Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:19:56.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varieties and finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

L. G. Kovács
Affiliation:
Australian National UniversityCanberra
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The theory of discrete, abstract groups, as presented in current texts, consists of investigations of various special classes of groups: it has very few completely general results. For some classes (say, for finite groups) the investigations have been extensive and successful; in a few cases (say, for finitely generated abelian groups) they have even reached a sense of completeness. The choice of some of these classes was dictated by the needs of other branches of mathematics. Many more were introduced with the view of extending the scope of certain powerful but special results, and a large part of the literature is taken up by elaborate counterexamples which mark the limits of these generalizations. In so far as one is looking for some kind of classification theory, it is immediately evident that the classes investigated were chosen by historical accident rather than by any master plan, and so far do not appear to form the initial part of a pattern which could be enlarged and completed in the future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1969

References

[1]Cossey, P. J., ‘On varieties of A-groups’, Ph. D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, 1966.Google Scholar
[2]Hall, Marshall Jr, ‘Subgroups of finite index in free groups’, Canad. J. Math. 1 (1949), 187190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hall, P. and Higman, Graham, ‘On the ρ-length of ρ-soluble groups and reduction theorems for Burnside's problem’, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 6 (1956), 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Heineken, Hermann and Neumann, Peter M., ‘Identical relations and decision procedures for groups’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 7 (1967), 3947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Higman, Graham, ‘Representations of general linear groups and varieties of ρ-groups’, Proc. Internet. Conf. Theory of Groups, Austral. Nat. Uni. Canberra, August 1965, pp. 167173. Gordon and Breach, New York etc. (1967).Google Scholar
[6]Kargapolov, M. I., ‘Locally finite groups possessing normal systems with finite factorsSibirsk. Mat. Ž. 2 (1961), 853873.Google Scholar
[7]Kovács, L. G., ‘Varieties and the Hall-Higman paper’, Proc. Internet. Conf. Theory of Groups, Austral. Nat. Univ. Canberra, August 1965, pp. 217219. Gordon and Breach, New York etc. (1967).Google Scholar
[8]Kovács, L. G., ‘On the number of varieties of groups’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 8 (1968), 444446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kovács, L. G. and Newman, M. F., ‘Cross varieties of groups’, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A. 292 (1966), 530536.Google Scholar
[10]Kovács, L. G. and Newman, M. F., ‘Minimal verbal subgroups’, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 62 (1966), 347350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kurosh, A. G., The Theory of Groups, Vol. II, chelsea, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
[12]Neumann, B. H., ‘Identical relations in groups, I’, Math. Ann. 114 (1937), 506525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Neumann, B. H., ‘Varieties of groups’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 603613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Neuman, Hanna, ‘Varieties of groups’, Proc. Internal. Conf. Theory of Groups, Austral. Nat. Univ. Canberra, August 1965, pp. 251259. Gordon and Breach, New York, etc. (1967).Google Scholar
[15]Neumann, Hanna, Varieties of Groups, Springer, Berlin etc., 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Walter, J. H., ‘Finite groups with abelian Sylow 2-subgroups of order 8’, Invent. Math. 2 (1967), 332376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Walter, J. H., ‘The characterization of finite groups with abelian Sylow 2-subgroups’, (to appear).Google Scholar