Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:09:33.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation of Fixed-Point and Coincidence Sets

Part of: Maps and general types of spaces defined by maps Connections with other structures, applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

David Gauld
David Gauld
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of AucklandAuckland, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Topologise the set of continuous self-mappings of a Hausdorff space by the graph topology. When the set of closed subsets of the space is given the upper semi-finite topology then the function which assigns to a map its fixed-point set is continuous. In many familiar cases this is the largest such topology. Related results also hold for the function which assigns to each pair of maps their coincidence set.

Keywords

fixed-point setcoincidence setgraph topologyupper semi-finite topologyproperty W.

MSC classification

Secondary: 54H25: Fixed-point and coincidence theorems 54C35: Function spaces 54C60: Set-valued maps
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 214 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1988

References

[1]Browder, F. E., ‘On continuity of fixed points under deformations of continuous mappings’, Summa Brasil. Mat. 4 (1960), 183–191.Google Scholar
[2]Brown, R. F. and Fadell, E., ‘Nonsingular path fields on compact topological manifolds’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1965), 1342–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Connett, J. E., ‘On the cohomology of fixed-point sets and coincidence-point sets’, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 24 (1975), 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gauld, D. B., ‘The graph topology for function spaces’, Indian J. Math. 18 (1976), 125–132.Google Scholar
[5]Kakutani, S., ‘A generalization of Brouwer's fixed point theorem’, Duke Math. J. 8 (1941), 457–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Martin, J. R., Oversteegen, L. G. and Tumchatyn, E. D., ‘Fixed point sets of products and cones’, Pacific J. Math. 101 (1982), 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Michael, E., ‘Topologies on spaces of subsets’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1951), 152–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Ponomarev, V. I., ‘A new space of closed sets and multivalued continuous mappings of bicompacta’, Mat. Sbornik 48 (90) (1959), 191–212,Google Scholar
Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 38 (1964), 95–118.Google Scholar
[9]Robbins, H., ‘Some complements to Brouwer's fixed point theorem’, Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 225–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar