Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:32:08.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eyes of Anna Held: Sex and Sight in the Progressive Era1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2011

David Monod
David Monod*
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nineteenth century was an era of perceptual certitude. Scientists collected and cataloged, explorers mapped and charted, artists rendered what they observed. The empirical approach to perception was grounded in the ideas that God had created an orderly and rational world and that the senses connected people to the intrinsic meanings of the things they contacted and observed. But by the 1890s, uncertainty about the reality of what people perceived was beginning to transform American popular culture. Among other things, the acceptance of perception as relative transformed attitudes to erotic displays and provided a foundation for the modernization of sexual attitudes. Anna Held was a prominent performer whose sexual play excited and challenged Progressive Era audiences. The public's response to her sexuality reveals the depth of the doubt that the questioning of Victorian certitude created. The progressive impulse, which sought to reaffirm certainty with regard to sexual identities and behaviors, can be seen as a reaction to the doubts that cultural modernists embraced and Anna Held's public enjoyed.

Type
Essays
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 289 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Thanks to Darryl Dee, Susan Glenn, Alison Kibler, Darren Mulloy, and the journal's reviewers for their comments on this paper.

References

2 Evening World (New York), Dec. 9, 1903; New York Telegraph, Sept. 4, 1902; undated clipping, vol. 264, Robinson Locke Collection, series 1, in the Billy Rose Theater Collection, New York Public Library [hereafter Robinson Locke].

3 Cole, Sarah, “Modernism, Male Intimacy, and the Great War” ELH 68 (Summer 2001): 471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Bederman, Gail, Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917 (Chicago, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ullman, Sharon R., Sex Seen: The Emergence of Modern Sexuality in America (Berkeley, 1997), 42Google Scholar.

4 Feldman, Egal, “Prostitution, the Alien Woman, and the Progressive Imagination, 1910–1915,” American Quarterly 19 (Summer 1967): 192–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strong, Bryan, “Ideas of the Early Sex Education Movement in America, 1890–1920,” History of Education Quarterly 12 (Summer 1972): 129–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Burnham, John C., “The Progressive Era Revolution in American Attitudes Toward Sex,” Journal of American History 59 (Mar. 1973): 885–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kushner, Howard, “Nineteenth-Century Sexuality and the Sexual Revolution of the Progressive Era,” Canadian Review of American Studies 9 (Spring 1978): 34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, Rosalind, Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism (New Haven, 1982)Google Scholar; Lunbeck, Elizabeth, “‘A New Generation of Women’: Progressive Psychiatrists and the Hypersexual Female,” Feminist Studies 13 (Autumn 1987): 513–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Friedman, Andrea, Prurient Interests: Gender, Democracy and Obscenity in New York City, 1909–1945 (New York, 2000)Google Scholar. In more recent works, such as Friedman's, the dichotomy traditionally drawn between sexual freedom and bourgeois repression breaks down. As Leigh Ann Wheeler observes, “The liberalizing sexual trend emancipated even the women it horrified, because the same sexual freedom that encouraged sexual expression released women to speak openly against sexual amusements.” Wheeler, , Against Obscenity: Reform and the Politics of Womanhood in America, 1873–1935 (Baltimore, 2007), 182–83Google Scholar.

5 Trask, Michael, Cruising Modernism: Class and Sexuality in American Literature and Social Thought (Ithaca, NY, 2003), 168Google Scholar; Cocks, Catherine, “Rethinking Sexuality in the Progressive Era,” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 5 (Apr. 2006): 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Corrales, Barbara Smith, “Prurience, Prostitution and Progressive Improvement: The Crowley Connection, 1909–1918,” Louisiana History 45 (Winter 2004): 37Google Scholar. Also Alexander, Ruth M., “The Girl Problem”: Female Sexual Delinquency in New York, 1900–1930 (Ithaca, NY, 1995)Google Scholar.

6 On cross-class contacts as a central theme of American modernism, Stansell, Christine, American Moderns: Bohemian New York and the Creation of a New Century (2000; Princeton, 2010)Google Scholar.

