Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:11:23.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Hume's Account of Luxury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Andrew S. Cunningham
Andrew S. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Visiting Scholar, Department of Philosophy, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholarly discussions of the eighteenth-century luxury controversy invariably acknowledge the important role of David Hume, usually identifying him as one of the first to have made a strong case against the traditional view that luxury is morally corrupt and inimical to the survival of the state. But, having said this, they tend to treat Hume rather summarily, often focusing exclusively on the 1752 essay “Of Refinement in the Arts” and generally agreeing with one leading commentator that “Hume's arguments are straightforward, and can be dealt with briefly.” On closer examination, however, it appears that Hume's treatment of luxury was more complex in its historical development, and more subtle in its final form, than some have supposed. The first part of the following discussion considers the historical progression of Hume's thinking while the second consists in an analysis of “Refinement,” with particular attention to an important but overlooked distinction between the appropriate moral and political responses to luxury.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 231 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, C. J. (1994) The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffentzis, C. G. (2001) Hume, Money, and Civilization; or, Why Was Hume a Metallist?, Hume Studies, 27 (11), pp. 301–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (1733) An Enquiry into the Original of Moral Virtue (Edinburgh, Scotland).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. B. (1992) On the History of Economic Thought: British and American Economic Essays (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. S. (forthcoming) Hume's Vitalism and Its Implications, The British Journal for the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Dennis, J. (1711) An Essay upon Publick Spirit: Being a Satyr in Prose upon the Manners and Luxury of the Times, the Chief Sources of our present Parties and Divisions (London).Google Scholar
Dennis, J. (1724) Vice and Luxury Public Mischiefs: Or Remarks on a Book Intituled, The Fable ofthe Bees; or Private Vices Publick Benefits, in: Stafford, J. Martin (Ed.) Private Vices, Publick Benefits? (Solihull: Ismeron, 1997).Google Scholar
Fawconer, S. (1765) An Essay on Modern Luxury: Or, An Attempt to Delineate its Nature, Causes, and Effects (London).Google Scholar
Furniss, E. S. (1920) The Position of the Laborer in a System of Nationalism: A Study in the Labor Theories of the Later English Mercantilists (New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965).Google Scholar
JrGriswold, C. L. (1999) Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. (1992) Classical Economics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1739–1740) A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1741a) Of Civil Liberty, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1741b) Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1741c) Whether the British Government Inclines More to Absolute Monarchy, or to a Republic, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1748) A True Account of the Behaviour and Conduct of Archibald Stewart, Esq; late Lord Provost of Edinburgh (London).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1751a) An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1751b) Letter to Mrs. Dysart of Eccles, in: Greig, J. Y. T. (Ed.) The Letters of David Hume (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752a) Of Refinement in the Arts, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752b) Of Commerce, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752c) Of Interest, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752d) Of Money, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752e) Of Public Credit, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1752f) Of Taxes, in: Miller, E. (Ed.) Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1754) Letter to John Wilkes, October 8, 1754, in: Greig, J. Y. T. (Ed.) The Letters of David Hume (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1754–1762) The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to The Revolution in 1688 (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1985).Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. (1726a) An Inquiry concerning the Original of our Ideas of Virtue or Moral Good (London).Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. (1726b) Letter to the Author of the Dublin Weekly Journal, February 12, 1726, in: J. Martin Stafford, Private Vices, Publick Benefits? (Solihull: Ismeron, 1997).Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. (1738) An Inquiry concerning the Original of our Ideas of Virtue or Moral Good, in: SirSelby-Bigge, L. A. (Ed.) British Moralists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1897).Google Scholar
Johnson, E. A. J. (1937) Predecessors of Adam Smith: The Growth of British Economic Thought (New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965).Google Scholar
Jones, E. (1736) Luxury, Pride and Vanity, the Bane of the British Nation (London).Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. (1705–1729) The Fable of the Bees (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1988).Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G. (2000) Luxury, Economic Development, and Work Motivation: David Hume, Adam Smith, and J. R. McCulloch, History of Political Economy, 32 (Fall), pp. 631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melon, J.-F. (1734) A Political Essay upon Commerce (Dublin, 1738).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C.-L. de Secondat (Baron) (1721) Persian Letters (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C. (1954) The Life of David Hume (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
Pinto, I. de (1762) A. Essay on Luxury (London, 1766).Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H. (1970) Hume and Isaac de Pinto, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 12 (Spring), pp. 417–30.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H. (1976) Isaac de Pinto's Criticism of Mandeville and Hume on Luxury, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 154, pp. 1705–714.Google Scholar
Raven, J. (1995) Defending Conduct and Property: The London Press and the Luxury Debate, in: Brewer, J. and Staves, S. (Ed.) Early Modern Conceptions of Property (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Robertson, J. (1985) The Scottish Enlightenment and the Militia Issue (Edinburgh: John Donald).Google Scholar
Rotwein, E. (1955) David Hume: Writings on Economics (New York: Nelson).Google Scholar
Sekora, J. (1977) Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1759) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Haakonssen, Knud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, J. M. (1997) Private Vices, Publick Benefits? (Solihull: Ismeron).Google Scholar
Stafford, J. M. (1999) Hume on Luxury: A Response to John Dennis?, History of Political Thought, 20 (Winter), pp. 646–48.Google Scholar
Trenchard, J. (1721) The Independent Whig (27) July 20, 1720 (London).Google Scholar