Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:01:25.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lost World of Gilded Age Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2010

Worth Robert Miller
Worth Robert Miller
Affiliation:
Southwest Missouri State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rambunctious world of Gilded Age politics, with its boisterous partisan rallies and three-hour long declamations on the finer points of tariff schedules and monetary policy, passed from the scene of American politics rather abruptly about a century ago. Despite its superficial similarities with politics today — sex scandals, corporate influence, and partisan gridlock in Washington — the spirit and substance of Gilded Age politics was quite different from political discourse today. Politics was a national obsession to nineteenth century Americans. Partisanship was open and vigorous because common people believed the issues were important and political parties represented divergent viewpoints. Men (and in a few places women) of every ethnic and racial background, and from every walk of life, overwhelmingly participated in America's democratic experiment. This made Gilded Age politicians some of the greatest heroes and villains of the era.

Type
Essays
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 2002 , pp. 49 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Burnham, Walter Dean, “The Appearance and Disappearance of the American Voter,” in Electoral Participation: A Comparative Analysis, ed., Rose, Richard (Beverly Hills, 1980): 44–46Google Scholar; McCormick, Richard L., “Public Life in Industrial America, 1877–1917,” in The New American History, ed., Foner, Eric (Philadelphia, 1990): 95–96.Google Scholar

2 Twain, Mark and Warner, Charles Dudley, The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today (Hartford, 1873).Google Scholar

3 Adams, Henry, The Education of Henry Adams: An Autobiography (Boston, 1918), 294CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baldwin, Leland D., ed., The Flavor of the Past: Readings in American Social and Political Portraiture (New York, 1968), 162.Google Scholar

4 Josephson, Matthew, The Politicos, 1865–1896 (New York, 1938)Google Scholar; Parrington, Vemon Louis, Main Currents in American Thought, vol. Ill, The Beginnings of Critical Realism in America, 1860–1920 (New York, 1930), 23.Google Scholar

5 Usable modem surveys of Gilded Age politics include Morgan, H. Wayne, From Hayes to McKinley: National Party Politics, 1877–1896 (Syracuse, 1969)Google Scholar; Keller, Morton, Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America (Cambridge, MA, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cherny, Robert W., American Politics in the Gilded Age: 1868–1900 (Wheeling, IL, 1997).Google Scholar

6 McCormick, Richard L., The Party Periodanti Public Policy: American Politics f rom the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era (New York, 1986), 200–02, 207, 213Google Scholar; Salisbury, Robert S., “The Republican Party and Positive Government: 1860–1890,” Mid-America 68 (January 1986): 17–18Google Scholar; Cherny, , American Politics in the Gilded Age, 13.Google Scholar

7 Calhoun, Charles W., “Late Nineteenth-Century Politics Revisited,” History Teacher 27 (1997): 333Google Scholar; Williams, R. Hal, “The Politics of the Gilded Age,” in American Political History: Essays on the State of the Discipline, eds., Marszalek, John F. and Miscamble, Wilson D. (Notre Dame, IN, 1997): 110–13Google Scholar; BinghamPowell, G. Jr., “Voting Turnout in Thirty Democracies: Partisan, Legal, and Socio-Economie Influences,” in Rose, Electoral Participation, 5–34.Google Scholar

8 Williams, , “The Politics of the Gilded Age,” 114Google Scholar; Kelley, Robert, “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” in Democrats and the American Idea: A Bicentennial Appraisal, ed., Kovler, Peter B. (Washington, DC, 1992): 148.Google Scholar

9 Kelley, , “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” 147–48.Google Scholar Also see Bensel, Richard Franklin, Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877 (New York, 1990).Google Scholar

10 Cherny, , American Politics in the Gilded Age, 26 and 108Google Scholar; McCormick, “Public Life in Industrial America, 1877–1917,” in Foner, , The New American History, 98Google Scholar; Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 340Google Scholar; Keller, , Affairs of State, 456.Google Scholar For disfranchisement and segregation, see Kousser, J. Morgan, The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910 (New Haven, 1974)Google Scholar and Woodward, C. Vann, The Strange Career of Jim Crow (New York, 1974)Google Scholar, respectively.

11 Chemy, , American Politics in the Gilded Age, 13–17Google Scholar; Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 27–31.Google Scholar Also see Hoogenboom, Ari, Outlawing the Spoils: A History of the Civil Service Reform Movement, 1865–1883 (Urbana, 1961)Google Scholar and Sproat, John G., The Best Men: Liberal Reformers in the Gilded Age (New York, 1968).Google Scholar

12 Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 133–37.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 116.

