Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:45:12.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HARRY HELSON’S ADAPTATION-LEVEL THEORY, HAPPINESS TREADMILLS, AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

José Edwards
José Edwards*
Affiliation:
Escuela de Gobierno, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Psychologist Harry Helson (1898–1977) developed Adaptation-Level (AL) theory during the 1930s to the 1970s, while economics was being refined through ordinalism and expected utility theory. This essay accounts for the process of transmission of AL theory from psychophysics to behavioral psychology and eventually economics. It explains how the concept of adaptation reflectance, originally intended to explain color vision, developed into an experimental approach that caught the attention of both psychologists and economists working on welfare analysis and behavioral research. It also argues that the history of AL theory—so far, absent from narratives about economics and psychology—is worth exploring in order to gain a better understanding of the relationship between the two disciplines.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angner, Erich, and Loewenstein, George. 2012. “Behavioral Economics.” In Maki, Uskali, ed., Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 641–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appley, Mortimer H. 1971a. “Introduction: Section I.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Appley, Mortimer H., ed. 1971b. Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Lloyd L. 1971. “Introduction: Section II.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
Berlyne, Daniel E. 1960. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bevan, William. 1958. “Perception: Evolution of a Concept.” Psychological Review 65 (1): 34–55.Google Scholar
Bevan, William. 1979. “Harry Helson: 1898–1977.” The American Journal of Psychology 92 (1): 153–160.Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Cook, Thomas D.. 1997. “Donald T. Campbell (1916–1996): Obituary.” American Psychologist 52 (3): 267–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickman, Philip, and Campbell, Donald T.. 1971. “Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
Brickman, Philip, Coates, Dan, and Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie. 1978. “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (8): 917–927.Google Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Sugden, Robert. 2007. “The Road Not Taken: How Psychology Was Removed from Economics, and How It Might Be Brought Back.” The Economic Journal 117: 146–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin, Babcock, Linda, Loewenstein, George, and Thaler, Richard. 1997. “Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 407–441.Google Scholar
Clark, Andrew, Frijters, Paul, and Shields, Michael. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95–144.Google Scholar
Corso, John F. 1971. “Adaptation-Level Theory and Psychophysical Scaling.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
Dolan, Paul, and Kahneman, Daniel. 2008. “Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health.” The Economic Journal 118 (525): 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duesenberry, James. 1949. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard. [1974] 2002. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” In Easterlin, Richard, ed., Happiness in Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 5–41.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard. 2001. “Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory.” The Economic Journal 111 (473): 465–484.Google Scholar
Edwards, José. 2010. “Joyful Economists: Remarks on the History of Economics and Psychology from the Happiness Studies Perspective.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 32 (04): 611–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, José. 2012. “Observing Attitudes, Intentions, and Expectations (1945–73).” History of Political Economy 44 (5): 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, José. 2014. “Consumer Power and Market Control: Exploring Consumer Behaviour in Affluent Contexts (1946–1980).” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (4): 699–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, José, and Pellé, Sophie. 2011. “Capabilities for the Miserable; Happiness for the Satisfied.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 33 (3): 335–355.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert. 1989. “Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life.” The American Economic Review 79 (2): 80–85.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1958. The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1967. The New Industrial State. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1977. The Age of Uncertainty. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Giocoli, Nicola. 2003. Modeling Rational Agents: From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
Guilford, Joy P. 1936. Psychometric Methods. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guilford, Joy P., and Helson, Harry. 1929. “Eye-Movements and the Phi-Phenomenon.” The American Journal of Psychology 41 (4): 595–606.Google Scholar
Haber, Ralph N. 1958. “Discrepancy from Adaptation Level as a Source of Affect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (4): 370–375.Google Scholar
Hands, Wade. 2010. “Economics, Psychology and the History of Consumer Choice Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (4): 633–648.Google Scholar
Hands, Wade. 2011. “Back to the Ordinalist Revolution: Behavioral Economic Concerns in Early Modern Consumer Choice Theory.” Metroeconomica 62 (2): 386–410.Google Scholar
Hands, Wade. 2012. “The Positive-Normative Dichotomy and Economics.” In Maki, Uskali, ed., Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 291–240.Google Scholar
Harlow, Harry, Hilgard, Ernest R., Leeper, Robert, Skinner, Burrhus Frederick, and Brewster Smith, M.. 1962. “Distinguished Scientific Contribution Awards: 1962.” American Psychologist 17 (12): 888–898.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1925a. “The Psychology of ‘Gestalt.’” The American Journal of Psychology 36 (3): 342–370.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1925b. “The Psychology of ‘Gestalt.’” The American Journal of Psychology 36 (4): 494–526.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1926a. “The Psychology of ‘Gestalt.’” The American Journal of Psychology 37 (1): 25–62.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1926b. “The Psychology of ‘Gestalt.’” The American Journal of Psychology 37 (2): 189–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1930. “A New Visual Phenomenon—The Cigarette Illusion.” Psychological Review 37 (3): 273–275.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1932. “Studies in the Theory of Perception. I. The Clearness-Context Theory.” Psychological Review 39 (1): 44–72.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1933. “The Fundamental Propositions of Gestalt Psychology.” Psychological Review 40 (1): 13–32.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1938. “Fundamental Problems in Color Vision. I. The Principle Governing Changes in Hue, Saturation, and Lightness of Non-Selective Samples in Chromatic Illumination.