evaluating European Railway Deregulation Using Different Approaches.” Transport Policy 24: 67–72.Google Scholar
Caron, François. 1997. Histoire des chemins de fer en France. I: 1740–1833. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Colson, Clément. 1908. Transports & Tarifs. Third edition. Paris: Lucien Laveur.Google Scholar
Daniel, Norman E. 1971. “The Impact of Ellet, Dupuit, and Lardner on the Development of Economic Concepts.” Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business 10 (2): 35–54.Google Scholar
Diemer, Arnaud. 2000. “Jules Dupuit et la discrimination par les prix.” In Dockès, Pierre, Frobert, Ludovic, Klotz, Gérard, Potier, Jean-Pierre, and Tiran, André, eds., Les traditions économiques françaises: 1848–1939. Paris: CNRS Editions, pp. 337–349.Google Scholar
Diemer, Arnaud. 2003. “Utilité, valeur, demande, la controverse entre Jean-Baptiste Say et Jules Dupuit.” In Potier, Jean-Pierre and Tiran, André, eds., Jean-Baptiste Say: Nouveaux regards sur son œuvre. Paris: Economica, pp. 361–380.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1844] 1952. “De la mesure de l’utilité des travaux publics.” [On the measurement of the utility of public works.] English translation by Barback, R. H.. International Economic Papers 2: 83–110.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1849] 1962. “De l’influence des péages sur l’utilité des voies de communication.” [On tolls and transport charges.] English translation by Henderson, E.. International Economic Papers 11: 7–31.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1852] 2009. “Eau.” In Dictionnaire de l’Économie Politique. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 535–559.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1853a] 2009. “Voies de communication.” In Dictionnaire de l’Économie Politique. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 431–452.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1853b] 2009. “Péage.” In Dictionnaire de l’Économie Politique. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 517–529.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1853c] 2009. “Du monopole des chemins de fer.” Journal des Économistes, intervention at Société d’Économie Politique meeting of March 10, 1853. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 573–575.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1853d] 2009. “Routes et chemins.” In Dictionnaire de l’Économie Politique. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 453–466.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1861a] 2009. “Voies de communication.” In Dictionnaire universel théorique et pratique du commerce et de la navigation. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 467–476.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1861b] 2009. “Du principe de propriété. Le juste—L’utile (suite et fin).” Journal des Économistes. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume II. Paris: Economica, pp. 613–640.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1861c] 2009. “Du principe de propriété. Le juste—L’utile.” Journal des Économistes. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume II. Paris: Economica, pp. 583–612.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1862a] 2009. “Les compagnies son-elles plus aptes que l’Etat à exercer une industrie, surtout lorsque cette industrie est un monopole? S’il y a possibilité de concilier les grandes compagnies avec la concurrence.” Journal des Économistes, intervention at Société d’Économie Politique meeting of December 5, 1861. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 583–589.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1862b] 2009. “[Monsieur le Rédacteur, Mon honorable collègue, M. Blaise (des Vosges)].” Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 591–597.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1863a] 2009. “Chemin de fer.” In Block, M., ed., Dictionnaire général de la politique. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 477–489.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1863b] 2009. “Questions d’économie politique et de droit public par M. G. de Molinari.” Journal des Économistes. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume II. Paris: Economica, pp. 125–132.Google Scholar
Dupuit, Jules. [1865] 2009. “Suppression des droits de navigation sur les canaux et amélioration des voies navigables.” Journal des Économistes, intervention at Société d’Économie Politique meeting of February 6, 1865. Reproduced in Breton, Yves and Klotz, Gérard, eds., Jules Dupuit—Œuvres Economiques Complètes. Volume I. Paris: Economica, pp. 531–534.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. 1970. “Price Discrimination and Product Differentiation in Economic Theory: An Early Analysis.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (2): 268–278.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. 2008. “Dupuit, Arsene-Jules-Emile Juvenal (1804–1866).”In Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second edition. Basingstoke: Nature Publishing Group, pp. 561–563.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Gramm, William P.. 1970. “Early French Contributions to Marshallian Demand Theory.” Southern Economic Journal 36 (3): 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Hébert, Robert F.. 1999. Secret Origins of Modern Microeconomics. Dupuit and the Engineers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Hébert, Robert F.. 2002. “The Origins of Neoclassical Microeconomics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3): 197–215.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Hébert, Robert F.. 2003. “Ethics, Engineering, and Natural Monopoly: The ‘Modern Debate’ between Léon Walras and Jules Dupuit.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Hébert, Robert F.. 2012. “Dupuit and the Railroads.” History of Political Economy 44 (1): 97–111.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B., and Shieh, Yeung-Nan. 1986. “Dupuit, Spatial Economics and Optimal Resource Allocation: A French Tradition.” Economica New Series 53 (212): 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etner, François. 1987. Histoire du calcul économique en France. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1991. “Directive 91/440.” Official Journal 24th August 1991, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31991L0440&from=FR. Accessed 7 January 2016.Google Scholar
