Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:30:12.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Narrowing of Vision: Hardy L. Brian and the Fate of Louisiana Populism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2010

Joel Sipress
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin—Superior

Abstract

In the 1890s, Hardy L. Brian was among Louisiana's leading Populists. He was a key founder of the Louisiana People's Party and served as state party secretary and editor of the organization's weekly newspaper. Son of a prominent agrarian dissident from the Louisiana piney woods, Brian believed deeply in the power of an aroused populace to bring fundamental changes to American political and economic life. Over time, however, he abandoned social movement organizing in favor of conventional party politics. The climax of this journey came in 1896, when Brian joined fellow delegates to the Populist national convention to give the People's Party presidential nomination to Democratic candidate William Jennings Bryan. The Bryan nomination cost the Populists their independent political identity and precipitated a collapse of their party organization. Hardy L. Brian's journey from agrarian rebel to conventional reform politician reflects a loss of faith in the power of the Populist vision. While he never abandoned the goal of fundamental change, Brian lost faith in the power of this goal to inspire and arouse. Instead, he embraced the logic of conventional party politics, and upon that logic the Populist vision foundered.

Type
Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hair, William Ivy, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest: Louisiana Politics, 1877-1900 (Baton Rouge, 1969), 217Google Scholar; Colfax (LA) Chronicle, Oct. 10, 1891Google Scholar; Daily Picayune (New Orleans), Oct. 3, 1891Google Scholar; Organization, Platform and Address of the People's Party,” Brian, Hardy L. Papers, Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Collections, Louisiana State UniversityGoogle Scholar.

2 “Organization, Platform and Address of the People's Party”; The address is quoted in part in , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 218–19Google Scholar. The address was co-written with Bryant W. Bailey of Winn Parish. Price, John Milton, “Populism in Winn Parish” (MA thesis, Louisiana State University, 1969), 57Google Scholar.

4 Durden, Robert F., The Climax of Populism: The Election of 1896 (Lexington, KY, 1965), vii, ixGoogle Scholar; Sanders, Elizabeth, Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877-1917 (Chicago, 1999), 14Google Scholar; Kazin, Michael, A Godly Hero: The Life of William Jennings Bryan (New York, 2006)Google Scholar.

5 Goodwyn, Lawrence, Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America (New York, 1976).Google Scholar

6 Goodwyn's insistence upon the centrality of the Alliance cooperative movement in the rise of Populism has been widely criticized by historians who see little evidence of such a connection outside of Texas, where Goodwyn conducted his most detailed and exhaustive research. See, for instance, Wright, James, “A Populist Ideology,” Reviews in American History 6 (Sept. 1978): 365–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cherny, Robert W., “Lawrence Goodwyn and Nebraska Populism: A Review Essay,” Great Plains Quarterly 1 (Summer 1981): 181–94Google Scholar; Parsons, Stanley B., et al., “The Role of Cooperatives in the Development of the Movement Culture of Populism,” journal of American History 69 (Mar. 1983): 866–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar. While Goodwyn's model may have limited relevance to the Plains states, studies such as McMath, Robert C. Jr, ' Populist Vanguard: A History of the Southern Farmers' Alliance (Chapel Hill, 1975)Google Scholar suggest that Goodwyn's approach does apply more broadly to southern Populism.

7 At the time of secession, Big Creek was contained within the Mill Creek precinct of Rapides Parish, which voted unanimously against secessionists in the January 1861 election for delegates to the state secession convention; Constitutional (Alexandria, LA), Jan. 12, 1861Google Scholar. Big Creek resident William H. Willett organized a Unionist company in 1864 that was incorporated into the First Battalion, Louisiana Cavalry Scouts. Haynes, D. E., A Thrilling Narrative of the Sufferings of Union Refugees and the Massacre of the Martyrs of Liberty of Western Louisiana (Washington, 1866), 47Google Scholar; Compiled Service Records of Volunteer Union Soldiers Who Served in Organisations from Louisiana, National Archives Microfilm, roll 11; “Letter from Big Creek,” Caucasian (Alexandria, LA.), June 6, 1874Google Scholar.