14 McCormick, , “The Party Period and Public Policy,” 208Google Scholar; Salisbury, , “The Republican Party and Positive Government,” 20Google Scholar; Cherny, , American Politics in the Gilded Age, 18Google Scholar; Gould, Lewis L., “Party Conflict: Republicans versus Democrats, 1877–1901,” in The Gilded Age: Essays on the Origins of Modem America, ed., Calhoun, Charles W. (Wilmington, DE, 1996): 215–16.Google Scholar

15 Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 223Google Scholar; Gould, , “Party Conflict: Republicans versus Democrats,” 221.Google Scholar

16 Kelley, , “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” 154–56.Google Scholar

17 Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 226–32.Google Scholar A number of other factors, including the defection of the Mugwumps, the emergence of the Prohibition Party, and a highly publicized fund-raising dinner at the lavish Delmonico's Restaurant for the nation's richest movers and shakers the evening of the Burchard incident also contributed to Blaine's narrow defeat in New York. See Wahlgren, Mark Summers, Rum, Romanism, & Rebellion: The Making of a President, 1884 (Chapel Hill, 2000), 280–87, 296.Google Scholar

18 Kelley, , “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” 150.Google Scholar Also see Formisano, Ronald P., “The Invention of the Ethnocultural Interpretation,” American Historical Review 99 (April 1994): 453–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Jensen, Richard, The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896 (Chicago, 1971).Google Scholar

19 Wright, James E., “The Ethnocultural Model of Voting: A Behavioral and Historical Critique,” American Behavioral Scientist 16 (May/June 1973): 662–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cherny, , American Politics in the Gilded Age, 27–29Google Scholar; Calhoun, Charles W., “The Political Culture: Public Life and the Conduct of Politics,” in Calhoun, The Gilded Age, 200, 207Google Scholar; Holt, Michael F., “The Primacy of Party Reasserted,” Journal of American History 86 (June 1999): 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Lebsock, Suzanne, “Women and American Politics: 1880–1920,” in Women, Politics, and Change, eds., Tilly, Louise A. and Gurin, Patricia (New York, 1990): 35.Google Scholar Also see Edwards, Rebecca, Angels in the Machinery: Gender in American Party Politics from the Civil War to the Progressive Era (New York, 1997).Google Scholar

21 Lebsock, , “Women and American Politics,” 37–41Google Scholar; Flanagan, Maureen A., “Gender and Urban Reform: The City Club and the Woman's City Club of Chicago in the Progressive Era,” American Historical Review 95 (October 1990): 1032–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Painter, Nell Irvin, Standing at Armageddon: The United States, 1877–1919 (New York, 1987), 15–18, 21–22.Google Scholar

23 McCormick, , “Public Life in Industrial America,” 98.Google Scholar Also see Fink, Leon, Workingmen's Democracy: The Knights of Labor and American Politics (Urbana, 1983)Google Scholar and Grob, Gerald N., Workers and Utopia: A Study of Ideological Conflict in the American Labor Movement, 1865–1900 (Evanston, IL, 1961).Google Scholar

24 McCormick, , “Public Life in Industrial America,” 100.Google Scholar

25 Miller, Worth Robert, “Farmers and Third-Party Politics in Late Nineteenth-Century America,” in Calhoun, The Gilded Age, 235–60Google Scholar; McMath, Robert C. Jr., American Populism: A Social History, 1877–1898 (New York, 1993).Google Scholar

26 Miller, , “Farmers and Third-Party Politics,” 241–43.Google Scholar

27 Gould, , “Party Conflict: Republicans versus Democrats,” 223Google Scholar; Kelley, , “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” 159–60Google Scholar; Salisbury, , “The Republican Party and Positive Government,” 28.Google Scholar

28 Gould, , “Party Conflict: Republicans versus Democrats,” 216Google Scholar; Kelley, , “The Democracy of Tilden and Cleveland,” 161–63.Google Scholar

29 Morgan, , From Hayes to McKinley, 320–64.Google Scholar

30 For Populism and republicanism see Miller, Worth Robert, Oklahoma Populism: A History of the People's Party in the Oklahoma Territory (Norman, OK, 1987).Google Scholar

31 Spalding, John, Great Depressions: 1837–1844, 1893–1897, 1929–1939 (Glenview, IL, 1966), 58–59.Google Scholar

32 For Coxey's Army see Schwantes, Carlos, Coxey's Army: An American Odyssey (Lincoln, NE, 1985).Google Scholar For the Pullman strike see Buder, Stanley, Pullman: An Experiment in Industrial Order and Community Planning, 1880–1930 (New York, 1967)Google Scholar and Salvatore, Nick, Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist (Urbana, 1982).Google Scholar

33 Tindall, George B., “The People's Party,” in History of United States Political Parties, ed., Schlesinger, Arthur Meier Jr., (New York, 1973): 1719–20Google Scholar; Pierce, Michael, “The Populist President of the American Federation of Labor: The Career of John McBride, 1880–1895,” Labor History 41 (February 2000): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 McMath, , American Populism, 199–200Google Scholar; Tindall, , “The People's Party,” 1723–24.Google Scholar

35 Pierce, , “The Populist President,” 23.Google Scholar

36 Morgan, H. Wayne, “The Gilded Age,” American Heritage 35 (August/September 1984): 45.Google Scholar

37 Argersinger, Peter H., Structure, Process, and Party: Essays in American Political History (Armonk, NY, 1992), 53–54, 59–61Google Scholar; McCormick, , “The Party Period and Public Policy,” 222–23Google Scholar; McCormick, , “Public Life in Industrial America,” 102–03Google Scholar; Burnham, , “The Appearance and Disappearance of the American Voter,” 53.Google Scholar