7 Peiss, Kathy, Cheap Amusements: Working Women and Leisure in Turn-of-the-Century New York (Philadelphia, 1986), 117Google Scholar. Other works that use the high culture/low culture dichotomy when discussing sexuality: Tomko, Linda, Dancing Class: Gender, Ethnicity and Social Divides in American Dance, 1890–1920 (Bloomington, IN, 1999)Google Scholar; McBee, Randy, Dance Hall Days: Intimacy and Leisure among Working-Class Immigrants in the United States (New York, 2000)Google Scholar; Ullman, Sex Seen; and Johnson, Katie N., Sisters in Sin: Brothel Drama in America, 1900–1920 (New York, 2006)Google Scholar.

8 Kibler, Allison, Rank Ladies: Gender and Cultural Hierarchy in American Vaudeville (Chapel Hill, 1999)Google Scholar; Gay, Peter, The Bourgeois Experience, Victoria to Freud, vol. 1, Education of the Senses (1984; New York, 1999)Google Scholar; Scobey, David, “Nymphs and Satyrs: Sex and the Bourgeois Public Sphere in Victorian New York,” Winterthur Portfolio 37 (Spring 2002): 43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Horowitz, Joseph, Wagner Nights: An American History (Berkeley, 1994)Google Scholar, emphasizes opera's potential for emotional intensity and sexual expression. Johnson, Sisters in Sin, 3; Cowley, Malcolm, Exile's Return: A Literary Odyssey of the 1920s (1934; New York, 1994), 8Google Scholar. Stansell, American Moderns, is the standard work on the pre-World War I modernists.

9 Literary scholars have noted this change as it manifested itself in American fiction, but it has not generally been studied by historians. An exception is Cook, James, The Arts of Deception: Playing with Fraud in the Age of Barnum (Cambridge, MA, 2001)Google Scholar.

10 For a biography of Held, see Golden, Eve, Anna Held and the Birth of Ziegfeld's Broadway (Lexington, MA, 2000)Google Scholar. Also, Mizejewski, Linda, Ziegfeld Girl: Image and Icon in Culture and Cinema (Durham, NC, 1999), 41–64Google Scholar; Banner, Lois W., American Beauty (Chicago, 1983), 187Google Scholar.

11 For the juxtaposition of female sexual independence and male authority, Latham, Angela J., Posing a Threat: Flappers, Chorus Girls and Other Brazen Performers of the American 1920s (Hanover, NH, 2000), 138Google Scholar; and Glenn, Female Spectacle. On female sexuality as performance: Pullen, Kirsten, Actresses and Whores: On Stage and in Society (New York, 2005)Google Scholar; Mizejewski, Ziegfeld Girl; and Sentilles, Renée, Performing Menken: Adah Isaacs Menken and the Birth of American Celebrity (New York, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Clippings, Sunday Record-Herald (Chicago), June 13, 1900 (quotation), and Denver Post, Oct. 27, 1913, Anna Held Scrapbook in the Billy Rose Theater Collection, New York Public Library [NYPL]; The Bulletin (San Francisco), Dec. 23, 1911Google Scholar; Evening World (New York), Dec. 9, 1903Google Scholar; San Francisco Call, Nov. 24 1911; unidentified clipping, May 29, 1903, Robinson Locke.

13 Atlanta Constitution, Mar. 6, 1898; Colombier, Marie, Voyages de Sarah Bernhardt en Amérique (Paris, 1887), 90Google Scholar; unidentified clippings, Feb. 9, 1899 and Dec. 15, 1899, and clipping, Mail and Empire (Toronto), Dec. 9, 1899Google Scholar, Robinson Locke; Boston critic in New York Evening Journal, Feb. 7, 1899.

14 Boston Daily Globe, Nov. 8, 1896. This chronology varies from the one recounted in Golden, Anna Held, 21–25. For Held's remembrance, see New York Evening News, Jan. 4, 1917.

