Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:29:20.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EMERGENCE OF GEOGRAPHICAL ECONOMICS: AT THE CONTESTED BOUNDARIES OF ECONOMICS, GEOGRAPHY, AND REGIONAL SCIENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2021

Jasmeen Rahman  and
Robert W. Dimand
Jasmeen Rahman
Affiliation:
Jasmeen Rahman: Department of Economics, Brock University, [email protected];
Robert W. Dimand*
Affiliation:
Robert Dimand, Department of Economics, Brock University, [email protected].
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We explore disciplinary boundary-making in geographical economics or “the new economic geography” with attention to the approaches taken by, and attempts at communication among, scholars with primary affiliations in economics, geography, and regional science. The Dixit-Stiglitz general equilibrium approach to monopolistic competition and increasing returns was applied to agglomeration and location by Paul Krugman, who had previously pioneered the “new trade theory” building on the Dixit-Stiglitz model, and, independently and slightly earlier, by Masahisa Fujita and his student Heshem Abdel-Rahman, starting from regional science, a tradition with its own departments, doctorates, conferences, and journals distinct from economics and geography. Economic geography, as studied by geographers, had already taken a quantitative and theoretical turn in the 1960s, reviving an earlier tradition of German location theory overshadowed within geography after World War II by areal differentiation. Another strand of economic geography pursued by geographers was influenced by economic theory but by non-neoclassical Marxian and Sraffian economics. Debates between these scholars raised questions whether these analyses were multidisciplinary, drawing on distinct disciplines, or crossed disciplinary boundaries (as when geographical economics in the style of economists is undertaken in geography departments) or transcends disciplinary boundaries, or involved the emergence of a new discipline.

Type
Symposium: Economics and its Boundaries
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 241 - 261
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful for helpful comments from two anonymous referees and from participants in the Association Charles Gide workshop on “Economics and Its Boundaries” at TELUQ, Montreal, June 25 to 27, 2019.

References

REFERENCES

Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M. 1988. “Product Differentiation, Monopolistic Competition and City Size.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 18 (1): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M. 1990. “Agglomeration Economies, Types, and Sizes of Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics 27 (1): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M. 1996. “When do Cities Specialize in Production?” Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M., and Fujita, Masahisa. 1990. “Product Variety, Marshallian Externalities and City Sizes.” Journal of Regional Science 30 (2): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel-Rahman, Hesham M., and Wang, Ping. 1995. “Toward a General Equilibrium Theory of a Core-Periphery System of Cities.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 25 (4): 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, Ash, and Thrift, Nigel J.. 2000. “What Kind of Economic Theory for What Kind of Economic Geography?” Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography 32 (1): 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, Forslid, Rikard, Martin, Philippe, Ottaviano, Gianmarco, and Robert-Nicoud, Frederic. 2003. Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Trevor J. 2003. “What’s Wrong with American Regional Science? A View from Science Studies.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 25 (1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Barnes, Trevor J. 2004a. “The Rise (and Decline) of American Regional Science: Lessons for the New Economic Geography?” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (2): 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Trevor J. 2004b. “Review of Isard (2003).” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (2): 222–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, Martin J., and Thisse, Jaçques-François. 1986. “The Location of Production.” In Nijkamp, Peter, ed., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume I. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher, pp. 21–95.Google Scholar
Behrens, Kristian, and Robert-Nicoud, Frédéric. 2009. “Krugman’s Papers in Regional Science: The 100 Dollar Bill on the Sidewalk Is Gone and the 2008 Nobel Prize Well-Deserved.” Papers in Regional Science 88 (2): 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliant, Marcus. 2006. “Well Isn’t That Spatial?! Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4: A View from Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Geography 6 (1): 107–110.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1999. The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Brian J. L., ed. 1978. The Nature of Change in Geographical Ideas. Perspectives in Geography 3. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Brian J. L., and Garrison, William L.. 1958. “Recent Developments of Central Place Theory.” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 4: 107–120. Reprinted in William H. Leahy, David L. McKee, and Robert D. Dean, eds., 1970. Urban Economics: Theory, Development and Planning. New York: Free Press, 1970, pp. 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billinge, Mark, Gregory, Derek, and Martin, Ron, eds. 1984. Recollections of a Revolution: Geography as Spatial Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1979. “The German Hegemony of Location Theory: A Puzzle in the History of Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 11 (1): 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, Steven, and Garretsen, Harry. 