Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:37:20.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Dewey as User and Critic of Thorstein Veblen's Ideas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Rick Tilman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Dewey (1859-1952) is easily the most influential philosopher America has produced and Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) is arguably the most influential American heterodox economist. Although scholars have often pondered both their intellectual and personal relationship, until recently no firm conclusions could accurately be drawn. Due to the lack of correspondence between the two men and the brevity of Veblen's comments on and citations of Dewey, it is difficult to know what the former thought of the latter both in terms of personality and economic ideas. But, fortunately, Dewey cited Veblen and commented on his economic thought on many occasions so it is possible to at least partly reconstruct one-half of the relationship. This reconstruction will be the focus of this article, emphasizing: (1) their biographical intersections and convergences; (2) Dewey's ideas about economics and the economy; (3) Dewey's explicit use of Veblen's economic ideas in his own published work; and (4) Dewey's critical comments in his correspondence regarding Veblen's interpretation of pragmatism and his development as a social theorist.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayres, Clarence. 1944. The Theory of Economic Progress, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Ayres Papers, Clarence E., Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Boydston, Jo Ann. 1982. John Dewey's Personal and Professional Library: A Checklist, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1935. Liberalism and Social Action, G. P. Putman's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1939. Intelligence in the Modern World, edited by Joseph, Ratner, Modern Library, New York.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1969. Education Today, Greenwood Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1976. The Middle Works, 1899–1924, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1981. The Later Works, 1925–1953, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
John Dewey Papers, Center for Dewey Studies and Morris Library, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Dewey, John and Tufts, J. H.. 1908. Ethics, Henry Holt Company, New York, revised ed., 1932.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1934. Thorstein Veblen and His America, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
Joseph Dorfman Collection, Rare Book and Manuscript Room, Butler Library, Columbia University, New York City.Google Scholar
Featherstone, Joseph. 1979. “John Dewey and David Riesman: From the Lost Individual to the Lonely Crowd,” in Herbert, Granset al., eds., On the Making of Americans: Essay in Honor of David Riesman, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gambs, John. 1946. Beyond Supply and Demand, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gruchy, Allen. 1972. Contemporary Economic Thought: The Contribution of Neo-Institutional Economics, Prentice Hall, Clifton.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1966. Sociology and Pragmatism, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. Wesley. 1950. The Backward Art of Spending Money, Augustus M. Kelly, New York.Google Scholar
Peterson, Janice and Doug, Brown, eds. 1994. The Economic Status of Women under Capitalism, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Tilman, Rick. 1985. “The Utopian Vision of Edward Bellamy and Thorstein Veblen,” Journal of Economic Issues, 18, December, 879–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, Rick. 1996. The Intellectual Legacy of Thorstein Veblen: Unresolved Issues, Westport, Greenwood Press, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Tilman, Rick and Jeff, Waddoups. 1992. “Thorstein Veblen and the Feminism of Institutional Economists,” International Review of Sociology, 3, 182–204.Google Scholar
Tool, Laurence A. 1980. “A War for Reforms” Dewey Veblen, Croly, and the Crisis of American Emergence, Ph. D. Dissertation, Rutgers.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. Theory of Leisure Class, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1904. The Theory of Business Enterprise; reprint, Augustus M. Kelly, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1906. “The Place of Science in Modern Civilization,” American Journal of Sociology, 11, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1925. “Economics in the Calculable Future,” American Economic Review, March.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1930. “The Socialist Economics of Karl Marx and His Followers” in The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1930. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1965. The Higher Learning in America, Augustus M. Kelly, New York.Google Scholar
Williams, Lloyd P. 1970. “A Liberal's Perspective on the Dismal Science: John Dewey's View of Economic Theory and Practice,” Educational Theory, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar