Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:56:28.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making the Case for Night Work Legislation in Progressive Era New York, 1911-19151

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2010

John Thomas McGuire
John Thomas McGuire
Affiliation:
Tompkins-Corltand Community College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1907 the New York Court of Appeals considered a bindery company's challenge to a night work law passed by New York's legislature in 1898 and amended in 1903. The statute stated that “no female shall be employed, permitted, or suffered to work in any factory in this state before six o'clock in the morning, or after nine o'clock in the evening of any day.” The outcome of the case was preordained, for New York's highest court was famous for advocating the legal “freedom of contract” principle, which negated state efforts to limit workers' hours. From 1878 through 1904 the Court of Appeals had held that any restriction on laborers' hours was unconstitutional. The only exception, Lochner v. New York, had been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court on appeal.

Type
Essays
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 47 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 The night work case is People v. Williams, 189 N.Y. 131 (1907)Google Scholar, while the amended law can be found in Laws of the State of New York Passed at the One Hundred and Twenty-Sixth Session of the Legislature: Begun January First 1903 and Ended April Twenty-Third 1903 in the City of Albany, Vol. I. (Albany, N.Y., 1903), 437, 439Google Scholar. For the cases which established the New York Court of Appeals as a formidable advocate of the freedom of contract principle, see Bertholf v. O'Reilly, 74 N.Y. 509 (1878)Google Scholar, In re Jacobs, 98 N.Y. 98 (1885)Google Scholar, In re Marx, 99 N.Y. 377 (1885)Google Scholar, and People v. Rodgers, 166 N.Y. 1 (1901)Google Scholar.

3 People v. Williams, 189 N.Y. 131, at 134, 136. A copy of the New York State Attorney General's Office's brief can be found in Mary van Kleeck Papers, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, Mass., MS Group 165, Box 71, Folder 1111. The quotation is from Baker, Elizabeth Faulkner, Protective Labor Legislation with Special Reference to Women in the State of New York (New York, 1925), 72Google Scholar.

4 Memorandum by Kelley, Florence, November 1906, quoted in Clement Vose, “The National Consumers' League and the Brandeis Brief,” Midwest Journal of Political Science 1 (Nov. 1957): 283Google Scholar.

5 For a description of the convoluted history of women's labor legislation before the Progressive Era, see Nancy Woloch, Muller v. Oregon: A Brief History With Documents (Boston, 1996), 17Google Scholar; Sklar, Kathryn Kish, Florence Kelley and the Nation's Work: The Rise of Women's Political Culture, 1820-1900 (New Haven, 1995), 281Google Scholar; Lehrer, Susan, Origins of Protective Legislationfor Women, 1900-1925 (Albany, N.Y, 1987), 55Google Scholar; and White, G. Edward, Introduction, The American Judicial Tradition: Profiles of Leading American Judges (New York, 1988), 2Google Scholar. For the widespread adoption of women's hours laws after Muller v. Oregon, see Brandeis, Elizabeth, “Labor Legislation” in History of Labor in the United States, 1896-1932. Vol. 3 of Commons, John R. et al. (New York, 1935), 472Google Scholar.

6 Kessler-Harris, Alice, Out to Work: A History of Wage Earning Women in the United States (1982; New York, 1983), 193, 196, 201–05Google Scholar.

7 For a further discussion of this goal, see McGuire, John Thomas, “From the Courts to the State Legislatures,” Labor History 45 (May 2004): 225–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Goldmark, Josephine, Impatient Crusader: Florence Kelley's Life Story (Urbana, 1953), 160Google Scholar.

9 , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 147Google Scholar; , Sklar, Florence Kelley, 237, 248Google Scholar.