15 Boston Daily Globe, Oct. 11 and Nov. 10, 1896. The Oxford English Dictionary notes that “pussy” was used to describe female genitalia in the seventeenth century. In France, the word chatte was a vulgar synonym for vagina. In 1893, the Barrison Sisters began singing “Do You Want To See My Pussy?” in small-time theaters in New York. During the song the sisters slowly raised their skirts until they displayed furry black cat faces sown into the crotch areas of their petticoats. The sisters next toured Europe, appeared at the Folies Bergères in Paris, and were banned from performing in Berlin. Held and her audience certainly understood the reference in the song. On the Barrison sisters: Chicago Daily Tribune, Oct. 2 and 5, 1896; New York Times, Apr. 3, 1898.

16 Boston Daily Globe, Nov. 8, 1896.

17 Unidentified clipping, Apr. 20, 1899, Robinson Locke.

18 Cleveland News, Oct. 19 and 23, 1906.

19 New York Evening Journal, Oct. 15, 1901Google Scholar; clippings, New York Mail, Sept. 12, 1911; and Anna Held, “My Beginnings,” Theatre, July 1907, in Robinson Locke.

20 San Francisco Call, Mar. 25, 1897; Washington Post, Feb. 28, 1897; unidentified clipping, Aug. 1896, Robinson Locke; Atlanta Constitution, Mar. 21, 1892.

21 New York Evening Journal, Nov. 20, 1899; San Francisco Call, Dec. 16, 1905; Washington Times, Dec. 24, 1905.

22 San Francisco Call, May 28, 1900.

23 Douglas, Ann, Terrible Honesty: Mongrel Manhattan in the 1920s (New York, 1995)Google Scholar; Baker, Houston A. Jr., “Modernism and the Harlem Renaissance,” American Quarterly 39 (Spring 1987): 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crunden, Robert, Body and Soul: The Making of American Modernism (New York, 2000), 278Google Scholar; Erenberg, Lewis A., Steppin' Out: New York Nightlife and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880–1930 (Chicago, 1981), 218Google Scholar; Glenn, Susan A., Female Spectacle: The Theatrical Roots of Modern Feminism (Cambridge, MA, 2000), 194Google Scholar.

24 My interpretation differs from well-known works on the cultural history of perception: Batchen, Geoffrey, Burning with Desire: The Conception of Photography (Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar; and Crary, Jonathan, Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: MA, 1990)Google Scholar.

25 Jütte, Robert, A History of the Senses: From Antiquity to Cyberspace (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar; Classen, Constance, Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and Across Cultures (London, 1993)Google Scholar; and Howes, David, ed., Empire of the Senses. The Sensual Culture Reader (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar.

26 Mill, John Stuart, A System of Logic (1843; New York, 1893), 425–26Google Scholar.

27 Martin, Terence, The Instructed Vision: Scottish Common Sense Philosophy and the Origins of American Fiction (Bloomington, IN, 1981)Google Scholar; Looby, Christopher, “The Constitution of Nature: Taxonomy as Politics in Jefferson, Peale, and Bartram,” Early American Literature 22 (Dec. 1987): 252–74Google Scholar; Ahlstrom, Sydney E., “The Scottish Philosophy and American Theology,” Church History 24 (Sept. 1955): 257–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Whitman, Walt, Leaves of Grass (repr. New York, 1902)Google Scholar, 38, 88; Emerson, Ralph Waldo, Essay On Compensation (repr. Sewanee, 1906), 8Google Scholar.

28 Schroeder, Theodore, “Obscene” Literature and Constitutional Law: A Forensic Defence of Freedom of the Press (1911; Whitefish, MT, 2007), 13Google Scholar; New York Tribune, July 27, 1881; New York Times, Mar. 14, 1855; thirty years later, the police repeated this pattern of arrest: The Sun (New York), June 23, 1885Google Scholar.