8 Obiruary of Brian, Benjamin Franklin, Louisiana Populist, Nov. 6, 1896Google Scholar; Federal Manuscript Census, 1870, Grant Parish, Agricultural Schedule; Federal Manuscript Census, 1880, Grant Parish, Agricultural Schedule; Chronicle, Sept. 30, Oct. 28, 1876Google Scholar; Oct. 26, Nov. 9, 1878; Dec. 6, 1879; Apr. 12, May 3, 1884; Apr. 7, May 5, 1888; Sept. 12, 1891. Brian received significant black support in his 1876, 1878, 1879, and 1888 campaigns. In 1884, the Grant Parish Republican Party endorsed his Democratic opponent. (Black voters, who made up about a third of the parish's electorate, were able to vote relatively freely and fairly in Grant until disfranchisement in the late 1890s.) In 1878, Brian ran as a member of an independent “green-back” slate committed to inflationary monetary reform.

9 , Price, “Populism in Winn Parish,” 77Google Scholar; Woodward, C. Vann, Origins of the New South, 1877-1913 (Baton Rouge, 1951), 191Google Scholar. For the early history of the Louisiana Farmers' Union, see , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 142–52Google Scholar.

10 Chronicle, Mar. 5, June 4, 1887Google Scholar; July 13, 1889. For a detailed analysis of the cotton economy of one piney woods Louisiana parish, see Sipress, Joel M., “The Triumph of Reaction: Political Struggle in a New South Community, 1865-1898” (PhD diss., University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1993), 159–70, 232-37Google Scholar.

11 Chronicle, June 4, July 16, 1887Google Scholar; Mar. 17, 1888, Jan. 12, Sept. 14, 1889; Feb. 22, 1890; Feb. 13, 1892; “Charter and By-Laws of the Winn Parish Cooperative Association,” Hardy L. Brian Papers.

12 Constitution and By-Laws of the Farmers' Union of the State of Louisiana,” Ruston, 1888Google Scholar, Sidney Seth Tarum Family Papers, Special Collections, Manuscripts and Archives Department, Prescott Memorial Library, Louisiana Tech University; “Ceremonies and Rituals of the Louisiana Farmers' Union,” Longino Manuscripts, Archives Microfilm No. 226, Reel 4, Cammie G. Henry Research Center, Watson Library, Northwestern State University of Louisiana; Chronicle, July 13, 1889Google Scholar. For a discussion of the role of women in the Farmers' Alliance, see Jeffrey, Julie Roy, “Women in the Southern Farmers' Alliance: A Reconstruction of the Role and Status of Women in the Late Nineteenth-Century South,” Feminist Studies 3 (Fall 1975): 7291CrossRefGoogle Scholar. McMath discusses the role of the Farmers' Alliance as a social institution in Populist Vanguard, 64-76.

13 Chronicle, Oct. 12, 1889Google Scholar; Aug. 16, 1890; Southern Sentinel (Winnfield, LA), Sept. 16, 1887Google Scholar; “Charter and By-Laws of the Winn Parish Cooperative Association”; , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 204-05, 209–10Google Scholar.

14 Letter of Dunn, A. J., Chronicle, Sept. 6, 1890Google Scholar. For a discussion of the subtreasury plan its political significance, see , Goodwyn, Democratic Promise, 166–72Google Scholar.

15 Daniel, Lucia Elizabeth, “The Louisiana People's Party,” Louisiana Historical Quarterly 26 (Oct. 1943): 1077Google Scholar; Chronicle, Aug. 23, Aug. 30, Sept. 20, Oct. 4, 1890Google Scholar; Daily Advocate (Baton Rouge), Oct. 5, 1890Google Scholar.

