Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:06:12.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(IN)-STABILITY IN KALECKI’S EARLY MACROECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

Michaël Assous ,
Amitava Dutt ,
Paul Fourchard  and
Antonin Pottier
Michaël Assous
Affiliation:
Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, PHARE
Amitava Dutt
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame and FLACSO-Ecuador;
Paul Fourchard
Affiliation:
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PHARE;
Antonin Pottier
Affiliation:
MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University et l’orthographe de Poincaré.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is now almost eighty years since Michal Kalecki published his formal mathematical model of the business cycle. In this paper, we want to examine the vision embedded in that early model and the writings he published at around the same time. Sections II and III center on Kalecki’s approach to local and global (in)-stability, and section IV suggests a simplified model designed to pinpoint key aspects of Kalecki’s thinking related to the issue of endogenous cycles, ‘class struggle,’ and growth.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 39 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue: Business Cycles and Economic Growth , March 2017 , pp. 69 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Assous, Michaël. 2003. “Kalecki’s Contribution to the Emergence of Endogenous Business Cycle Theory: An Interpretation of his 1939 Essays.” History of Economic Ideas XI (1): 109–124.Google Scholar
Assous, Michaël. 2007. “Kalecki’s 1934 Model vs. the IS-LM Model of Hicks (1937) and of Modigliani (1944).” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (1): 97–118.Google Scholar
Assous, Michaël. 2014. “Michal Kalecki: An Intellectual Biography. Volume I, Rendez-vous in Cambridge 1899–1939 by Jan Toporowski.” Journal of Economic Literature 52 (2): 538–540.Google Scholar
Besomi, Daniele. 2006. “Formal Modelling vs. Insight in Kalecki’s Theory of the Business Cycle.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: A Research Annual 24: 1–48.Google Scholar
Chang, Winston W., and Smyth, David J.. 1971. “The Existence and Persistence of Cycles in a Non-Linear Model: Kaldor’s 1940 Model Re-examined.” The Review of Economic Studies 38 (1): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapple, Simon. 1995. “The Kaleckian Origins of the Keynesian Model.” Oxford Economic Papers 47 (3): 525–537.Google Scholar
Dutt, Amitava, and Amadeo, Edward. 1990. Keynes’s Third Alternative: The Neo-Ricardian Keynesians and the Post Keynesians. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frisch, Ragnar, and Holme, Harald. 1935. “The Characteristic Solutions of a Mixed Difference and Differential Equation Occurring in Economic Dynamics.” Econometrica 3: 225–239.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1940. “A Model of the Trade Cycle.” The Economic Journal 50 (197): 78–92.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1932] 1990. “Is a ‘Capitalist Overcoming of the Crisis’ Possible?” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1933a] 1990. “Essay on Business Cycle Theory.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 65–108.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1933b] 1990. “‘Critical Remarks on One of the Mathematical Theories of the Business Cycle’ by Aleksander Rajchman: A Rejoinder.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 109–119.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1933c] 1996. “The Present Phase of the World Crisis.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 6. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 183–187.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1934] 1990. “Three Systems.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 201–219.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1939] 1990. Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. London: Allen & Unwin. Reprinted in Jerzy Osiatynski, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 233–318.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1944] 1990. “Prof. Pigou on ‘The Classical Stationary State’, a Comment.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 432–433.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1967] 1991. “The Problem of Effective Demand with Tugan-Baranovsky and Rosa Luxemburg.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 451–458.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. [1968] 1991. “Trend and the Business Cycle.” In Osiatynski, Jerzy, ed., Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 435–450.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. 1990. Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 1, Capitalism, Business Cycles and Full Employment. Edited by Osiatynski, Jerzy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. 1991. Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 2, Capitalism: Economic Dynamics. Edited by Osiatynski, Jerzy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kalecki, Michal. 1996. Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Volume 6, Studies in Applied Economics, 1927–41. Edited by Osiatynski, Jerzy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kriesler, Peter. 1987. Kalecki’s Microanalysis: The Development of Kalecki’s Analysis of Pricing and Distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rugitsky, Fernando M. 2013. “Degree of Monopoly and Class Struggle: Political Aspects of Kalecki’s Pricing and Distribution Theory.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1 (4): 447–464.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1949. “Science and Ideology.” American Economic Review 39 (2): 345–359.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steindl, Josef. [1981] 1990. “Some Comments on the Three Versions of Kalecki’s Theory of the Trade Cycle.” In Los, J., ed., Studies in Economic Theory and Practice. Essays in Honour of Edward Lipinski. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reprinted in Josef Steindl, Economic Papers, 1941–88. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 139–148.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2011. “The Crises of Democratic Capitalism.” New Left Review 71: 5–29.Google Scholar
Toporowski, Jan. 2013. Michal Kalecki: An Intellectual Biography. Volume 1, Rendezvous in Cambridge 1899–1939. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Vela. 2004. “Hicksian Visions and Vignettes on (Non-Linear) Trade Cycle Theories.” Working Paper No. 0082. Department of Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway.Google Scholar