Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:24:36.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Are the Costs of “Civilization” and Sovereignty?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2021

Julie L. Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 340 - 343
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (SHGAPE)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Denson, Andrew, Demanding the Cherokee Nation: Indian Autonomy and American Culture, 1830–1900 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2015), 89–120.Google Scholar

2 McLoughlin, William G., After the Trail of Tears: The Cherokees’ Struggle for Sovereignty, 1839–1880, 1st ed. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994), 219–40.Google Scholar

3 Reed, Julie L., Serving the Nation: Cherokee Sovereignty and Social Welfare, 1800–1907 (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2016).Google Scholar

4 Denson, Demanding the Cherokee Nation, 113.

5 Ezra Rosser, “The Nature of Representation: The Cherokee Right to a Congressional Delegate,” Boston University Public Interest Law Journal (2005), https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/473 (accessed July 16, 2020).

6 Denson, Demanding the Cherokee Nation.

7 “Timber Monopoly and the Revenue,” Cherokee Advocate, Aug. 24, 1881; “Report of the Dawes Commission Analyzed and Statement Sharply Controverted,” Cherokee Advocate, Feb. 20, 1895; “Our Western Lands,” Cherokee Advocate, Mar. 24, 1882; “Multiple News Items,” Cherokee Advocate, July 27, 1881.

8 “Timber Monopoly and the Revenue.”

9 “From the Globe Democrat,” Cherokee Advocate, Jan. 6, 1882.

10 Merrill Edwards Gates, Land and Law as Agents in Educating Indians: An Address Delivered Before the American Social Science Association at Saratoga, N.Y., Sept. 11th, 1885 (1885).

11 Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1898), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/376/ (accessed July 16, 2020).

12 Leeds, Stacy L., “Defeat or Mixed Blessing—Tribal Sovereignty and the State of Sequoyah,” Tulsa Law Review 43:1 (Fall 2007): 5–16; “State of Sequoyah,” https://www.loc.gov/item/2013592417/ (accessed July 16, 2020).Google Scholar

13 McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/591/18-9526/ (accessed July 16, 2020).