Friebel, Guido, Guriev, Sergei, Pittman, Russell, Shevyakhova, Elizaveta, and Tomova, Anna. 2007. “Railroad Restructuring in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe: One Solution for All Problems?” Transport Reviews 27 (3): 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friebel, Guido, Ivaldi, Marc, and Vibes, Catherine. 2010. “Railway (De)Regulation: A European Efficiency Comparison.” Economica 77 (305): 77–91.Google Scholar
Grall, Bernard. 2004. Economie des forces et production d’utilité. La pensée gestionnaire des ingénieurs des ponts (1831–1891). Rennes: Presses Universitaire de Rennes.Google Scholar
Growitsch, Christian, and Wetzel, Heike. 2009. “Testing for Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 43 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Houghton, Roy 1958. “A Note on the Early History of Consumer’s Surplus.” Economica New Series 25 (97): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Anne, and Stelling, Petra. 2007. “Economic Impacts of Swedish Railway Deregulation: A Longitudinal Study.” Transportation Research Part E 43 (5): 516–534.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre. 1976. “La conquête de l’espace national.” In Braudel, Fernand, ed., Histoire économique et sociale de la France. First edition, Book 3, Volume I. Paris: PUF, pp. 241–273.Google Scholar
Levasseur, Emile. 1912. Histoire du commerce de la France. Paris: Arthur Rousseau.Google Scholar
Mizutani, Fumitoshi, and Uranishi, Shuji. 2013. “Does Vertical Separation Reduce Cost? An Empirical Analysis of the Rail Industry in European and East Asian OECD Countries.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 43 (1): 31–59.Google Scholar
Mosca, Manuela. 1998. “Jules Dupuit, the French ‘ingénieurs économistes’ and the Société d’Economie Politique.” In Faccarello, Gilbert, ed., Studies in the History of French Political Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 254–283.Google Scholar
Mosca, Manuela. 2008. “On the Origins of the Concept of Natural Monopoly: Economies of Scale and Competition.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 15 (2): 317–353.Google Scholar
Numa, Guy. 2009a. “Théorie de l’agence et concessions de chemins de fer français au 19ème siècle.” Revue d’économie industrielle (125): 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numa, Guy. 2009b. “Réglementations et concurrence dans les chemins de fer français (1823–1914).” PhD diss., University of Paris-Dauphine.Google Scholar
Numa, Guy. 2012. “Dupuit and Walras on the Natural Monopoly in Transport Industries: What They Really Wrote and Meant.” History of Political Economy 44 (1): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numa, Guy. 2013. “On the Origins of Vertical Unbundling: The Case of the French Transportation Industry in the Nineteenth Century.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (3): 426–438.Google Scholar
Pfouts, Ralph W. 1953. “A Critique of Some Recent Contributions to the Theory of Consumers’ Surplus.” Southern Economic Journal 19 (3): 315–333.Google Scholar
Picard, Alfred. 1887. Traité des chemins de fer. I. Paris: Rothschild Editeur.Google Scholar
Pittman, Russell. 2005. “Structural Separation to Create Competition? The Case of Freight Railways.” Review of Network Economics 4 (3): 181–196.Google Scholar
Poinsot, Philippe. 2010. “The Foundations of Justice in Jules Dupuit’s Thought.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (4): 793–812.Google Scholar
Poinsot, Philippe. 2011. “La relecture de l’œuvre de Jules Dupuit à l’aune de la notion de bien-être: intérêt général, bien-être et utilité publique.” PhD diss., University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Ribeill, Georges. 1997. “Le principe du ‘libre parcours’ sur les premiers chemins de fer concédés français. Fondements théoriques et obstacles pratiques.” Revue d’histoire des chemins de fer 16–17: 29–46.Google Scholar
Siroën, Jean-Marc. 1995. “Dupuit et la pensée économique contemporaine.” Revue française d’économie 10 (2): 35–54.Google Scholar
Smith, Cecil O. 1990. “The Longest Run: Public Engineers and Planning in France.” The American Historical Review 95 (3): 657–692.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1950. “The Development of Utility Theory. I.” The Journal of Political Economy 58 (4): 307–327.Google Scholar
van de Velde, Didier, Nash, Chris, Smith, Andrew, Mizutani, Fumitoshi, Uranishi, Shuji, Lijesen, Mark, and Zschoche, Frank. 2012. “EVES-Rail—Economic Effects of Vertical Separation in the Railway Sector.” Full technical report for CER—Community of European Railways and Infrastructure Companies; by inno-V (Amsterdam) in cooperation with University of Leeds—ITS, Kobe University, VU Amsterdam University and cavity management consultants.Google Scholar
Wetzel, Heinke. 2008. “European Railway Deregulation: The Influence of Regulatory and Environmental Conditions on Efficiency.” Working Paper Series in Economics no. 86, University of Lüneburg.Google Scholar