16 , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 207.Google Scholar

17 Journal of the Knights of Labor, May 21, 1891Google Scholar; Chronicle, July 11, 1891Google Scholar; Cincinnati Enquirer, May 18, 1891Google Scholar; “Organization, Platform and Address of the People's Party.”

18 Resolutions of the Montgomery Farmers' Union, Chronicle, June 27, 1891Google Scholar; “Organization, Platform and Address of the People's Party”; Letter of LaCroix, S. W., Chronicle, Sept. 12, 1891Google Scholar.

19 , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 201–04.Google Scholar

20 Chronicle, Dec. 12, 1891Google Scholar; Feb. 6, 1892; Louisiana Populist, July 5, 1895Google Scholar; Chronicle, Dec. 12, 1891Google Scholar; Mar. 5, Apr. 2, 1892.

21 Times-Democrat (New Orleans), Feb. 18-19, 1892Google Scholar. , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 196–97Google Scholar , 222-23. Many historians have interpreted Populist assertions of an identity of interests between black and white as a challenge to the South's racial orthodoxy. Conservative paternalists, however, also argued that the interests of black and white were identical. In both cases, the assertion of an identity of interests was used to argue that blacks should defer political power to whites.

22 , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 225–26Google Scholar. For election results, see , Daniel, “The Louisiana People's Party,” 1126–29Google Scholar. Hair attributes Tannehill's poor showing in New Orleans, in part, to electoral fraud. The Populists received 9,792 votes in the 1892 gubernatorial election. In the fall of 1892, the Populists ran candidates in four of Louisiana's six congressional districts. The Populist congressional candidates received a total of 14,634 votes representing 18 percent of the vote cast in the four districts.

23 Chronicle, Nov. 19, 1892Google Scholar; Watkins, James L., King Cotton (New York, 1908), 31Google Scholar; Hammond, Matthew Brown, The Cotton Kingdom: An Essay in American Economic History (New York, 1897), 169Google Scholar; Louisiana Populist, Oct. 5, Nov. 9, 1894Google Scholar.

24 Chronicle, Feb. 13, 1892Google Scholar; Dec. 17, Dec. 24, 1892; Sept. 30, 1893.

25 Louisiana Democrat, Aug. 24, Sept. 7, 1894Google Scholar; Mail (Montgomery, LA), July 7, 1894Google Scholar.

26 For a good brief discussion of the silver issue, see Clanton, Gene, Congressional Populism and the Crisis of the 1890s (Lawrence, KS, 1998), 5558Google Scholar. See also Hicks, John D., The Populist Revolt: A History of the Farmers' Alliance and People's Party (Minneapolis, 1931), 301–20Google Scholar. At times, even scholars sympathetic to the free-silver cause downplay the real material significance of the issue. In his sympathetic biography of William Jennings Bryan, for instance, Michael Kazin stresses the symbolic power of the silver issue for farmers ill at ease with the abstractions of modern finance; , Kazin, A Godly Hero, 50Google Scholar.

21 Louisiana Populist, Aug. 31, Oct. 19, 1894Google Scholar; Chronicle, Oct. 27, 1894Google Scholar.

28 Louisiana Populist, Aug. 24, Aug. 31, 1894.

29 , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 242Google Scholar. Louisiana election results in , Daniel, “The Louisiana People's Party,” 1128–31Google Scholar.

30 Louisiana Populist, Mar. 8, Sept. 13, 1895Google Scholar; Dec. 7, 1894; June 7, Mar. 1, 1895; Jan. 1, 1896.

31 , Daniel, “The Louisiana People's Party,” 1134–36Google Scholar. For an account of the 1896 Louisiana state elections, see , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 248–67Google Scholar. Hair demonstrates persuasively that fraudulent black ballots in a dozen plantation parishes provided the Democratic state ticket with its margin of victory.

