Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:38:13.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAPABILITIES FOR THE MISERABLE; HAPPINESS FOR THE SATISFIED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2011

JOSÉ M. EDWARDS  and
SOPHIE PELLÉ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explain the process of diversification of normative economics by presenting the work of two authors—Tibor Scitovsky (1910–2002) and Amartya Sen (1933–). While these two authors first contributed to traditional welfare analysis from within, they were subsequently involved in the development of two different, and even opposed, programs: the economics of happiness; and the capability approach. They focused on different concepts of well-being: the “joy” of satisfied consumers for Scitovsky; and the “capabilities” of deprived individuals for Sen. In imposing new theoretical frameworks and applications, as well as new concepts of well-being, which are measureable, the capability approach and the economics of happiness represent two major attempts to renew normative economic analysis.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 335 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alkire, Sabina. 2002. Valuing Freedom. Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. [1951] 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. Second edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Assidon, Elsa. 2000. “L’émergence d’un nouveau domaine: l’économie du développement.” In Béraud, A. and Faccarello, G., eds., Nouvelle Histoire de la Pensée Économique. Volume 3. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 487–515.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. 1970. “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2 (3): 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. 1999. “Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. 2001. “The Strange Disappearance of Welfare Economics.” Kyklos 54 (2): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 2009. “Robbins and Welfare Economics: A Reappraisal.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4): 474–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Duflo, Esther. 2007. “The Economic Lives of the Poor.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 141–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumol, William J. 1965. Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State. Second edition. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; G. Bell.Google Scholar
Bergson, Abram. 1938. “A Reformulation of Certain aspects of Welfare Economics.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 52 (2): 310–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackorby, Charles, and Donaldson, David. 1991. “Adult Equivalence Scales, Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being, and Applied Welfare Economics.” In Elster, J. and Roemer, J., eds., Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvin, Jean-Michel, and Farvaque, Nicolas. 2008. Amartya Sen. Une politique de la liberté. Paris: Michalon.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, François, and Chakravarty, Satya R.. 2002. “Multidimensional Poverty Orderings.” DELTA Working Paper, 2002–22.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, François, and Chakravarty, Satya R.. 2003. “The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty.” Journal of Economic Inequality 1 (1): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Luigino, and Luigi Porta, Pier. 2007. Handbook on the Economics of Happiness. Cheltenham UK; Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappero-Martinetti, Enrica. 2000. “A Multidimensional Assessment of Well-Being Based on Sen’s Functioning Approach.” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108 (2): 207–239.Google Scholar
Clark, Andrew E., Frijters, Paul, and Shields, Michael A.. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comim, Falvio, Qizilbash, Mozaffar, and Alkire, Sabina. 2008. The Capability Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, John B. 2007. “The Turn in Economics and the Turn in Economic Methodology.” Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3): 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoine, Lucie. 2009. “L’Économie du Bonheur. Quel Intérêt pour les Politiques Publiques?” Revue Économique 60 (4): 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakopoulos, Stavros A. 2010. “The Neglect of Comparison Income: An Historical Perspective.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. First published on: 31 March 2010 (iFirst). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672560903552579Google Scholar
Duesenberry, James S. 1949. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duflo, Esther. 2006. “Field Experiments in Development Economics.” In Blundell, R., Newey, W. K., and Persson, T., eds., Advances in Economics and Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. “What is Equality?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3): 185–246, 283–345.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence.” In Easterlin, R., ed., Happiness in Economics. Cheltenham UK; Northampton MA: Edward Elgar, 2002, pp. 5–41.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. 2004. The Reluctant Economist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, José M. 2009. “Joyful Economists: Remarks on the History of Economics and Psychology from the Happiness Studies Perspective.” PhD thesis, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00486771.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, and Roemer, John, eds. 1991. Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccarello, Gilbert. 2000. “La Période Contemporaine, Introduction.” In Béraud, A. and Faccarello, G., eds., Nouvelle Histoire de la Pensée Économique. Volume 3. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 335–337.Google Scholar
Foley, Duncan. 1967. “Resource Allocation and the Public Sector.” Yale Economic Essays 7: 43–98.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1989. “Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life.” The American Economic Review 79 (2): 80–85.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1958. The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1967. The New Industrial State. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Graaff, John de V. 1957. Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hammond, Peter J. 1977. “Dual Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility and the Welfare Economics of Income Distribution.” Journal of Public Economics 7 (1): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Peter J. 1991. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Why and How they Are and Should Be Made.” In Elster, J. and Roemer, J., eds., Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2009. “The Positive-Normative Dichotomy and Economics.” In Mäki, U., ed., Philosophy of Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 63 (4): 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” The Economic Journal 49 (196): 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1977. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
