Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:10:19.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EDMOND MALINVAUD’S CRITICISMS OF THE NEW CLASSICAL ECONOMICS: RESTORING THE NATURE AND THE RATIONALE OF THE OLD KEYNESIANS’ OPPOSITION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

Matthieu Renault
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unlike standard accounts, recent research in the history of macroeconomics has given increasing attention to the Old Keynesians’ criticisms of the New Classical Economics. In this paper, I address the case of Edmond Malinvaud, who began opposing the New Classical Economics from the early 1980s and did so throughout the following thirty years. This study shows that his opposition was radical, i.e., multi-dimensional and systematic, and owes to the methodology and the practice of macroeconometric modeling. In turn, this twofold result sheds light on the nature and the rationale of the Old Keynesians’ opposition to the New Classical Economics from the 1970s onwards, which can be interpreted along the same lines.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 563 - 585
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Matthieu Renault: Université Côte d’Azur. I am grateful to Pedro Duarte for his careful readings and sound advice. I benefited from the helpful comments of Richard Lipsey (who dropped his anonymity during the refereeing process), Mauro Boianovsky, Marcel Boumans, Antonella Rancan, Michaël Assous, Aurélien Goutsmedt, Francesco Sergi, Erich Pinzón-Fuchs, Matthieu Ballandonne, Adrien Villa, and participants at the HES (Chicago 2018), the ESHET (Madrid 2018), and the ANPEC conferences (Rio 2018), and seminars at the University São Paulo (FEA-USP) and Paris 1. Comments and suggestions by two anonymous referees, as well as by JHET’s editor Jimena Hurtado, helped improve the quality of this paper. Special thanks are due to Helena Ciorra for her excellent research assistance. Research funding from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) is gratefully acknowledged. The usual caveat applies.

References

REFERENCES

Armatte, Michel, Cot, Annie, Mairesse, Jacques, and Renault, Matthieu. 2017. “Edmond Malinvaud and the Problem of Statistical Induction.” Annals of Economics and Statistics 125–126: 79–111.Google Scholar
Assous, Michaël. 2015. “Solow’s Struggle with Medium-Run Macroeconomics, 1956–95.” History of Political Economy 47 (3): 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assous, Michaël. 2017. “Review of Michel de Vroey’s A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 10 (1): 112–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Boianovsky, Mauro. 2013. Transforming Modern Macroeconomics: Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Cherrier, Beatrice. 2019. “The Ordinary Business of Macroeconometric Modeling: Working on the Fed-MIT-Penn Model, 1964–74.” History of Political Economy 51 (3): 425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballandonne, Matthieu, and Rubin, Goulven. 2020. “Robert Solow’s Non-Walrasian Conception of Economics.” History of Political Economy 52 (5): 827–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier. 2000. “What Do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1375–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan. 1986. “Keynes after Lucas.” Eastern Economic Journal 12 (3): 209–216.Google Scholar
Blinder, Alan. 1987. “Keynes, Lucas, and Scientific Progress.” American Economic Review 77 (2): 130–136.Google Scholar
Blinder, Alan. 1988. “The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics.” Economic Record 64 (4): 278–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan. 2001. “Keeping the Keynesian Faith.” Edited by Snowdon, Brian. World Economics 2 (2): 105–140.Google Scholar
Buiter, Willem. 1980. “The Macroeconomics of Dr. Pangloss: A Critical Survey of the New Classical Macroeconomics.” The Economic Journal 90 (357): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, Danilo. 2017. “The First Keynesian Reactions to Lucas’s Macroeconomics of Equilibrium.” Paper presented at the the Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University. Available online: https://hope.econ.duke.edu/node/1342.Google Scholar
De Vroey, Michel. 2016. A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vroey, Michel, and Duarte, Pedro. 2013. “In Search of Lost Time: The Neoclassical Synthesis.” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 13 (1): 965–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechaux, Pierrick. 2017. “L’économie face aux enquêtes psychologiques 1944-1960 : unité de la science économique, diversité des pratiques.” PhD, diss. Paris 1 Université Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Drèze, Jacques, and Malinvaud, Edmond. 1994. “Growth and Employment: The Scope of a European Initiative.” European Economic Review 38 (3): 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Pedro. 2012. “Not Going Away? Microfoundations in the Making of a New Consensus in Macroeconomics.” In Duarte, Pedro and Lima, Gilberto, eds., Microfoundations Reconsidered. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 190–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Ray. 1992. “The Cowles Commission Approach, Real Business Cycle Theories, and New-Keynesian Economics.” In Belongia, Michael and Garfinkel, Michelle, eds., The Business Cycle: Theories and Evidence. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Yann. 2014. “Negotiating the ‘Middle-of-the-Road’ Position: Paul Samuelson, MIT, and the Politics of Textbook Writing, 1945–55.” History of Political Economy 46 (suppl. 1): 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsmedt, Aurélien. 2019. “Macroeconomics at the Crossroads: Stagflation and the Struggle between ‘Keynesian’ and New Classical Macroeconometric Programs.” OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/y364t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsmedt, Aurélien, Pinzón-Fuchs, Erich, Renault, Matthieu, and Sergi, Francesco. 2015. “Criticizing the Lucas Critique: Macroeconometricians’ Response to Robert Lucas.” SSRN Working Paper 2837766. Rochester, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsmedt, Aurélien, Pinzón-Fuchs, Erich, Renault, Matthieu, and Sergi, Francesco. 2019. “Reacting to the Lucas Critique: The Keynesians’ Pragmatic Replies.” History of Political Economy 51 (3): 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsmedt, Aurélien, and Rubin, Goulven. 2018. “Robert J. Gordon and the Introduction of the Natural Rate Hypothesis in the Keynesian Framework.” History of Economic Ideas 26 (3): 157–187.Google Scholar