10 New York Times, Apr. 29, 1914Google Scholar.

11 The literature on state legislative efforts during the Progressive Era is voluminous. See, for example, Gullett, Gayle, Becoming Citizens: The Emergence and Development of the California Women's Movement, 1880-1911 (Urbana, 2000)Google Scholar; Buenker, John D., The History of Wisconsin: Vol. IV, The Progressive Years, 1893-1914 (Madison, Wis., 1978)Google Scholar; Kerr, Thomas J., IV, “The New York Factory Investigating Commission and the Minimum Wage Movement,” Labor History 11 (Winter 1971): 373–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Felt, Jeremy, Hostages of Fortune: Child Labor Reform in New York State (Syracuse, N.Y., 1965)Google Scholar . A good overview of night work legislation can be found in Kessler-Harris, Alice, “The Paradox of Night Work Restrictions in the United States” in Protecting Women: Labor Legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, ed. Alice Kessler-Harris, Ulla Wikander, and Lewis, Jane (Urbana, 1995)Google Scholar . For a groundbreaking analysis of women's reform activities in New York during the nineteenth century, see Baker, Paula, “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political History, 1780-1920,” American Historical Review 89 (1984): 620–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Freedman, Estelle B., “Separatism As Strategy: Female Institution Building and American Feminism, 1870-1930,” Feminist Studies 5 (Fall 1979): 512–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar , remains the leading essay on the ”separate spheres” formulation. For Perry's, Elisabeth Israels comments, see her “Men Are from the Gilded Age, Women Are from the Progressive Era,” Journalof the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 1 (Jan. 2002), 36–37Google Scholar.

12 Schwartz, Joel, “The Triumph of Liberalism, 1914-1945” in The Empire State: A History of New York, ed. Klein, Milton M. (Ithaca, N.Y, 2001), 527Google Scholar; and Perkins, Frances, The Roosevelt I Knew (1946; New York, 1965), 23Google Scholar.

13 For Felix Frankfurter's relationship with Florence Kelley, see McGuire, John Thomas, “A Catalyst for Reform: The Women's Joint Legislative Conference (WJLC) and Its Fight for Labor Legislation in New York State, 1918-1933” (Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Binghamton, 2001), 163–78Google Scholar . For Frankfurter's later evaluation of Kelley, see Goldmark, Introduction, Impatient Crusader, v. Kelley describes her visit to the Pennsylvania factory in “My Philadelphia,” Survey Graphic 57 (October 1, 1926): 7–11, 50-57Google Scholar . For William Kelley's background, see , Sklar, Florence Kelley and the Nation's Work, 8-13, 37–43Google Scholar.

14 , Baker, “The Domestication of Politics,” 638Google Scholar.

15 For more information on how women and the abolitionist movement, see Sklar, Kathryn Kish, ed., Women's Rights Emerges within the Anti-Slavery Movement 1830-1870: A Brief History With Documents (Boston, 2000), 4-5, 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Pugh's influence on Kelley can be seen in , Sklar, Florence Kelley, 15–26Google Scholar.

16 , Sklar, Florence Kelley, 101-05, 168–72Google Scholar

17 Sklar, Kathryn Kish, “Hull House in the 1890s: A Community of Women Reformers,” Signs 10 (1985): 665–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Addams, Jane, Twenty Years of Hull House, With Autobiographical Notes (1910; Urbana, 1990), 77Google Scholar.

18 Storrs, Landon R.Y., Civilizing Capitalism: The National Consumers' League, Women's Activism, and Eabor Standards in the New Deal Era (Chapel Hill, 2000), 14–15Google Scholar.

19 Nathan, Maud, The Story of an Epoch-Making Movement (1926; New York, 1986), 16, 25Google Scholar.

20 , Nathan, The Story of an Epoch-Making Movement, 26Google Scholar.

21 , Nathan, The Story of an Epoch-Making Movement, 29–30Google Scholar . Dirks, Jacqueline, “Righteous Goods: Women's Production, Reform Publicity, and the National Consumers' League, 1891-1919” (Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1996), 87–88Google Scholar.

22 For more on the Equality League, see Dubois, Ellen Carol, Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Winning of Woman Suffrage (New Haven, 1997), 92–93, 95Google Scholar , and Dubois, Ellen Carol, “Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Transformation of Class Relations Among Woman Suffragists” in Gender, Class, Race and Reform in the Progressive Era, ed. Frankel, Noralee and Dye, Nancy Schrom (Lexington, Ken., 1991), 165Google Scholar.

23 , McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform,” 31–40Google Scholar.

24 For more details on the consequential 1909-1910 garment workers' strike, see Mary Dreier to Margaret Dreier Robins, November [?] 1909, Margaret Dreier Robins Papers, Microfilm Edition, Reel 21; McCreesh, Carolyn D., Women in the Campaign To Organise Garment Workers, 1880-1917 (New York, 1985), 133Google Scholar; Foner, Philip, Women and the Labor Movement from Colonial Times to the Eve of World War I (New York, 1979), 327, 330–31Google Scholar; and Schneiderman, Rose with Goldwaithe, Lucy, All for One (New York, 1967), 92, 94Google Scholar . I am currently developing an article which analyzes the Nywtul's efforts from 1911 through 1915.