HirschmanAlbert, O. Albert, O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kalai, Ehud. 1977. “Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Problems.” Econometrica 45 (7): 1623–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1939. “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1989. “A Conversation with Amartya Sen.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (1): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe. 1972. Justice et Équité. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Lange, Oskar. 1942. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics.” Econometrica 10 (3/4): 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R. 1980. “Human Satisfactions and Public Policy.” The Economic Journal 90 (3): 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelli, Sara. 2008. “Operationalising Sen’s Capability Approach: The Influence of the Selected Technique.” In Comim, Falvio, Qizilbash, Mozaffar, and Alkire, Sabina, eds., The Capability Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–323.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. 1954. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour.” The Manchester School 22 (2): 139–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Ian M. 1950. A Critique of Welfare Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Roger. 2000. “The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry’s Contribution to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Economic Issues 34 (3): 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, Ezra J. 1960. “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939–59.” The Economic Journal 70 (278): 197–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, Ezra J. 1967. The Costs of Economic Growth. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. 2002. “Is There Progress in Normative Economics?” In Boehm, Stephen, Gehrke, Christian, Kurz, Heinz D., and Sturn, Richard, eds., Is There Progress in Economics? Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 145–170.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. 2006. “Value Judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics.” Economica 73 (290): 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1988. “Nature, Function, and Capability: Aristote on Political Distribution.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1 (supl. vol.): 145–184.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1992. “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism.” Political Theory 20 (2): 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellé, Sophie. 2009. “Amartya K. Sen ou la Possibilité d’une Éthique Rationnelle.” PhD thesis, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur C. 1951. “Some Aspects of Welfare Economics.” The American Economic Review 41 (3): 287–302.Google Scholar
Pressman, Steven, and Summerfield, Gale. 2000. “The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen.” Review of Political Economy 12 (1): 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 1996. “Capabilities, Well-being and Human Development: A Survey.” The Journal of Development Studies 33 (2): 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qizilbash, Mozaffar. 2002. “A Note on the Measurement of Poverty and Vulnerability in the South African Context.” Journal of International Development 14 (6): 757–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment.” The Economic Journal 48 (192): 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. “The Capability Approach: a Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Developement 6 (3): 30–49.Google Scholar
Robeyns, Ingrid. 2008. “Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (3): 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostow, Walt W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth, a Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggeri Laderchi, Caterina. 1997. “Poverty and its Many Dimensions: The Role of Income as an Indicator.” Oxford Development Studies 25 (3): 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scarantino, Andrea. 2009. “On the Role of Values in Economic Science: Robbins and His Critics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4): 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokkaert, Erik, and Van Otegem, Luc. 1990. “Sen’s Concept of Living Standard Applied to the Belgian Unemployed.” Recherches Économiques de Louvain 56: 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1941. “A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics.” The Review of Economic Studies 9 (1): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1951. “The State of Welfare Economics.” The American Economic Review 4 (3): 303–315.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1952. Welfare and Competition; The Economics of a Fully Employed Economy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1954. “Two Concepts of External Economies.” The Journal of Political Economy 62 (2): 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1962. “On the Principle of Consumer’s Sovereignty.” The American Economic Review 52 (2): 262–268.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1973. “Notes on the Producer Society.” De Economist 121 (3): 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scitovsky, Tibor. 1976. The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1967. “The Nature and Classes of Prescriptive Judgments.” Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66): 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. London: Olivier & Boyd.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1973. On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4): 317–344.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1979. “Equality of What?” In The Tanner Lecture on Human Value. Stanford University. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1982. “Right and Agency.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (1): 3–39.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1985a. “Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984.” The Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1985b. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 1993. “Well-being and Capability.” In Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., eds., The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K, and Williams, Bernard. 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E., Sen, Amartya K., and Fitoussi, Jean-Paul. 2009. “Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.” http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.Google Scholar
Varian, Hal R. 1974. “Equity, Envy, and Efficiency.” Journal of Economic Theory 9 (1): 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar