Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:29:34.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the German Schoolmaster's Psychology to the Psychology of the Child: Evolving Rationales for the Teaching of History in U.S. Schools in the 1890s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2011

Thomas D. Fallace
Thomas D. Fallace*
Affiliation:
William Paterson University of New Jersey
*
[email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rationale for teaching history proposed by most professional historians in the 1890s was based on faculty psychology—the theory that the mind was composed of mental faculties such as memory and will that could be strengthened like muscles. However, over the course of the decade this approach was gradually replaced by a functional approach to mind and society, which had roots in the new psychology of Wilhelm Wundt. This development was accompanied by a pedagogical shift in learning theory from an emphasis on exertion of the students' will to engaging students' interest. John Dewey, William James, and the American followers of German pedagogical theorist, Johann Frederich Herbart, directly challenged the faculty psychology of the German-inspired professional historians but still placed history at the center of their pedagogical schemes. As a result, history gained a central place in U.S. elementary and secondary curriculum during these years, but paradoxically the new psychology gradually eroded the influence of professional historians on the curriculum, because they failed to acknowledge these emerging pedagogical and psychological theories.

Type
Essays
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 161 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nash, Gary B., Crabtree, Charlotte, and Dunn, Ross E., History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past (New York, 1997)Google Scholar, 37.

2 Hiner, N. Ray, “Professionals in Progress: Changing Relations between Historians and Educators, 1896–1911,” History of Education Quarterly 12 (Spring 1972): 34–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Hiner, N. Ray, “Professionals in Progress: Changing Relations among Social Scientists, Historians and Educators, 1880–1920,” History Teacher 6 (Spring 1973): 201–18Google Scholar.

3 Tyrrell, Ian, Historians in Public: The Practice of American History 1890–1970 (Chicago, 2005)Google Scholar, 114.

4 Reuben, Julie, “Beyond Politics: Community Civics and the Redefinition of Citizenship in the Progressive Era,” History of Education Quarterly 37 (Fall 1997)Google Scholar: 401.

5 See Ross, Dorothy, The Origins of American Social Science (New York, 1991)Google Scholar, for the transition from historicism to scientism in the social sciences; and Menand, Louis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (New York, 2001)Google Scholar, for the transition from positivism to pragmatism and pluralism in social thought.

6 Salmon, Lucy, “The Study of History in Elementary Schools,” Educational Review (May 1891)Google Scholar: 438. On Diesterweg, Ulich, Robert, A Sequence of Educational Influences: Traced through Unpublished Writings of Pentalozzi, Froebel, Diesterweg, Horace Mann, and Henry Barnard (Cambridge, MA, 1935), 17–39Google Scholar.

7 Herbst, Jurgen, The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study in the Transfer of Culture (Ithaca, 1965)Google Scholar; Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (New York, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rodgers, Daniel T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar.

8 Salmon, Lucy, “History in German Gymnasia,” Educational Review (Feb. 1898)Google Scholar: 170, 173.

9 Adams quotation from McMurry, Dorothy, Herbartian Contributions to History Instruction in American Schools (New York, 1946)Google Scholar, 13.

10 Hall, G. Stanley, “Introduction” in Methods of History, ed. Hall, G. Stanley (Boston, 1883Google Scholar), vii, ix, xi.

11 Diesterweg, “Instruction in History” in Methods of History, ed. Hall, 31, 41.

12 Reece, William J., “The Philosopher-King of St. Louis” in Curriculum and Consequence: Herbert Kliebard and the Promise of Schooling, ed. Franklin, Barry (New York, 2000), 153–77Google Scholar.

13 Harris, William Torrey, “Professor Dewey's Doctrine of Interest as Related to Will,” Educational Review 11 (May 1896)Google Scholar: 492.

14 Harris, William Torrey, “Report of the Subcommittee on the Correlation of Studies on Elementary Education,” Report of the Committee of Fifteen on Elementary Education (1895; New York, 1969)Google Scholar, 52, 53, 54.

15 Thompson, Anna Boyton, “The Educational Value of History,” Educational Review 15 (Apr. 1895)Google Scholar: 367, 364, 363.

16 Harris, William Torrey, Psychologic Foundations of Education: An Attempt to Show the Genesis of the Higher Faculties of the Mind (New York, 1902)Google Scholar, viii.

17 Harris, Psychologic Foundations, viii-x, 8–9.

18 On the backgrounds and ideologies of these historians, see Whelan, Michael, “Albert Bushnell Hart and the Origins of Social Studies Education,” Theory and Research in Social Education 33 (Fall 1994): 423–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Whelan, , “James Harvey Robinson, the New History, and the 1916 Social Studies Report,” History Teacher 24 (Feb. 1991): 191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 National Education Association, Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies with the Reports Arranged by the Committees (New York, 1894)Google Scholar, 185.

20 Ibid., 168, 170.

21 The Study of History in Schools: Report to the American Historical Association by the Committee of Seven (New York, 1906)Google Scholar, 102.

22 McMurry, Charles, The Elements of General Method: Based on the Principles of Herbart, rev. ed. (New York, 1903)Google Scholar, 77.

23 O'Donnell, John M., The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920 (New York, 1985), 9–13Google Scholar.

24 Bowler, Peter J., The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900 (Baltimore, 1983)Google Scholar; Stocking, George Jr., Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology (Chicago, 1968), 234–69Google Scholar.