Hansen, Peter, and Heckman, James. 1996. “The Empirical Foundations of Calibration.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kevin. 2012. “Microfoundational Programs.” In Duarte, Pedro and Lima, Gilberto, eds., Microfoundations Reconsidered. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence. 1992. “Some Tendencies in Modern Econometrics.” Indian Economic Review 27: 5–14.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn, and Prescott, Edward. 1977. “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans.” Journal of Political Economy 85 (3): 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, Finn, and Prescott, Edward. 1982. “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations.” Econometrica 50 (6): 1345–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, Richard, Nickell, Stephen, and Jackman, Richard. 1991. Underemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Richard. 2000. “IS-LM, Keynesianism, and the New Classicism.” In Backhouse, Roger and Salanti, Andrea, eds., Macroeconomics and the Real World. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar
Lipsey, Richard. 2001. “Successes and Failures in the Transformation of Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2): 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, Richard. 2016. “The Phillips Curve and an Assumed Unique Macroeconomic Equilibrium in Historical Context.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 38 (4): 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert. 1972. “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 4 (2): 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert. 1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1): 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert, and Sargent, Thomas. 1979. “After Keynesian Macroeconomics.” In After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1966. Statistical Methods of Econometrics. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1977. The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1980. Profitability and Unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1981. “Econometrics Faced with the Needs of Macroeconomic Policy.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1363–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1982. “Où en est la théorie macroéconomique?” Revue Européenne Des Sciences Sociales 20 (62): 5–22.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1984. Mass Unemployment. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1985a. “Le marché du travail en déséquilibre.” In Barrère, Alain, ed., Keynes aujourd’hui: théories et politiques. Paris: Economica, pp. 462–477.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1985b. “Sur l’analyse macroéconomique du chômage.” L’Actualité Économique 61 (2): 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1985c. “Unemployment Insurance.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 10 (34): 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1987a. “The Challenge of Macroeconomic Understanding.” PSL Quarterly Review 40 (162): 219–238.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1987b. “La courbe de Beveridge.” In AFSE, ed., Flexibilité, Mobilité et Stimulants économiques. Paris: Nathan, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1989a. “Lessons to Be Learned from the European Unemployment of the 80s.” The Pakistan Development Review 28 (4): 311–333.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1989b. “Observation in Macroeconomic Theory Building.” European Economic Review 33 (2–3): 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1990. “Microéconomie et macroéconomie relèvent-elles des mêmes principes méthodologiques?” In AFSE, ed., La Méthodologie de l’économie théorique et appliquée aujourd’hui. Paris: Nathan, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1991a. “Incomplete Market Clearing.” In McKenzie, Lionel and Zamagni, Stefano, eds., Value and Capital: Fifty Years Later. London: Macmillan, pp. 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1991b. “Macroeconomics and Market Failures.” In Information, Strategy and Public Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 104–123.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1991c. Voies de la recherche macroéconomique. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1994a. Diagnosing Unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1994b. “Statistiques, analyse économique et économétrie pour la connaissance de l’emploi.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 130 (3): 251–265.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1995. “Sur l’hypothèse de rationalité en théorie macro-économique.” Revue Économique 46 (3): 523–536.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1997a. “The Proper Role of Theory.” In Van Bergeijk, Peter, ed., Economic Science and Practice: The Roles of Academic Economists and Policy-Makers. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 149–165.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1997b. “L’économétrie dans l’élaboration théorique et l’étude des politiques.” L’Actualité Économique 73 (1–2–3): 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1998a. “La modélisation en macroéconomie appliquée: quarante ans après.” Brussels Economic Review 160 (4): 329–342.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 1998b. Macroeconomic Theory: A Textbook on Macroeconomic Knowledge and Analysis. Three volumes. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2000a. “The Role of Business Survey Data in Macroeconomic Research and Practice.” In Poser, Günter and Bloesch, Daniel, eds., Economic Surveys and Data Analysis. Paris: OECD, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2000b. “The Role of Structural Policies Meant to Promote Employment.” Rivista Di Politica Economica 90 (12): 9–32.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2001. “Some Ethical and Methodological Convictions.” The American Economist 45 (1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2003. “Réformes structurelles du marché du travail et politiques macroéconomiques.” Revue de l’OFCE 3 (86): 7–30.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2004. “The Difficult Dialogue between the Development of Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Policy Concerns.” In Velupillai, Vela, ed., Macroeconomic Theory and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Jean-Paul Fitoussi. London: Routledge, pp. 128–144.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2007a. “About the Role, in Older Days, of Econometrics in Quantitative Economics.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2007b. “Quelle place donner maintenant à la macroéconomie dans l’enseignement de l’économétrie?” Revue d’économie Politique 117 (3): 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, Edmond. 2009. “La réévaluation de la stratégie de l’OCDE pour l’emploi: deux pistes d’amélioration.” Travail et Emploi 118: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, Gregory. 1990. “A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics.” Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4): 1645–1660.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 1977. “The Monetarist Controversy or, Should We Forsake Stabilization Policies?” American Economic Review 67 (2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Neary, Peter, and Stiglitz, Joseph. 1983. “Toward a Reconstruction of Keynesian Economics: Expectations and Constrained Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (suppl.): 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 1994. The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Plassard, Romain, Renault, Matthieu, and Rubin, Goulven. Forthcoming. “Modeling Market Dynamics: Jean-Pascal Bénassy, Edmond Malinvaud, and the Development of Disequilibrium Macroeconomics.” History of Economic Ideas. Google Scholar
Rancan, Antonella. 2020. “From Dynamics to Stabilisation: Albert Ando and Franco Modigliani’s Contributions to the Theory of Economic Growth and Fluctuations (1959–1970).” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (4): 635–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renault, Matthieu. 2016. “Edmond Malinvaud, entre science et action. Chronique d’une macroéconomie en transition.” PhD diss., Paris 1 Université Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Renault, Matthieu. 2019. “Theory to the Rescue of the Macroeconometric Models: Edmond Malinvaud’s Alternative View on Microfoundations.” SSRN Working Paper 3434008. Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Sergi, Francesco. 2020. “The Standard Narrative about DSGE models in Central Banks’ Technical Reports.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (2): 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher A. 1980. “Macroeconomics and Reality.” Econometrica 48 (1): 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1978. “Summary and Evaluation.” In After the Phillips Curve: Persistence of High Inflation and High Unemployment. Boston: Federal Reserve of Boston, pp. 203–209.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1983. “Cowles and the Tradition of Macroeconomics.” Paper presented at the Cowles Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration, June 3. https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/conf/50th/50th-solow.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2020.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1984. “Interview with Robert Solow.” In Klamer, Arjo, ed., Conversations with Economists. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, pp. 127–148.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 1985. “Reflections on Macroeconomic Modeling: Confessions of a DRI Addict.” Eastern Economic Journal 11 (1): 79–83.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert. 2008. “Comment.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 243–249.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1972. “Inflation and Unemployment.” American Economic Review 62 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1977. “How Dead Is Keynes?” Economic Inquiry 15 (4): 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, James. 1980a. “Are New Classical Models Plausible Enough to Guide Policy?” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12 (4): 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, James. 1980b. Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity: Reflections on Contemporary Macroeconomic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1984. “Interview with James Tobin.” In Klamer, Arjo, ed., Conversations with Economists. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld, pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1992. “An Old Keynesian Counterattacks.” Eastern Economic Journal 18 (4): 387–400.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1993. “Price Flexibility and Output Stability: An Old Keynesian View.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (1): 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, James. 1995. “The Natural Rate as New Classical Macroeconomics.” In Cross, Rod, ed., The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 Years of the Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, Michael. 1999. “Revolution and Evolution in Twentieth-Century Macroeconomics.” In Frontiers of the Mind in the Twenty-First Century. Washington DC: U.S. Library of Congress.Google Scholar