25 Feld, Marjorie Nan, “Lillian D. Wald and Mutuality in Twentieth Century America” (Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University, 2002), 69Google Scholar.

26 Daniels, Doris Groshen, “Wald, Lillian D. (1867-1940)” in Jewish Women In America: An Historical Encyclopedia, ed. Hyman, Paula E. and Moore, Deborah Dash (New York, 1997), Vol. II, 1446–47Google Scholar.

27 , Daniels, “Wald, Lillian D. (1867-1940),” 1447Google Scholar.

28 , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 81–82Google Scholar.

29 Dinerman, Miriam, “Goldmark, Pauline (1874-1962)” in Jewish Women In America: An Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. II, 532–33Google Scholar . , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 1–2Google Scholar.

30 , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 82–83Google Scholar . “Josephine Goldmark” in American National biography, Vol. 9, 200Google Scholar.

31 New York Times, December 16, 1950Google Scholar. For more information on this fascinating woman, see Sklar, Kathryn Kish, “Goldmark, Josephine Clara (1877-1950)” in Jewish Women In America: An Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. I, 531–32Google Scholar; “Josephine Goldmark” in American National Biography, Vol. 9, 199–200Google Scholar; and “Josephine Goldmark” in Notable American Women, 1607-1950, A Biographical Dictionary, Vol. II, 60–61Google Scholar. Jacobs, Ruth, “The Substance Survives: The Lasting Contributions of Josephine Goldmark” (B.A. thesis, Brandeis University, 1997)Google Scholar , is a short honors thesis on Goldmark's life.

32 , McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform,” 169, 295–299Google Scholar.

33 Goldmark, Josephine, Pilgrims of '48: One Man's Part in the Austrian Revolution of 1848 and a Family Migration to America (1930; New York, 1975), 3–5Google Scholar.

34 , Goldmark, Pilgrims of '48, 15–122Google Scholar.

35 , Goldmark, Pilgrims of '48, 125–66Google Scholar.

36 , Goldmark, Pilgrims of '48, 248–88Google Scholar.

37 , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 82Google Scholar.

38 Introduction, Pilgrims of '48, xiii.

39 , Goldmark, Pilgrims of '48, 177–214Google Scholar . See footnotes on pp. 5-27 of The Family Letters of Louis D. Brandeis, ed. Urofsky, Melvin I. and Levy, David W (Norman, Ok., 2002)Google Scholar , which provide a concise explanation of the interfamilial ties.

40 Louis Brandeis to , Susan and Brandeis, Elizabeth, August 8, 1904, in The Family Letters of louis D. Brandeis, 91Google Scholar.

41 Louis Brandeis to Alfred Brandeis, December 4, 1909, Louis Brandeis to Alice Goldmark Brandeis, April 23, 1910, and Louis Brandeis to Alice Goldmark Brandeis, March 21, 1911, in The Family Utters of Louis D. Brandeis, 133, 147-48 and 162.

42 Louis Brandeis to Josephine Clara Goldmark, October 11, 1910, in The Family Letters of Louis D. Branders, 157.

43 Goldmark, Josephine, “Working Women and the Laws: A Record of Neglect,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 28 (July-December 1906): 261–62Google Scholar.

44 , Goldmark, Impatient Crusader, 160Google Scholar.

45 Glenn, John M., Brandt, Lillian, and Andrews, F. Emerson, Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1946, Vol. 1 (New York, 1947), 10–12Google Scholar . Agoratus, Steven, “The Core of Progressivism: Research Institutions and Social Policy, 1907-1940” (D.A. diss., Carnegie Mellon University, 1996), 11, 39Google Scholar.

46 Kleeck, Mary van to editor of the Daily Worker, August 8, 1933Google Scholar , “Mary Van Kleeck Raps ‘Forced Peace’ Board, Resigns,” article by Federated Press (n.d., prob. August 1933)Google Scholar , and “Mary Van Kleeck Raps NRA Policy,” in van Kleeck Papers, Box 6, Folders 100, 106, and 107, respectively. For van Kleeck's passport problems, see van Kleeck Papers, Box 1, Folder 14.

47 The best sources for Kleeck's, Mary van life are “Mary van Kleeck,” American National Biography, Vol. 22, 224–26Google Scholar; Alchon, Guy, “Mary Van Kleeck and Social-Economic Planning,” journal of Policy History 3 (1991): 3–4, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “Mary Van Kleeck,” Notable American Women: The Modern Period: A Biographical Dictionary, Vol. IV, 707–09Google Scholar . (In the 1920s she changed her name from “Van Kleeck” to “van Kleeck.”) The reason for the RSF's grant to van Kleeck is given in Glenn, Brandt, and , Andrews, Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1946, Vol. I, 154–55Google Scholar.

48 Kleeck, Mary van, “Working Hours for Women in Factories,” Charities and the Commons 17 (October 1906): 14, 16, 17Google Scholar.

49 Kleeck, van, “Working Hours of Women,” 18Google Scholar.

50 Mary van Kleeck to John M. Glenn, June 3, 1911, van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1564.

51 “Industrial Studies of the Russell Sage Foundation: A Record of Thirty-Five Years of Fact-Finding on the Social Aspects of Industry, 1944,” Kleeck, van Papers, MS Group 165, Box 99, Folder 1549Google Scholar . “Suggestions for Investigations of Women's Work in New York,” [n.d., prob. early 1910] and “A Program for a Committee on Women's Work, April 23, 1910,” both in van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1571. Glenn, Brandt, and , Andrews, Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1946, Vol. I, 154Google Scholar.

52 “Memorandum Regarding Immediate Plans, January 19, 1911,” van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1564. Mary van Kleeck to John M. Glenn, February 27, 1911, van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1565.

53 Kleeck, van, “Working Hours of Women,” 21Google Scholar.

54 Beyer, Clara Mortenson, History of Labor Legislationfor Women in Three States, United States Women's Bureau, Bulletin 66, Part I (Washington, D.C., 1929), 76Google Scholar. The new hours law did pass constitutional muster in People ex. rel. Holderin v. Kane, 139 N.Y.S. 350 (S. Ct. Special Term, Kings County, N.Y. 1913). See also Mary van Kleeck to John M. Glenn, November 12, 1912 and December 16, 1912, in van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1564.

55 Mary van Kleeck to John M. Glenn, November 12, 1912 and January 15, 1913, in van Kleeck Papers, MS Group 165, Box 100, Folder 1564.

56 Van Kleeck to Glenn, January 15, 1913.

57 t I should be noted that Josephine Goldmark's book was originally published by the Russell Sage Foundation in 1912. Louis Brandeis urged the Foundation to publish Goldmark's book, particularly since Brandeis used material from his sister-in-law's manuscript in the Illinois women's ten hour law brief. Louis Brandeis to John M. Glenn, November 30, 1909, reprinted in Letters of Louis D. Brandeis: Vol. II (1907-1912); People's Attorney, ed. Urofsky, Melvin I. and Levy, David W. (Albany, N.Y, 1972), 297–98Google Scholar . For the original publication date of Fatigue and Efficiency, see Letters of Louis D. Brandeis, 298, Note 2.

58 Goldmark, Josephine, Fatigue and Efficiency: A Study of Industry (1912; New York, 1913), 267–68Google Scholar.

59 Kleeck, Mary van, Women in the bookbinding Trade (New York, 1913), 143Google Scholar.

60 Kleeck, van, Women in the Bookbinding Trade, 143–45Google Scholar.

61 O'Connor, Richard, The First Hurrah: A Biography of Alfred E. Smith (New York, 1970), 64Google Scholar . Stein, Leon, The Triangle Fire (1962; New York, 1985), 14-66, 109Google Scholar . See also the excellent web site produced by Cornell University's Industrial and Labor Relations School's Kheel Center on the fire and its aftermath, located at http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/trianglefire.

62 Martin, George, Madam Secretary: Frances Perkins (Boston, 1976), 88Google Scholar . , Stein, Triangle Fire, 208Google Scholar . For details of the FIC's initial investigations, see Preliminary Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, Vol. I (Albany, N.Y., 1912), 16Google Scholar.

63 For Charles F. Murphy and his leadership of New York's Democrati c Party during the Progressive Era, see , Schwartz, “The Triumph of Liberalism, 1914-1945,” 521Google Scholar; Wesser, Robert F., A Response to Progressivism: The Democratic Party and New York Politics, 1902-1918 (New York, 1986), 31Google Scholar; and Handlin, Oscar, Al Smith and His America (New York, 1958), 31, 41Google Scholar.

