Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:00:41.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What the Progressives Had in Common

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2011

Glen Gendzel
Glen Gendzel*
Affiliation:
San Jose State University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Professor Benjamin Parke De Witt of New York University sat down to write the first history of the progressive movement in 1915, he promised “to give form and definiteness to a movement which is, in the minds of many, confused and chaotic.” Apparently it was a fool's errand, because confusion and chaos continued to plague historians of early twentieth-century reform long after Professor De Witt laid his pen to rest. The maddening variety of reform and reformers in the early twentieth century has perpetually confounded historians' efforts to identify what, if anything, the progressives had in common. Back in the 1950s, Richard Hofstadter charitably allowed that progressives were “of two minds on many issues,” whereas Arthur Link argued that “the progressive movement never really existed” because it pursued so many “contradictory objectives.” In the 1960s, Robert Wiebe concluded that the progressives, if they constituted a movement at all, showed “little regard for consistency.” In the 1970s, Peter Filene wrote an “obituary” for progressivism by reasserting Link's claim that the movement had “never existed” because it was so divided and diffuse. In the 1980s, Daniel Rodgers tried to recast the “ideologically fluid” progressive movement as a pastiche of vaguely related rhetorical styles. By the 1990s, so many competing characterizations of progressivism had emerged that Alan Dawley wondered if “they merely cancel each other out.” In 2002, Glenda Elizabeth Gilmore declared emphatically that “historians cannot agree” on progressivism. In 2010, Walter Nugent admitted that “the movement's core theme has been hard to pin down” because progressivism had “many concerns” and “included a wide range of persons and groups.”

Type
Forum: La Follette's Wisconsin in Perspective
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 331 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 De Witt, Benjamin Parke, The Progressive Movement: A Non-Partisan, Comprehensive Discussion of Current Tendencies in American Politics (1915; Seattle, 1968)Google Scholar, viii.

2 Hofstadter, Richard, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (New York, 1955), 134Google Scholar; Link, Arthur S., “What Happened to the Progressive Movement in the 1920s?” American Historical Review 64 (June 1959): 836CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967), 144Google Scholar; Filene, Peter G., “An Obituary for ‘The Progressive Movement,’” American Quarterly 22 (Spring 1970): 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Rodgers, Daniel, “In Search of Progressivism,” Reviews in American History 10 (Dec. 1982): 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dawley, Alan, Struggles for Justice: Social Responsibility and the Liberal State (Cambridge, MA, 1991)Google Scholar, 128.

5 Gilmore, Glenda Elizabeth, “Introduction: Responding to the Challenges of the Progressive Era,” in Who Were the Progressives?, ed. Gilmore (Boston, 2002), 18Google Scholar; Nugent, Walter, Progressivism: A Very Short Introduction (New York, 2010), 3–4Google Scholar.

6 Link, Arthur S. and McCormick, Richard L., Progressivism (Arlington Heights, IL, 1983), 2Google Scholar; Flanagan, Maureen A., America Reformed: Progressives and Progressivisms, 1890s–1920s (New York, 2007)Google Scholar; McGerr, Michael E., A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870-1920 (New York, 2003)Google Scholar, 73.

7 See, for example, Frankel, Noralee and Dye, Nancy S., eds., Gender, Class, Race, and Reform in the Progressive Era (Lexington, KY, 1991)Google Scholar; and Deverell, William and Sitton, Tom, eds., California Progressivism Revisited (Berkeley, 1994)Google Scholar.

8 Goldman, Eric F., Rendezvous With Destiny: A History of Modern American Reform (New York, 1956), 66–81Google Scholar; Nasaw, David, “Gilded Age Gospels” in Ruling America: A History of Wealth and Power in a Democracy, ed. Fraser, Steve and Gerstle, Gary (Cambridge, MA, 2005), 123–48Google Scholar. See also McCloskey, Robert Green, American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise, 1865–1910 (Cambridge, MA, 1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Sumner, William Graham, “The Absurd Effort to Make the World Over,” Forum 17 (Mar. 1894): 92–102Google Scholar.

10 Chambers, John Whiteclay II, The Tyranny of Change: America in the Progressive Era, 1890–1920, 3rd ed. (New Brunswick, NJ, 2000), 275–80Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., 150–55; Flanagan, America Reformed, 131–33; Baker, Paula, “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780-1920,” American Historical Review 89 (June 1984): 620–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Rodgers, Daniel T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA, 1998), 33–111Google Scholar; Dawley, Struggles for Justice, 133–138.