32 Hunt, James L., Marion Butler and American Populism (Chapel Hill, 2003), 8384Google Scholar. like Brian, Marion Buder was a veteran Populist with deep roots in the agrarian movement. Butler worked his way up through the ranks of agrarian politics, beginning as the lecturer and later the president of his local county Farmers' Alliance. For an analysis of national Populist leaders' use of free silver as a “wedge” issue, see , Durden, The Climax of Populism, 613Google Scholar.

33 , Durden, The Climax of Populism, 1214Google Scholar; , Goodwyn, Democratic Promise, 471–72Google Scholar.

34 Hair, , Bourbonism and Agrarian Protest, 269Google Scholar; Louisiana Populist, Jan. 3, 1896Google Scholar; Chronicle, June 13, June 20, 1896Google Scholar.

35 For accounts of Bryan's early political career and rise to prominence, see: , Kazin, A Godly Hero;Google ScholarAshby, LeRoy, William Jennings Bryan: Champion of Democracy (Boston, 1987)Google Scholar; Cherny, Robert W., A Righteous Cause: The Use of William Jennings Bryan (Boston, 1985)Google Scholar; and Koenig, Louis W., Bryan: A Political Biography of William Jennings Bryan (New York, 1971)Google Scholar. Lawrence Goodwyn provides a critical view of Nebraska “fusion” politics and Bryan's role in the agrarian movement in Democratic Promise, 388-401. For a discussion of evolving scholarly views of Bryan, see Cherny, Robert W., “William Jennings Bryan and the Historians,” Nebraska Histoiy 77 (Fall/Winter 1996): 184–93Google Scholar.

36 , Kazin, A Godly Hero, 36Google Scholar, 41-42; , Koenig, Bryan, 109Google Scholar, 116, 126-27.

37 , Durden, The Climax of Populism, 2330Google Scholar; , Goodwyn, Democratic Promise, 474–79Google Scholar.

38 Louisiana Populist, July 17, July 24, 1896.Google Scholar

39 , Durden, The Climax of Populism, 3349Google Scholar; , Goodwyn, Democratic Promise, 479–92Google Scholar.

40 Louisiana Populist, July 31, Aug. 7, 1896Google Scholar. The sixteen-member Louisiana delegation was entitled to cast thirty-two votes at the St. Louis convention. The one delegate who failed to vote for Bryan abstained on the presidential ballot.

41 Louisiana Populist, Aug. 14, Aug. 21, Sept. 4, Oct. 16, Nov. 6, Nov. 13, 1896Google Scholar; , Daniel, “The Louisiana People's Party,” 1140Google Scholar.

42 “Read, Reflect, Act,” Populist broadsheet microfilmed with the Louisiana Populist following the issue of Feb. 19, 1897Google Scholar; Louisiana Populist, Nov. 11, Nov. 18, 1898Google Scholar.

43 Winn Parish Enterprise, Sept. 29, 1949Google Scholar; Winnfield News-American, Sept. 30, 1949Google Scholar.

44 The members of the Louisiana delegation to St. Louis convention are listed in the Louisiana Populist, July 31, 1896Google Scholar. Of the sixteen members of the delegation, at least seven can be positively determined to have been active in the Louisiana Farmers' Union. One additional delegate, J. V. Lagman of New Orleans, though not a Farmers' Union activist, was a veteran Populist who had attended the founding convention of the Louisiana People's Party in 1891. The delegation did include at two relatively recent converts to Populism. According to Hardy Brian, one of these recent converts, Monroe newspaper editor A. A. Gunby, was the most ardent “middle-of-the-roader” in the delegation; Louisiana Populist, Aug. 7, 1896Google Scholar. The sources consulted in compiling this portrait of the delegation include the Louisiana Populist, the Chronicle, , Hair, Bourbonism and Agrarian ProtestGoogle Scholar, and “Charter and By-Laws of the Winn Parish Cooperative Association.”

45 Cited in Korstand, Robert and Lichtenstein, Nelson, “Opportunities Found and Lost: Labor, Radicals, and the Early Civil Rights Movement,” journal of American History 75 (Dec. 1988): 811.Google Scholar