25 Richards, Robert J., Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior (Chicago, 1987), 522–24Google Scholar.

26 Hall, G. Stanley, “The New Psychology as a Basis of Education,” Forum, Mar. 1894Google Scholar, 716.

27 Hall, “The New Psychology,” 714–15, 719.

28 Dewey, John, “From Absolutism to Experimentalism” (1930) in John Dewey: The Later Works, vol. 5 of The Collected Works of John Dewey, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann (Carbondale, IL, 1984)Google Scholar, 157.

29 Dewey, John, “The Psychological Aspect of the School Curriculum” (1897) in John Dewey: The Early Works, vol. 4 of The Collected Works of John Dewey, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann (Carbondale, IL, 1971)Google Scholar, 165.

30 Small, Albion, “Demands of Sociology upon Pedagogy,” Addresses and Proceedings: National Education Association of the United States (1896)Google Scholar: 177, 183.

31 John Dewey, “The Interpretation Side of Child-Study” (1897) in John Dewey: The Early Works, 218.

32 Dewey, John, “Ethical Principles Underlying Education” in The National Herbart Society for the Scientific Study of Teaching, Third Yearbook (Chicago, 1897)Google Scholar, 18, 24.

33 Ibid., 21.

34 Ibid., 25.

35 Gardner, Howard, The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution (New York, 1987)Google Scholar, 102.

36 McMurry, Herbartian Contributions, 30–40.

37 DeGarmo, Charles, The Essentials of Methods: A Discussion of the Essential Form of Right Methods in Teaching: Observation, Generalization, Application (Boston, 1889)Google Scholar. See also Sir Adams, John, The Herbartian Psychology Applied to Education (New York, 1897)Google Scholar; Dodd, Catherine Isabel, Introduction to the Herbartian Principles of Teaching (New York, 1898)Google Scholar.

38 Van Liew, C.C., “The Educational Theory of Cultural Epochs: Viewed Historically and Critically” in The Yearbook of the Herbart Society for the Scientific Study of Teaching (Chicago, 1895)Google Scholar, 113.

39 Hall, G. Stanley, “Moral Education and Will Training,” Pedagogical Seminary 2 (June 1892)CrossRefGoogle Scholar: 88.

40 Diesterweg, Instruction in History, 32–33.

41 See McMurry, Elements of General Method, 82.

42 Ibid., 50.

43 Hall, “Moral Education,” 72, 85.

44 Harris, William Torrey, “Herbart's Doctrine of Interest,” Educational Review 10 (June 1895)Google Scholar: 73.

45 Dewey, John, “Interest as Related to the Will” (1895) in John Dewey: The Early WorksGoogle Scholar, 141, 124.

46 Ibid., 122.

47 Tucker, Henry, “The Doctrine of Interest in the Social Sciences in the High School,” History Teacher's Magazine 3 (Mar. 1912)Google Scholar: 51–53.

48 Blair, Frank, “The Social Function of History” in Fourth Yearbook of the National Herbart Society, ed. McMurry, Charles (1898)Google Scholar, 44, 56.

49 The Study of History in Secondary Schools: Report to the American Historical Association by a Committee of Five (New York, 1911), 39–40Google Scholar, 66.

50 Thorndike, Edward and Woodworth, R.S., “The Influence of Improvement in One Mental Function upon the Efficiency of Other Functions,” Psychological Review (May 1901)Google Scholar: 250.

51 Thorndike's behavioral psychology was not entirely compatible with the James-Dewey functional psychology. In his famous critique of the reflex arc, Dewey attacked such mechanistic approaches to consciousness. Nevertheless, both approaches challenged the dualism of the mental faculty approach and viewed action as a necessary component of thought. See Dewey, John, “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology” (1896) in John Dewey: The Early Works, 96–110Google Scholar.

52 Quoted in Osbourne, Ken, “Fred Marrow Fling and the Source-Method of Teaching History,” Theory and Research in Social Education 31 (Fall 2003): 466–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar (quotations 488).

53 The Study of History in Schools: Report to the American Historical Association by the Committee of Seven, 101–10.

54 Ibid., 102.

55 Snedden, David, “Teaching of History in Secondary Schools,” History Teachers Magazine 5 (Nov. 1914)Google Scholar: 278.

56 Ibid., 282, 281.

57 Stevens, Romiett, “Waste in History Instruction,” History Teachers Magazine 4 (Feb. 1913)Google Scholar: 53.

58 Quoted in Hiner, “Professionals in Progress,” 46.

59 Johnson, Henry, Teaching of History in Elementary and Secondary Schools (New York, 1916), 159–60Google Scholar.

60 Robbins, C.R., The School as a Social Institution: An Introduction to the Study of Social Development (New York, 1918)Google Scholar, 214.

61 See Fallace, Thomas D., “John Dewey and the Origins of the Social Studies: An Analysis of the Historiography and New Interpretation,” Review of Educational Research (Summer 2009): 601–24Google Scholar; and Fallace, , “Did the Social Studies Really Replace History in American Secondary Schools?” Teachers College Record 110 (Oct. 2008): 2245–70Google Scholar.