29 New York Times, Apr. 2, 1875, Aug. 4, 1873, June 3, 1876, June 15, 1885, and May 25, 1892; San Francisco Call, Apr. 23, 1899. On the emergence of red light districts, Shumsky, Neil Larry, “Tacit Acceptance: Respectable Americans and Segregated Prostitution, 1870–1910,” Journal of Social History 19 (Summer 1986): 665–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Garland, Hamlin, Crumbling Idols: Twelve Essays on Art Dealing Chiefly with Literature, Painting and Drama (Chicago, 1894), 123Google Scholar; New York Sun, June 3, 1907. On the connection between impressionism and photography: Wilenski, R.H., Modern French Painting, (New York, 1949), 9Google Scholar; and Gauss, Charles E., The Aesthetic Theories of French Artists, 1855 to the Present (Baltimore, 1949), 21Google Scholar; Heilbrum, Francoise, “Impressionism and Photography,” History of Photography 33 (Feb. 2009): 18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Varnedoe, Kirk, “The Artifice of Candor: Impressionism and Photography Reconsidered,” Art in America 68 (Jan. 1980): 66–78Google Scholar.

31 Boyle, Richard J., American Impressionism (Boston, 1974)Google Scholar; New York Tribune, July 22, 1900; Howells, William Dean, Criticism and Fiction (New York, 1892), 104Google Scholar; on realism: Shi, David, Facing Facts: Realism in American Thought and Culture, 1850–1920 (New York, 1995)Google Scholar. For realism and impressionism, Nochlin, Linda, Realism (Harmondsworth, UK, 1971)Google Scholar.

32 Weinberg, H. Barbara, American Impressionism and Realism: The Painting of Modern Life, 1885–1915 (New York, 1994)Google Scholar.

33 Henry James was the American writer who most vigorously explored the idea that reality was a construction. His doubt made him a true precursor of modernism. See Posnock, Ross, The Trial of Curiosity: Henry James, William James, and the Challenge of Modernity (New York, 1991)Google Scholar.

34 Howells's literary successors, countered James's perceptual relativism by asserting, after the French writer Émile Zola, that a tangible real could still be found. These naturalists argued that there were irrefutable laws of heredity, science, and nature molding human actions. Social behaviors were impermanent and false, but truth could still be found because the artist could perceive the underlying forces shaping human action. Shi, Facing Facts, 220–22.

35 James, William, Principles of Psychology (1890; New York, 1950)Google Scholar, 1:221, 464–65, 2:289; for a general discussion, Wade, Nicholas, A Natural History of Vision (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar.

36 Wade, Nicholas, Perception and Illusion: Historical Perspectives (New York, 2005), 198Google Scholar.

37 Paducah Evening Sun, June 14, 1904; The Sun (New York), July 26, 1901Google Scholar; Washington Herald, Nov. 10, 1909; San Francisco Call, Jan. 19, 1904; New York Daily Tribune, Mar. 31, 1905.

38 Benjamin, Walter, “First Sketches” in Benjamin, The Arcades Project, eds. Eiland, H. and McLaughlin, K. (Cambridge, MA, 1999)Google Scholar, 827, 841. Richardson, Robert D., William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism (Boston, 2006), 366Google Scholar.

39 On magicians, Cook, The Arts of Deception.

40 Chicago Daily Tribune, Aug. 11, 1877; “Don't Call Me a Flirt” c. 1870, unbound scrapbook, box 33, Minstrel Show Collection, Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas; Chicago Daily Tribune, July 28, 1901, Oct. 4, 1903, Nov. 3, 1907.

41 New York Tribune, Oct. 31, 1905, Mar. 29, 1906; Evening World (New York), Mar. 28, 1906Google Scholar; Schroeder, “Obscene” Literature and Constitutional Law, 14.

42 Sunday Record-Herald [Chicago], June 13, 1909, clipping in Anna Held Scrapbook, NYPL; Los Angeles Evening Herald, Jan. 1, 1912; Salt Lake Herald, Mar. 24, 1907; Washington Herald, Dec. 1, 1907.

43 Evening World (New York), Mar. 9, 1900Google Scholar; Kern, Stephen, Eyes of Love: The Gaze in English and French Paintings and Novels, 1840–1900 (Chicago, 1996), 14Google Scholar; on Held's sexualized gaze, see also Mizejewski, Ziegfeld Girl, 53–54; unidentified clipping, Dec. 22, 1901, Robinson Locke; lyrics from Anna Held, Alfred Bryan, and Harry Tierney, “Oh I want to be good but my eyes won't let me,” published by Jerome H. Remick & Co, 1916.