2009. “Trade and Geography: Paul Krugman and the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics.” Spatial Economic Analysis 4 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bröcker, Johannes. 2015. “German Roots of Regional Science.” In Nijkamp, Peter, Rose, Adam, and Kourtit, Karima, eds., Regional Science Matters: Studies Dedicated to Walter Isard. Berlin: Springer, ch. 6, pp. 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, William. 1962. Theoretical Geography. Lund Studies in Geography, Series C, General and Mathematical Geography, No. 1. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bunge, William. [1971] 2011. Fitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution. With new foreword by Heynen, Nik and Barnes, Trevor. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, William. 1979. “Perspective on Theoretical Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (1): 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Ian. 1963. “The Quantitative Revolution and Theoretical Geography.” Canadian Geographer 7 (4): 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Alan. 1999. What Is This Thing Called Science? Third edition. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Chorley, Richard J., and Haggett, Peter, eds. 1967. Models in Geography. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., Gertler, Meric S., and Feldman, Maryann, eds. 2000. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christaller, Walter. 1933. Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Translated as The Central Places of Southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Dean, William H. Jr. 1938. The Theory of Geographical Location of Economic Activity. Ann Arbor, MI: Edward Brothers (selections from Harvard PhD dissertation in economics).Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K., and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67 (3): 297–308.Google Scholar
Eaton, B. Curtis, and Lipsey, Richard G.. 1997. On the Foundations of Monopolistic Competition and Economic Geography: The Selected Essays of B. Curtis Eaton and Richard G. Lipsey. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Economist, The. 1999. “Economics Focus: Knowing your place: Economists say they have rediscovered geography. Geographers are interested to hear it. They didn’t know they had been away.” March 13, p. 92.Google Scholar
Entrikin, J. Nicholas, and Brunn, Stanley D., eds. 1989. Reflections on Richard Hartshorne’s The Nature of Geography. Washington, DC: Occasional Publications of the Association of American Geographers No. 1.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. [1800] 2012. The Closed Commercial State. Translated by Adler, Anthony Curtis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Forslid, Rikard, and Ottaviano, Gianmarco P.. 2003. “An Analytically Solvable Core-Periphery Model.” Journal of Economic Geography 3 (3): 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Thomas W. 1961. A Hundred Years of Geography. Chicago: Aldine and London, Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa. 1988. “A Monopolistic Competition Model of Spatial Agglomeration: A Differentiated Product Approach.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 18 (1): 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa. 1989. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa. 1999. “Location and Space-Economy at Half a Century: Revisiting Professor Isard’s Dream of a General Theory.” Annals of Regional Science 33 (4): 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa. 2011. “Thünen and the New Economic Geography.” RIETI discussion paper 11-E-074.Google Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Krugman, Paul R.. 1995. “When Is the Economy Monocentric? Von Thünen and Chamberlin Unified.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 25 (4): 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Krugman, Paul R.. 2004. “The New Economic Geography: Past, Present and the Future.” In Florax, Raymond J. G. M. and Plane, David, eds., Fifty Years of Regional Science. Berlin: Springer, pp. 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Thisse, Jacques-François. 1986. “Spatial Competition with a Land Market: Hotelling and Von Thünen Unified.” Review of Economic Studies 53 (5): 819–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Thisse, Jacques-François. [2002] 2013. Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location and Economic Growth. Second edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, and Thisse, Jacques-François. 2009. “New Economic Geography: An Appraisal on the Occasion of Paul Krugman’s 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahisa, Krugman, Paul R., and Venables, Anthony J.. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretsen, Harry, and Martin, Ron. 2010. “Rethinking (New) Economic Geography Models: Taking Geography and History More Seriously.” Spatial Economic Analysis 5 (2): 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, William L. 1959–60. “Spatial Structure of the Economy I, II, III.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 49 (2): 232–239; 49 (4): 471–482; 50 (3): 357–373. Reprinted in Robert H. T. Smith, Edward J. Taaffe, and Leslie J. King, eds., Readings in Economic Geography: The Location of Economic Activity. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1968, pp. 230–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1953. Innovationsförloppet ur korologisk synpukt. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup. Translated as Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Translated by Allan Pred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Haggett, Peter. 1965. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Edward Arnold. Second edition as Haggett, Peter, Cliff, Andrew D., and Frey, Allan, Locational Models. New York: John Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Richard. 1927. “Location as a Factor in Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 17 (2): 92–99. Reprinted in Robert H. T. Smith, Edward J. Taaffe, and Leslie J. King, eds., Readings in Economic Geography: The Location of Economic Activity. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1959, pp. 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, Richard. [1939] 1961. The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in Light of the Past. Lancaster, PA: Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Richard. 1959. Perspectives on the Nature of Geography. Association of American Geographers Monograph No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally; and London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1969. Explanation in Geography. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Head, Keith, and Mayer, Thierry. 2004. “The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade.” In Henderson, J. Vernon and Thisse, Jean-François, eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4. Amsterdam: Nporth-Holland, pp. 2609–2669.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. Vernon. 1974. “The Sizes and Types of Cities.” American Economic Review 64 (4): 640–656.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. Vernon. 1996. “Ways to Think about Urban Concentration: Neoclassical Urban Systems versus the New Economic Geography.” International Regional Science Review 19 (1): 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39 (153): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter. 1949. “The General Theory of Location and Space Economy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 63 (4): 476–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter. 1954. “Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 68 (2): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter. 1956. Location and Space-Economy; A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. Cambridge, MA: Published jointly by the Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Wiley.Google Scholar
Isard, Walter. 1979. “Notes on the Origins, Development, and Future of Regional Science.” Papers in Regional Science 43 (1): 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isard, Walter. 2003. History of Regional Science and the Regional Science Association International. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isserman, Andrew M. 1993. “Lost in Space? On the History, Status and Future of Regional Science.” Review of Regional Studies 23 (1): 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isserman, Andrew M. 1996. “‘It’s Obvious, It’s Wrong, and Anyway They Said It Years Ago’: Paul Krugman on Large Cities.” International Regional Science Review 19 (1–2): 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Harry G. 1971. “The Keynesian Revolution and the Monetarist Counter-Revolution.” American Economic Review 61 (2): 1–14.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ronald J. 1979. Geography and Geographers: Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945. London: Edward Arnold and New York: Halsted, pp. 155–183.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ronald J. 2010. “Human Geography.” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe, eds., The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, ch. 7.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1980. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1990. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1991a. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1991b. Geography and Trade. Gaston Eyskens Lectures. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1995. Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Ohlin Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1996. “Urban Concentration: The Role of Increasing Returns and Transport Costs.” International Regional Science Review 19 (1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1998a. “Space: The Final Frontier.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2): 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1998b. “What’s New about the New Economic Geography?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (2): 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 2000. “Where in the World Is the ‘New Economic Geography’?” In Clark, Gordon L., Gertler, Meric S., and Feldman, Maryann, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1999. Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution: Studies of the Inter-war Literature on Money, the Cycle and Unemployment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Launhardt, Wilhelm. 1885. Mathematische Begründung der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Leipzig: Teubner. Translated as Mathematical Principles of Economics. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar, 1993.Google Scholar
Leahy, William H., McKee, David L., and Dean, Robert D., eds. 1970. Urban Economics: Theory, Development and Planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lösch, August. 1940. Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Jena: Gustav Fisher. Translated as The Economics of Location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Mäki, Uskali. 2004. “Realism and the Nature of Theory: A Lesson from J. H. von Thünen for Economists and Geographers.” Environment and Planning A (36): 1719–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, Uskali, and Marchionni, Caterina. 2011. “Is Geographical Economics Imperializing Economic Geography?” Journal of Economic Geography 11 (4): 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchionni, Caterina. 2004. “Geographical Economics versus Economic Geography: Towards a Clarification of the Dispute.” Environment and Planning A (36): 1737–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Geoffrey J. 2005. All Possible Worlds: A History of Geographical Ideas. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Ron. 1999. “The New ‘Geographical Turn’ in Economics: Some Critical Reflections.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ron, and Sunley, Peter, eds. 2007. Critical Concepts in Economic Geography. Volumes 1–5. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meardon, Stephen J. 2000. “Eclecticism, Innovation and Inconsistency in the History of Geographical Economics.” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Biddle, Jeff, eds., “Toward a History of Applied Economics.” Annual supplement, History of Political Economy 25: 325–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, J. Peter. 2001. “Of Hype and Hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2): 536–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlin, Bertil. 1933. International and Interregional Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Overman, Henry G. 2004. “Can We Learn Anything from Economic Geography Proper?” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (5): 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palander, Tord. 1935. Beiträge zur Standortstheorie. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Peet, Richard, and Thrift, Nigel J., eds. 1988. New Models in Geography. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Perreur, Jacky. 1998. “Industrial Location Theory in German Thought—Launhardt and Weber.” Louvain Economic Review 64 (1): 75.Google Scholar
Ponsard, Claude. [1958] 1983. History of Spatial Economic Theory. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Predöhl, Andreas. 1928. “The Theory of Location in Its Relation to General Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 36 (3): 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proost, Stef, and Thisse, Jean-François. 2019. “What Can Be Learned from Spatial Economics?” Journal of Economic Literature 57 (3): 575–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puga, Diego, and Wrigley, Neil. 2004. “Editorial: Establishing its Position.” Journal of Economic Geography 4 (2): 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebours, Anthony. 2018. “The Interactions Between Economics and Geography (1980–2015): A Bibliometric History.” Paper presented to History of Economics Society, Loyola University, Chicago, June 15.Google Scholar
Redding, Stephen J. 2008. “Economic Geography: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature.” Discussion Paper, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. [1817] 1951. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In Sraffa, Piero with Dobb, Maurice, eds., Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Volume I. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosser, J. Barkley. 2011. Complex Evolutionary Dynamics in Urban-Regional and Ecologic-Economic Systems: From Catastrophe to Chaos and Beyond. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1952. “Economic Theory and Mathematics: An Appraisal.” American Economic Review 42 (2): 56–66.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1983. “Thünen at Two Hundred.” Journal of Economic Literature 21 (4): 1468–1488.Google Scholar
Scott, Allen J. 1998. Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Allen J. 2000. “Economic Geography: The Great Half-Century.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24 (4): 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Allen J. 2006. Geography and the Economy: Three Lectures. Clarendon Lectures in Geography and Environmental Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Eric. 2000. “Geography or Economics? Conceptions of Space, Time, Agency, and Interdependence.” In Clark, Gordon L., Gertler, Meric S., and Feldman, Maryann, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–124.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Eric. 2001. “How Economists Think: About Geography, For Example.” Journal of Economic Geography 1 (1): 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Eric, and Barnes, Trevor J.. 1990. The Capitalist Space Economy: Geographical Analysis after Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Eric, and Barnes, Trevor J., eds. 2003. A Companion to Economic Geography. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1970. The Wealth of Nations. Books I–III. Edited by Skinner, Andrew. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stamp, Sir Josiah C. 1937. “Geography and Economic Theory.” Geography 22 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1984. “Economics—The Imperial Science?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86 (3): 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolper, Wolfgang F. 1954. “August Lösch in Memoriam.” In Lösch, August, The Economics of Location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Thisse, Jacques-François. 2011. “Geographical Economics: Historical Perspective.” Recherches Economiques De Louvain/Louvain Economic Review 77 (2–3): 141–168.Google Scholar
Thisse, Jacques-François. 2016. “Economic Geography.” In Faccarello, Gilbert and Kurz, Heinz, eds., Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis. Volume 3. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Thünen, Johann H. von. 1826–63. Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Three volumes. Hamburg: Perthes. Translated as The Isolated State in Relation to Agriculture and Political Economy. Part II (1826) in Bernard Dempsey, SJ, The Frontier Wage, Chicago: Jesuit Studies, 1960; Part I (1850) translated by Carla M. Wartenberg and edited by Peter Hall, Oxford: Pergammon Press, 1966; Part III (1863) translated by Keith Tribe and edited by Ulrich van Suntum with preface by Paul Samuelson, Bastingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar
Ullman, Edward. 1941. “A Theory of Location for Cities.” American Journal of Sociology 46: 853–864. Reprinted in William H. Leahy, David L. McKee, and Robert D. Dean, eds., Urban Economics: Theory, Development and Planning. New York: Free Press, 1970, pp. 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, Edward. 1962. “The Nature of Cities Reconsidered.” Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 9: 7–23. Reprinted in William H. Leahy, David L. McKee, and Robert D. Dean, eds., Urban Economics: Theory, Development and Planning. New York: Free Press, 1970, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Alfred. 1909. Ueber den Standort der Industrien, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Translated as The Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.Google Scholar