64 See “Factory Investigating Commission” in Historical Dictionary of the Progressive Era: 1890-1920, ed. Buenker, John D. and Kantowicz, Edward R. (New York, 1988), 335Google Scholar . John McClymer notes that despite the FIC's impressive accomplishments, scholars have paid “little heed” to the Commission. , McClymer, The Triangle Strike and Fire (Philadelphia, 1998), 178Google Scholar . This oversight is beginning to change; see, for example, Greenwald, Richard A., The Triangle Fire, the Protocols of Peace, and Industrial Democracy in Progressive Era New York (Philadelphia, 2005)Google Scholar.

65 Mary van Kleeck to John Glenn, May 31, 1912 and January 3, 1913, van Kleeck Papers, MS 165, Box 100, Folders 1564 and 1565.

66 Smith, Alfred R., Up to Now: An Autobiography (New York, 1929), 7-8, 93, 97, 129Google Scholar.

67 State of New York: Preliminary Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, 1912, Vol. II (Albany, NY, 1912)Google Scholar , “List of Witnesses1,” and State of New York: Preliminary Report of the Factor) Investigating Commission, 1912, Vol. III (Albany, N.Y., 1912), 1222–24, 1292, 1595, 1613Google Scholar.

68 Preliminary Report, Vol. II, 551-52. , Smith, Up to Now, 94Google Scholar . For business involvement in progressive reform, see Sklar, Martin J., The Corporate Reconstruction of Capitalism, 1890-1916: The Market, the Law and Politics (New York, 1988), 1, 4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Wiebe, Robert, Businessmen and Reform: A Study of the Progressive Movement (Cambridge, Mass., 1962)Google Scholar.

69 State of New York, Second Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, 1913, Vol. IV: Testimony and Proceedings (Albany, N.Y., 1913), 1172, 2013–14Google Scholar.

70 “Quarterly Report Ending December 31, 1913, Women's Work Committee,” van Kleeck Papers, MS 165, Box 100, Folder 1567. See also , Kerr, “The Factory Investigating Commission and the Minimum Wage Movement,” 376Google Scholar.

71 , Kessler-Harris, “The Paradox of Night Work Restrictions in the United States,” 345Google Scholar.

72 State of New York: Second Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, 1913: Vol. III: Testimony and Proceedings (Albany, N.Y., 1913)Google Scholar , “Hearings and Proceedings of the Commission,” ix, and State of New York: Second Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, 1913, Vol. IV: Testimony and Proceedings (Albany, N.Y, 1913), 1650–53Google Scholar.

73 Glenn, Brandt, and , Andrews, Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1946, Vol. I., 126-27, 155Google Scholar . See also New York Times, April 29, 1914Google Scholar.

74 See Goldmark's brief, reprinted in The Case Against Nightwork for Women, Revised with New Introduction to March 1, 1918 (New York, 1918)Google Scholar.

75 State of New York Fourth Report of the Factory Investigating Commission, 191 5, Vol. I (Albany, N.Y., 1915), 304, 305-06, 313, 319, 322, 330Google Scholar.

76 See People v. Charles Scbweinler Press, reprinted in Appendix, Case Against Nighi'ork for Women, 348-51.

77 Quoted in Mason, Alpheus Thomas, Brandeis: A Free Man's Life (New York, 1946), 250Google Scholar.

78 For the subsequent developments concerning People v. Charles Schweinler Press, see Goldmark, Josephine, Introduction, Case Against Nightwork for Women, A4 and Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292 (1924)Google Scholar.

79 Quoted in Savers, Evelyn L., “Thaddeus C. Sweet” in Bicentennial Issue: The journal, 1976-77, Oswego County Historical Society, ed. Salisbury, W. Seward (Oswego, N.Y., 1977), 84Google Scholar . See also , McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform,” 79–83Google Scholar.

80 , McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform,” 87–156Google Scholar . See also McGuire, John Thomas, “Two Feminist Visions: Social Justice Feminism and Equal Rights, 1899-1940,” Pennsylvania History: A journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies 71 (Autumn 2004): 445–78Google Scholar.

81 For Elizabeth Brandeis, see , McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform,” 167-68, 299–300Google Scholar , as well as Gordon, Linda, Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890-1935 (Cambridge, Mass., 1994), 72, 75, 202Google Scholar.

82 McGuire, “A Catalyst for Reform.”