44 Clipping, Chicago Record Herald, June 13, 1909, Robinson Locke.

45 Washington Post, Feb. 11, 1898.

46 Benjamin, Arcades Project, 493.

47 Evening World (New York), Dec. 2, 1901Google Scholar.

48 On the milk bath, Golden, Anna Held, 31–33; clipping, Broadway Magazine, Nov., 1907, Robinson Locke.

49 Humbug was a profoundly empiricist concept. It was used in the mid-nineteenth century to describe Barnum-like frauds. It rested on the idea that the illusion was fake and that a true meaning could be detected by the acute observer. See Harris, Neil, Humbug: The Art of P.T. Barnum (Chicago, 1981), 79Google Scholar; and Cook The Arts of Deception, 120.

50 Unidentified clippings, Apr. 20, 1899, Mar. 26, 1900, Robinson Locke; San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 24, 1911.

51 Clipping, New York Journal, Oct. 31, 1897, Robinson Locke.

52 Los Angeles Examiner, Jan. 3, 1912; clipping, Broadway Magazine, Nov. 1907, Robinson Locke.

53 The Bulletin (San Francisco), Nov. 5, 1913Google Scholar.

54 Unidentified Clipping, Robinson Locke; Commercial Tribune (Cincinnati), Feb. 10, 1914, and Broadway Magazine, Nov. 1907.

55 Unidentified clipping, Baltimore, Feb. 23, 1916, Held Scrapbook; Evening Herald [Los Angeles], Nov. 10, 1913. Fashion is an area of performance where people gain agency by manipulating gendered objectifications of their own body. As a star, Held embraced in this double-sided empowerment consciously. On fashion as performance, Dudden, Faye, Women in the American Theatre: Actresses and Audiences, 1790–1870 (New Haven, 1994)Google Scholar; and Latham, Angela, Posing a Threat: Flappers, Chorus Girls, and Other Brazen Performers of the American 1920s (Hanover, NH, 2000)Google Scholar.

56 Unidentified clipping, Robinson Locke.

57 On corsets, Kunzle, David, Fashion and Fetishism: Corsets, Tight-Lacing and Other Forms of Body Sculpture (1982; Stroud, UK, 2004)Google Scholar; and Finch, Casey, “Hooked and Buttoned Together: Victorian Underwear and Representations of the Female Body,” Victorian Studies 34 (Spring 1991): 337–63Google Scholar; on the demise of the swan corset, Steele, Valerie, The Corset: A Cultural History (New Haven, 2001), 84–85Google Scholar; clipping, Nashville Banner, Oct. 2, 1913, Held Scrapbook; Anna Held to Liane Carrera, July 14, 1915, file 6: Liane Carrera, box 2, Anna Held Museum Papers, NYPL.

58 San Francisco Call, July 25, 1904; clipping, Syracuse Post Standard, n.d., 1909; Annette Kellerman, envelope 903, Robinson Locke; Manager's Report, Philadelphia, Jan. 3, 1911, reports, vol. 11, Keith Albee Collection, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

59 Atlanta Constitution, Oct. 31, 1911; Clipping, Daily News (Denver), Dec. 5, 1911, Held Scrapbook; Evening Herald (Los Angeles), Jan. 1, 1912.

60 San Francisco Call, Nov. 24, 1911; clippings, Denver Post, Oct. 29, 1913, Daily News (Denver), Nov. 29, 1911, Held ScrapbookGoogle Scholar.

61 San Francisco Call, Dec. 25, 1911.

62 Clipping, Los Angeles Daily Times, Nov. 8, 1913, Held Scrapbook.

63 Clippings, Morning Telegraph (New York), May 20, 1909; St Paul Pioneer Press, Apr. 24, 1916, Held Scrapbook.

64 It is unclear what killed Anna Held. Her doctor, her daughter, and most subsequent chroniclers assert that she died of multiple myeloma. At the time, some doctors she consulted insisted she was suffering from pernicious anemia. New York Times, Aug. 13, 1918.

65 Sandburg, Carl, “An Electric Sign Goes Dark” in Sandburg, Smoke and Steel (New York, 1920), 213Google Scholar.