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (5): 439–476.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1942. “Multiple-Variable Analysis of Factors Affecting Lightness and Saturation.” The American Journal of Psychology 55 (1): 46–57.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1947. “Adaptation-Level as Frame of Reference for Prediction of Psychophysical Data.” The American Journal of Psychology 60 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1948. “Adaptation-Level as a Basis for a Quantitative Theory of Frames of Reference.” Psychological Review 55 (6): 297–313.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1964. Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1969. “Why Did Their Precursors Fail and the Gestalt Psychologists Succeed? Reflections on Theories and Theorists.” American Psychologist 24 (11): 1006–1011.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1970. “E. G. B.: The Early Years and Change of Course.” American Psychologist 25 (7): 625–629.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1971.” Adaptation-level Theory: 1970—and After.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry. 1972. “What Can We Learn from the History of Psychology?” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 8 (1): 115–119.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry, and Fehrer, Elizabeth. 1932. “The Role of Form in Perception.” The American Journal of Psychology 44 (1): 79–102.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry, and Jeffers, Virginia. 1940. “Fundamental Problems in Color Vision. II. Hue, Lightness, and Saturation of Selective Samples in Chromatic Illumination.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Helson, Harry, and Judd, Deane. 1932. “A Study of Photopic Adaptation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (4): 380–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heukelom, Floris. 2012. “Three Explanations for the Kahneman-Tversky Programme of the 1970s.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (5): 797–828.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1976. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, William. 1941. “Anchoring Effects in Judgment.” The American Journal of Psychology 54 (3): 395–403.Google Scholar
Judd, Deane. 1971. “Harry Helson—An Appreciation.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 305–306.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. First edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Thaler, Richard. 1991. “Economic Analysis and the Psychology of Utility: Applications to Compensation Policy.” The American Economic Review 81 (2): 341–346.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack, and Thaler, Richard. 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193–206.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Krueger, Alan, Schkade, David, Schwarz, Norbert, and Stone, Arthur. 2004. “Toward National Well-Being Accounts.” The American Economic Review 94 (2): 429–434.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt. 1922. “Perception: An Introduction to the Gestalt-Theorie.” Psychological Bulletin 19 (10): 531–585.Google Scholar
Layard, Richard. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Shira. 1996. “Economics and Psychology: Lessons for Our Own Day from the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1293–1323.Google Scholar
Linder, Staffan. 1970. The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, O’Donoghue, Ted, and Rabin, Matthew. 2003. “Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1209–1248.Google Scholar
Maas, Harro. 2005. William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mäki, Uskali, ed. 2012. Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “The Utility of Wealth.” Journal of Political Economy 60 (2): 151–158.Google Scholar
McClelland, David. 1971. “Comment.” In Appley, Mortimer H., ed., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. New York and London: Academic Press, pp. 303–304.Google Scholar
McClelland, David, Atkinson, John, Clark, Russell, and Lowell, Edgar. 1953. The Achievement Motive. The Century Psychology Series. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Walter, and Helson, Harry. 1949. “A Reformulation of the Fechner Law in Terms of Adaptation-Level Applied to Rating-Scale Data.” The American Journal of Psychology 62 (3): 355–368.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mishan, Ezra. 1960. “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–59.” The Economic Journal 70 (278): 197–265.Google Scholar
Mishan, Ezra. 1967. The Costs of Economic Growth. New York: F. A. Praeger.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. 2009. “Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory.” In Brenner, A. and Gayon, J., eds., French Studies in Philosophy of Science. New York: Springer, pp. 303–357.Google Scholar
Moscati, Ivan. 2016. “Measuring the Economizing Mind in the 1940s and 1950s.” History of Political Economy 48 (Suppl. 1): 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parducci, Allen. 1959. “An Adaptation-Level Analysis of Ordinal Effects in Judgments.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3): 239–246.Google Scholar
Rabin, Matthew. 1998. “Psychology and Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 11–46.Google Scholar
Rabin, Matthew. 2002. “A Perspective on Psychology and Economics.” European Economic Review 46 (4–5): 657–685.Google Scholar
Rogers, Spaulding. 1941. The Anchoring of Absolute Judgments. New York: Archives of Psychology.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Ernst. 1973. Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1976. The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2004. “Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics.” History of Political Economy 36 (4): 735–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, and Cantril, Hadley. 1945. “The Psychology of ‘Attitudes’: Part I.” Psychological Review 52 (6): 295–319.Google Scholar
Stevens, Stanley Smith. 1958. “Adaptation-Level vs. the Relativity of Judgment.” The American Journal of Psychology 71 (4): 633–646.Google Scholar
Svorenčík, Andrej. 2016. “The ‘Sidney Siegel’ Tradition in Experimental Economics: The Divergence of Behavioral and Experimental Economics at the End of the 1980s.” History of Political Economy 48 (Suppl. 1): 270–294.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1 (1): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Richard. 1987. “Anomalies: The January Effect.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (1): 197–201.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1991. “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–1061.Google Scholar
Woodrow, Herbert. 1937. “Absolute Scaling Applied to the Data Yielded by the Method of Constant Stimuli.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Wortman, Camille, and Coates, Dan. 1985. “Obituary: Philip Brickman (1943–1982).” American Psychologist 40 (9): 1051–1052.Google Scholar
Yarrow, Andrew. 2010. Measuring America: How Economic Growth Came to Define American Greatness in the Late Twentieth Century. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar