Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:17:31.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CLASHING ANALYSES OF SPECULATION AND THE EARLY REGULATION OF US FUTURES MARKETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

John Berdell  and
Jin Wook Choi
John Berdell
Affiliation:
DePaul University.
Jin Wook Choi
Affiliation:
DePaul University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the early regulation of futures markets in the 1920s and 1930s. We contrast the analysis of speculation developed by the Grain Futures Administration (GFA) with Holbrook Working’s. Within the GFA we focus on Paul Mehl, who directed the statistical analysis of order flows, trade volumes, and positions that supported the GFA’s policy recommendations. In retrospect Working was the most prominent academic analyst of futures markets. The relationship between the GFA and Working was complex and at times intimately collaborative, but the New Deal provoked sharp disagreement. Working rejected the tighter trading rules advocated by the GFA as counterproductive and tried to persuade the Secretary of Agriculture to embrace a discretionary approach to regulation based upon his analysis of neighboring futures prices (the Working curve) and his distinctive conception of “perfect markets”—a nuanced version of the subsequent efficient market hypothesis.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 539 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We acknowledge funding from the Driehaus College of Business and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group (CME) Foundation, which is affiliated with the CME. The CME is regulated by the CFTC, the successor to the CEA and GFA. The views presented here are strictly those of the authors alone. We thank Ryan Cummings and Alex Kfoury for excellent research assistance. Pamela Anderson of the National Archives in Kansas City provided essential guidance and assistance with the GFA/CEA archive. Jae Lurie, Project Archivist for the CME Group of records at the University of Illinois Chicago, was an invaluable ally in tracking down relevant material in the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) archives. We thank as well Daniel May, librarian of the CFTC. We thank Mary Morgan, Scott Irwin, Paul Peterson, Steven Stigler, Jim Ciecka, Virginia France, Joe Persky, and Humberto Barreto for comments. Anonymous referees provided very helpful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Aulerich, Nicole M., Irwin, Scott H., and Garcia, Philip. 2012. “Bubbles, Food Prices, and Speculation: Evidence from the CFTC’s Daily Large Trader Data Files.” The Economics of Food Price Volatility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 253–259.Google Scholar
Bailey, Liberty Hyde, and Bailey, Ethel Zoe. 1925. Rus: A Biographical Register of Rural Leadership in the United States and Canada. Ithaca, NY: [s.n.].Google Scholar
Biddle, Jeff. 1999. “Statistical Economics, 1900–1950.” History of Political Economy 31 (4): 607–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyuksahin, Bahattin, Haigh, Michael S., Harris, Jeffrey H., Overdahl, James A., and Robe, Michel A.. 2008. “Fundamentals, Trader Activity and Derivative Pricing.” EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CFTC and SEC. 2010. “Preliminary Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010. Report of the Staffs of the CFTC and SEC to the Joint Advisory Committee on Emerging Regulatory Issues.” Washington: The Authors.Google Scholar
Cowles, Alfred 3rd. 1933. “Can Stock Market Forecasters Forecast?” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1 (3): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Alfred 3rd, and Jones, Herbert E.. 1937. “Some A Posteriori Probabilities in Stock Market Action.” Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society 5 (3): 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristiano, Carlo, and Paesani, Paolo. 2012. “Kaldor and the Relationship Between ‘Normal Backwardation’and the Theory of Storage.” Speculation and Regulation in Commodity Markets: The Keynesian Approach in Theory and Practice. MPRA Paper. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44131/p. 129. Accessed 15 July 2018.Google Scholar
Duvel, Joseph William Tell. 1904. The Vitality and Germination of Seeds. Washington: US Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duvel, Joseph William Tell. 1911. “A Grain Tester for Commercial Use.” Scientific American 72: 92–94.Google Scholar
Duvel, Joseph William Tell, and Hoffman, George Wright. 1928. Major Transactions in the 1926 December Wheat Futures. Technical Bulletin 79. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Duvel, Joseph William Tell, Hoffman, George Wright, and United States Grain Futures Administration. 1927. Speculative Transactions in the 1926 May Wheat Future. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Etienne, Xiaoli L., Irwin, Scott H., and Garcia, Philip. 2015. “Price Explosiveness, Speculation, and Grain Futures Prices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (1): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1930. Methods of Correlation Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1941. Methods of Correlation Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grain Futures Administration. 1924. “Trading in Grain Futures, Comunication from the Secretary of Agriculture Transmitting in Response to Senate Resolution No. 9 Agreed to January 8, 1924, The Report of The Grain Futures Comission Under The Grain Futures Act, September 21, 1922, In Respect to Trading in Grain Futures on the Chicago Board of Trade.” Senate, 68th Congress, 1st Session, Document 110.Google Scholar
Hendry, David F., and Morgan, Mary S.. 1997. The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holcombe, Randall G. 1996. “The Growth of the Federal Government in the 1920s.” Cato Journal 16 (2): 175–199.Google Scholar
Houthakker, Hendrik S. 2006. “Normal Backwardation.” In Hicks, J. R. and Wolfe, J. N., eds., Value, Capital & Growth. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, ch. 7.Google Scholar
Irwin, Scott H., Sanders, Dwight R., and Merrin, Robert P.. 2009. “Devil or Angel? The Role of Speculation in the Recent Commodity Price Boom (and Bust).” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41 (2): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, David S. 2007. “Populists Versus Theorists: Futures Markets and the Volatility of Prices.” Explorations in Economic History 44 (2): 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Bruce. N.d. “Creating Stanford’s Food Research Institute: Herbert Hoover, Alonzo Taylor, Carl Alsberg, J. S. Davis, and M. K. Bennet.” https://web.stanford.edu/group/FRI/fri/history/bruce.html. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2008. “The Construction of the Canonical History of Financial Economics.” History of Political Economy 40 (2): 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Judy. 1997. Statistical Visions in Time: A History of Time Series Analysis, 1662–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knittel, Christopher R., and Pindyck, Robert S.. 2016. “The Simple Economics of Commodity Price Speculation.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 8 (2): 85–110.Google Scholar
Levin, Office of Senator Carl. 2011. “Investigations Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Excessive Speculation and the New Positions Limit Rule.” Press release, https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/media/investigations-subcommittee-holds-hearing-on-excessive-speculation-and-the-new-positions-limit-rule. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina. 2012. “From Speculation to Regulation: Keynes and Primary Commodity Markets.” In Speculation and Regulation in Commodity Markets: The Keynesian Approach in Theory and Practice. MPRA Paper. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44131/p. 129, p. 3. Accessed 15 July 2018.Google Scholar
Markham, Jerry W. 1991a. “Federal Regulation of Margin in the Commodity Futures Industry—History and Theory.” Temp. LR 64: 59.Google Scholar
Markham, Jerry W. 1991b. “Manipulation of Commodity Futures Prices—The Unprosecutable Crime.” Yale J. on Reg. 8: 281.Google Scholar
Markham, Jerry W. 2002. A Financial History of the United States: From Christopher Columbus to the Robber Barons (1492–1900). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Markham, Jerry W. 2015. Law Enforcement and the History of Financial Market Manipulation. New York: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCalla, Alex, Castle, Emery, and Eidman, Vernon. 2010. “The AAEA: Ever Growing and Changing Research Challenges.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92 (2): 334–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Paul. 1919. “Evolution of the Present System of Organized Speculation.” The Oregon Countryman 12 (3): 12–16.Google Scholar
Mehl, Paul. 1932. Suggested Method for Controlling Large Speculative Lines in Chicago Wheat Futures. Washington, DC: Grain Futures Administration.Google Scholar
Mehl, Paul. 1933. Memo to Rodger Kaffman regarding Chart CF591, GFA Archive Series 3, Box104.Google Scholar
Mehl, Paul. 1934. “Trading in Futures and Price Fluctuations.” Journal Farm Economics 16: 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Paul. 1940. “Trading in Wheat and Corn Futures in Relation to Price Movements.” Journal of Farm Economics 22 (3): 601–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1991. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Choi, Jin Wook. 2015. “Agricultural Futures Markets.” In Malliaris, Anastasios G. and Ziemba, William T., eds., The World Scientific Handbook of Futures Markets. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company Pte Limited, pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzel, Todd E. 1981. “A New Look at Some Old Evidence: The Wheat Market Scandal of 1925.” Food Research Institute Studies 18 (1): 117–128.Google Scholar
Pirrong, Craig. 2010. “All Contangled Up.” Blog, https://streetwiseprofessor.com/all-contangled-up/. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta. 1997. “Political Dynamics of Derivative Securities Regulation, The.” Yale J. on Reg. 14: 279.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2011. “The USDA Graduate School: Government Training in Statistics and Economics, 1921–1945.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 33 (4): 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senate, United States. 2009. “Excessive Speculation in the Wheat Market.” Washington, DC: Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.Google Scholar
Shaars, Marvin A. 1972. “The Story of the Department of Agricultural Economics 1909–1972.” Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. https://aae.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AAEStory.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2018.Google Scholar
Stewart, Blair. 1949. An Analysis of Speculative Trading in Grain Futures. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Stock, James H., and Trebbi, Francesco. 2003. “Retrospectives Who Invented Instrumental Variable Regression?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (3): 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasury, US Department of the, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, US Securities and Exchange Commission, and US Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 2015. “Joint Staff Report: The U.S. Treasury Market on October 15, 2014.” Washington: the Authors.Google Scholar
United States, Secretary of Agriculture. 1926. Fluctuations in Wheat Futures. Letter from the secretary of agriculture transmitting, in response to Senate resolution no. 222, of June 9, 1926, a report of the Grain futures administration relative to the extreme fluctuation in the price of wheat futures during the early part of 1925. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States, Secretary of Agriculture. 1937. Rules and regulations of the secretary of agriculture under the Commodity exchange act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1922. “Factors Determining the Price of Potatoes in St. Paul and Minneapolis.” Technical Bulletin. Agricultural Experiment Station. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1933. “Price Relations between July and September Wheat Futures at Chicago since 1885.” Wheat Studies 6: 185–238.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1934a. “Price Relations between May and New-Crop Wheat Futures at Chicago since 1885.” Food Research Institute Wheat Studies 10: 183–228.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1934b. “A Random-Difference Series for Use in the Analysis of Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 29 (185): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1937. “[Past and Present Theory regarding Futures Trading]: Discussion.” Journal of Farm Economics 19 (1): 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1948. “Theory of the Inverse Carrying Charge in Futures Markets.” Journal of Farm Economics 30 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1953. “Price Supports and the Effectiveness of Hedging.” Journal of Farm Economics 35 (5): 811–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1958. “A Theory of Anticipatory Prices.” The American Economic Review 48 (2): 188–199.Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook. 1962. “New Concepts Concerning Futures Markets and Prices.” The American Economic Review 52 (3): 431–459.Google Scholar