13 Theodore Roosevelt, “Reform Through Social Work,” McClure's, Mar. 1901, 454.

14 Lippmann, Walter, Drift and Mastery: An Attempt to Diagnose Our Current Unrest (New York, 1914)Google Scholar, 267.

15 Ely, Richard T., Ground Under Our Feet: An Autobiography (New York, 1938)Google Scholar, 136.

16 Eisenach, Eldon, The Lost Promise of Progressivism (Lawrence, KS, 1994), 138–86Google Scholar. See also West, Thomas G., “Progressivism and the Transformation of American Government” in The Progressive Revolution in Politics and Political Science: Transforming the American Regime, eds. Marini, John A. and Masugi, Ken (Lanham, MD, 2005), 13–34Google Scholar.

17 Dawley, Struggles for Justice, 170. See also Eisenach, Lost Promise of Progressivism, 150–52.

18 Lears, Jackson, Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877–1920 (New York, 2009)Google Scholar, 200, 310. The classic statement of the anticorruptionist animus behind progressivism remains McCormick, Richard L., “The Discovery that Business Corrupts Politics: A Reappraisal of the Origins of Progressivism,” American Historical Review 86 (Apr. 1981): 247–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Patten, Simon N., “The Effect of the Consumption of Wealth on the Economic Welfare of Society,” in Science Economic Discussion (New York, 1886), 135Google Scholar; Follett, Mary P., The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government (New York, 1918), 48–49Google Scholar; Ross, Edward Alsworth, Social Control: A Survey of the Foundations of Order (New York, 1901)Google Scholar, 99. For another early statement in favor of state activism, see Adams, Henry Carter, “Relation of the State to Industrial Action,” Publications of the American Economic Association 1 (Jan. 1887): 7–85Google Scholar. On the weakness of the preprogressive American state, see Skowronek, Stephen, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (New York, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Howe, Frederic C., The Confessions of a Reformer (1925; Chicago, 1967)Google Scholar, 10; Lubove, Roy, “Frederick C. Howe and the Quest for Community in America,” The Historian 39 (Feb. 1977): 270–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Addams, Jane, Twenty Years at Hull-House (New York, 1910)Google Scholar, 368. See also Quandt, Jean B., From the Small Town to the Great Community: The Social Thought of Progressive Intellectuals (New Brunswick, NJ, 1970)Google Scholar.

22 Abbott, Lyman, Reminiscences (New York, 1915), 440Google Scholar; Dewey, John, “The Ethics of Democracy” in John Dewey: The Early Works, 1882–1898 (Carbondale, IL, 1967–72)Google Scholar, 1:231.

23 Addams, Jane, “Henry Demarest Lloyd: His Passion for the Better Social Order,” The Commons 9 (Jan. 1904)Google Scholar: 20. Addams was paraphrasing (without attribution) John Morley, the British liberal politician and philosopher, who had written: “Progress is not automatic… . The world only grows better … because people wish that it should, and take the right steps to make it better.” Morley, John, On Compromise (London, 1886)Google Scholar, 210.

24 Croly, Herbert, The Promise of American Life (New York, 1909)Google Scholar; Levy, David W., Herbert Croly of The New Republic: The Life and Thought of an American Progressive (Princeton, 1985)Google Scholar.

25 Maxwell, Robert S., La Follette and the Rise of the Progressives in Wisconsin (1956; New York, 1973), 40–55Google Scholar, 74–86; Thelen, David P., Robert M. La Follette and the Insurgent Spirit (Boston, 1976), 32–51Google Scholar; C. Unger, Nancy, Fighting Bob La Follette: The Righteous Reformer (Chapel Hill, 2000), 120–38Google Scholar.

26 Nye, Russell B., Midwestern Progressive Politics: A Historical Study of Its Origins and Development, 1870–1958 (New York, 1959)Google Scholar, 185, 187; La Follette, Robert M., La Follette's Autobiography: A Personal Narrative of Political Experiences (Madison, WI, 1913)Google Scholar, 759.

27 Jørn Brøndal, “The Quest for a New Political Order: Robert M. La Follette and the Genesis of the Direct Primary in Wisconsin, 1891–1904” (MA thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1990); Brett Flehinger, “‘Public Interest’: Robert M. La Follette and the Economics of Democratic Progressivism” (PhD diss., Harvard University, 1997); La Follette quoted in Nye, Midwestern Progressive Politics, 189.

28 Unger, Fighting Bob La Follette, 239–62; La Follette in Congressional Record, 65th Cong., 1st sess. (Apr. 5, 1917), 371–72.

29 1See, for example, Sklar, Kathryn Kish, Florence Kelley and the Nation's Work (New Haven, 1995)Google Scholar.

30 Chace, James, 1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft and Debs—The Election that Changed the Country (New York, 2004), 191–97Google Scholar.